Abstract
Biodiesel can be produced from different vegetable oils and the choice of the blend (mix of oils) to be used for biodiesel production has an important impact on its cost and environmental performance. This chapter presents a model that determines the optimal blend that minimizes production costs and GHG emissions and assesses the influence of technical constraints on the decision objectives. For this purpose, an algorithm for the allocation of shadow prices to the constituent parts of the composite objective function was implemented. The technical constraints in the model control biodiesel properties based on the feedstock’s chemical composition, taking into account inherent compositional uncertainty. The information obtained from the shadow prices allowed the identification of which technical constraint limits GHG reduction and cost effectiveness. Thus, the model can be used for evaluating the effects of technical progress or policy mandatory measures relatively to the cost and GHG emissions of the biodiesel production process.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Akgul, O., Shah, N., & Papageorgiou, L. G. (2012). An optimisation framework for a hybrid first/second generation bioethanol supply chain. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 42, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2012.01.012
ASTM. (2008). Standard specification for biodiesel fuel blend stock (B100) for middle distillate fuels. Report no. D6751–08.
Bairamzadeh, S., Pishvaee, M. S., & Saidi-Mehrabad, M. (2016). Multiobjective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable bioethanol supply chain design under multiple uncertainties. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 55, 237–256. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.5b02875
Bamgboye, A. I., & Hansen, A. C. (2008). Prediction of cetane number of biodiesel fuel from the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) composition. International Agrophysics, 22, 21–29.
Buratti, C., Barbanera, M., & Fantozzi, F. (2012). A comparison of the European renewable energy directive default emission values with actual values from operating biodiesel facilities for sunflower, rape and soya oil seeds in Italy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 47, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.008
Caldeira, C., Gülsen, E., Olivetti, E. A., et al. (2014). A multiobjective model for biodiesel blends minimizing cost and greenhouse gas emissions. In B. Murgante, et al. (Eds), Computational science and its applications – ICCSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 8581, 653–666. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09150-1_48
Caldeira, C., Freire, F., Olivetti, E. A., & Kirchain, R. (2017). Fatty acid based prediction models for biodiesel properties incorporating compositional uncertainty. Fuel, 196, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.01.074
CEN. (2008). EN 14214: Automotive fuels – fatty acid methyl esters (FAME) for diesel engines – requirements and test methods.
Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. (1959). Chance-constrained programming. Management Science, 6, 73–79.
Cohon, J. L. (1978). Multiobjective programming and planning (1st ed.). New York: Academic Press.
European Comission. (2009). Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and the council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources, pp. 16–62.
Gal, T. (1986). Shadow prices and sensitivity analysis in linear programming under degeneracy. State-of-the-Art-Survey, Operational Research Spectrum, 8, 59–71.
GAMS. (2011). GAMS Development Corporation: General Algebraic Modeling System (GAMS) Release 23.7.3. Washington, DC, USA.
Giakoumis, E. G. (2013). A statistical investigation of biodiesel physical and chemical properties, and their correlation with the degree of unsaturation. Renewable Energy, 50, 858–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2012.07.040
Gülşen, E., Olivetti, E., Freire, F., et al. (2014). Impact of feedstock diversification on the cost-effectiveness of biodiesel. Applied Energy, 126, 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.03.063
Ho, J. (2000). Computing true shadow prices in linear programming. Informatica, 11(4), 421–434.
Hoekman, S. K., Broch, A., Robbins, C., et al. (2012). Review of biodiesel composition, properties and specifications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 143–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.143
Hwang, C.-L., & Masud, A. S. M. (1979). Multiple objective decision making — Methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey. Systems, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Volume 164.
IndexMundi. (2014). Retrieved May 19, 2014, from http://www.indexmundi.com/. http://www.indexmundi.com/
Kampempe, J. D. B. (2012). Chance-constrained approaches for multiobjective stochastic linear programming problems. American Journal of Operations Research, 2, 519–526. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajor.2012.24061
Koltai, T., & Terlaky, T. (2000). The difference between the managerial and mathematical interpretation of sensitivity analysis results in linear programming. International Journal of Production Economics, 65, 257–274.
Kumral, M. (2003). Application of chance-constrained programming based on multi-objective simulated annealing to solve a mineral blending problem. Engineering Optimization, 35, 661–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/03052150310001614837
Malça, J., Coelho, A., & Freire, F. (2014). Environmental life-cycle assessment of rapeseed-based biodiesel: Alternative cultivation systems and locations. Applied Energy, 114, 837–844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.048
Mavrotas, G. (2009). Effective implementation of the ε-constraint method in Multi-Objective Mathematical Programming problems. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 213, 455–465.
McCarl, B., Rister, M. E., Stokes, J., & Ziari, H. (1996). Improving shadow price information: Obtaining relevant shadow prices from problems with decomposable objectives. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78, 599–705.
Moghaddam, A. T. N., & Michelot, C. (2009). A contribution to the linear programming approach to joint cost allocation: Methodology and application. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 999–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.12.043
Nejad, M. A. T. (2007). Allocation of CO2 emissions in petroleum refineries to petroleum joint products: A linear programming model for practical application. Energy Economics, 29, 974–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2006.11.005
Olivetti, E., Gaustad, G. G., Fiels, F. R., & Kirchain, R. E. (2011). Increasing secondary and renewable material use: A chance constrained modeling approach to manage feedstock quality variation. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 4118–4126.
Olivetti, E., Gülşen, E., Malça, J., et al. (2014). Impact of policy on greenhouse gas emissions and economics of biodiesel production. Environmental Science & Technology, 48, 7642–7650. https://doi.org/10.1021/es405410u
Palak, G., Ekşioğlu, S. D., & Geunes, J. (2014). Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 198–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.04.019
Park, J.-Y., Kim, D.-K., Lee, J.-P., et al. (2008). Blending effects of biodiesels on oxidation stability and low temperature flow properties. Bioresource Technology, 99, 1196–1203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.02.017
Ramos, M. J., Fernández, C. M., Casas, A., et al. (2009). Influence of fatty acid composition of raw materials on biodiesel properties. Bioresource Technology, 100, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.06.039
Refaat, A. A. (2009). Correlation between the chemical structure of biodiesel and its physical properties. International journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 6, 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326109
Rong, A., Lahdelma, R., Rong, A., & Lahdelma, R. (2008). Fuzzy chance constrained linear programming model for optimizing the scrap charge in steel production. European Journal of Operational Research, 186, 953–964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.017
Sahinidis, N. V. (2004). Optimization under uncertainty: State-of-the-art and opportunities. Computers and Chemical Engineering, 28, 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.017
Sakallı, Ü. S., & Baykoç, Ö. F. (2013). Strong guidance on mitigating the effects of uncertainties in the brass casting blending problem: A hybrid optimization approach. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 64, 562–576. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2012.50
Sakallı, Ü. S., Baykoç, Ö. F., & Birgören, B. (2011). Stochastic optimization for blending problem in brass casting industry. Annals of Operations Research, 186, 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-0851-1
Segarra, E., Kramer, R. A., & Taylor, D. B. (1985). Stochastic programming analysis of the farm level implications of soil erosion control. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 17, 147–154.
Shaik, S., Helmers, G. A., & Langemeier, M. R. (2002). Direct and indirect shadow price and cost estimates of nitrogen pollution abatement direct and indirect shadow price pollution abatement.
Soimakallio, S., & Koponen, K. (2011). How to ensure greenhouse gas emission reductions by increasing the use of biofuels? – Suitability of the European Union sustainability criteria. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 3504–3513.
Thomas, A. R. C., Bond, A. J., & Hiscock, K. M. (2013). A multi-criteria based review of models that predict environmental impacts of land use-change for perennial energy crops on water, carbon and nitrogen cycling. GCB Bioenergy, 5, 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01198.x
Tomaschek, J., Özdemir, E. D., Fahl, U., & Eltrop, L. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions and abatement costs of biofuel production in South Africa. GCB Bioenergy, 4, 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01154.x
You, F., Graziano, D. J., & Snyder, S. W. (2012). Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains: Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input – output analysis. AIChE Journal, 58, 1157–1180. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic
Acknowledgements
Carla Caldeira acknowledges financial support from the Portuguese Science and Technology Foundation (FCT) through grant SFRH/BD/51952/2012. This work has also been supported by FCT project FEDER/FCT|PTDC/AAG-MAA/6234/2014 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016765). The research presented in this article has been developed under the framework of Energy for Sustainability Initiative of the University of Coimbra and the MIT Portugal Program. Stelios Rozakis acknowledges financial support from BioEcon project (ID: 669062) financed from the EU H2020-WIDESPREAD-2014-2 program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Caldeira, C., Dias, L., Freire, F., Kremmydas, D., Rozakis, S. (2018). Allocating Shadow Prices in a Multi-objective Chance Constrained Problem of Biodiesel Blending. In: Berbel, J., Bournaris, T., Manos, B., Matsatsinis, N., Viaggi, D. (eds) Multicriteria Analysis in Agriculture. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76929-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76929-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-76928-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-76929-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)