Skip to main content

In a Quest for Suitable Similarity Measures to Compare Experience-Based Evaluations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Intelligence (IJCCI 2015)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 669))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

After representing experience-based evaluations as intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs), one might expect that all of the existing similarity measures for IFSs could be used to compare them. However, only some of those measures seem to be suitable to do so according to a psychological perspective which indicates that similarity measures assuming symmetry and transitivity could not reflect properly the perceived similarity. Consequently, to determine empirically their suitability for such comparisons, several similarity measures for IFSs were tested on simulated experience-based evaluations. This paper presents our findings about how each of them reflected the perceived similarity among the simulated experience-based evaluation sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20(1), 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov, K.T.: On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets Theory: Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 283. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Buckley, C., Salton, G., Allan, J.: The effect of adding relevance information in a relevance feedback environment. In: Croft, B.W., van Rijsbergen, C.J. (eds.) SIGIR 1994, pp. 292–300. Springer, London (1994). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=188490.188586

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burges, C.J.: A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 2(2), 121–167 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Joachims, T.: Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In: Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, chap. 11, pp. 169–184. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Joachims, T.: Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Nédellec, C., Rouveirol, C. (eds.) ECML 1998. LNCS, vol. 1398, pp. 137–142. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). doi:10.1007/BFb0026683

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, D.D., Yang, Y., Rose, T.G., Li, F.: RCV1: a new benchmark collection for text categorization research. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 5, 361–397 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loor, M., De Tré, G.: Connotation-differential prints - comparing what is connoted through (fuzzy) evaluations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Fuzzy Computation Theory and Applications, pp. 127–136 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Loor, M., De TrĂ©, G.: Vector based similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Atanassov, K.T., BaczyÅ„ski, M., Drewniak, J., Kacprzyk,J., Krawczak, M., Szmidt, E., Wygralak, M., Zadrożny, S. (eds.) Modern Approaches in Fuzzy Sets, Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets, Generalized Nets and Related Topics: Volume I: Foundations, SRI-PAS, pp. 105–127 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loor, M., De Tré, G.: Choosing suitable similarity measures to compare intuitionistic fuzzy sets that represent experience-based evaluation sets. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Computational Intelligence (IJCCI 2015) - Volume 2: FCT, pp. 57—68 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rose, T., Stevenson, M., Whitehead, M.: The reuters corpus volume 1-from yesterday’s news to tomorrow’s language resources. In: LREC, vol. 2, pp. 827–832 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Szmidt, E.: Similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Distances and Similarities in Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol. 307, pp. 87–129. Springer, Cham (2014)

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 114(3), 505–518 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: A concept of similarity for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its use in group decision making. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1129–1134 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Geometric similarity measures for the intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: 8th conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology (EUSFLAT-13), pp. 840–847. Atlantis Press (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84(4), 327 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vapnik, V.N.: The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer, New York (1995)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Vapnik, V.N., Vapnik, V.: Statistical Learning Theory, 1st edn. Wiley, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelo Loor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Loor, M., De Tré, G. (2017). In a Quest for Suitable Similarity Measures to Compare Experience-Based Evaluations. In: Merelo, J.J., et al. Computational Intelligence. IJCCI 2015. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 669. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48506-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48506-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48504-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48506-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics