Skip to main content

Frameworks, Tools, and Leadership for Responding to Strategic Alliances Challenges

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Leading and Managing in the Social Sector

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

Inter-organizational and cross sector alliances are increasingly important for tackling community and societal problems that are beyond the scope and capacity of single organizations. Yet multiple and perplexing challenges can confound joint work. This chapter explores some of these challenges, and uses two case studies to illustrate how a strategic alliance continuum and a set of questions for defining partner relationships have helped affiliating organizations clarify their purposes and make agreements. A third case study illustrates approaches to and qualities of leadership that contribute to successful alliances. Finally, Complexity Leadership Theory is used to suggest how strategic alliance partners and consultants can conceptualize and create leadership systems that respond to complexity.

An earlier version of this article was originally published in the OD Practitioner, 2011, 43(2), 22–27.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The state in which this ICC operates is not given in order to protect client confidentiality.

  2. 2.

    For clarity, I have simplified the Principles, as well as the organizational structure that grew from them.

  3. 3.

    Names of all interviewees and their organization and alliance affiliation have been changed, as interviews were confidential.

  4. 4.

    Direct quotes from interviews are in quotations.

References

  • Austin, J., & Drucker, P. (2002). Meeting the collaboration challenge workbook, developing strategic alliances between nonprofit organizations and businesses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, D., & Koney, K. (2000). Strategic alliances among health and human services organizations: From affiliations to consolidations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barringer, B., & Harrison, J. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management, 26(3), 367–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, N. (2005). Transorganization development for network building. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 41(1), 30–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.” Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkind, L., & Pardasani, M. (2012). More than the sum of its parts: An innovative organizational collaboration model. Administration in Social Work, 36, 258–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. H., & Tolbert, P. S. (2005). Organizational environments and interorganizational relationships; Organizational theory (Chaps. 9, 10). In Organizations, structures, processes, and outcomes (9th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012, Winter). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without easy answers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2011, Winter). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapucu, N. (2006). Public-nonprofit partnerships for collective action in dynamic contexts of emergencies. Public Administration, 84(1), 205–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipman-Blumen, J. (1996). Connective leadership. Claremont, CA: Peter F. Drucker Graduate Management Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, L. J., Dorn, B. C., & Henderson, J. M. (2005). Meta-leadership and national emergency preparedness. Working papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Kennedy School of Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshak, R. J. (2006). Covert processes at work, managing the five hidden processes of organizational change. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattessich, P., Murray-Close, M., & Monsey, B. (2001). Collaboration: What makes it work, a review of research literature on factors influencing successful collaboration. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1997). Images of organization. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oruc, L., & Sarikaya, M. (2011). Normative stakeholder theory in relation to ethics of care. Social Responsibility Journal, 7(3), 381–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prybil, L., Scutchfield, F. D., Killian, R., Kelly, A., Mays., G., Carman, A. … Fardo, D. W. (2014). Improving community health through hospital—Public health collaboration, insights and lessons learned from successful partnerships (pp. 1–112). Lexington, KY: Commonwealth Center for Governance Studies, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, M. (2011). A framework and tools to strengthen strategic alliances. OD Practitioner, 43(2), 23–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, R. (2005). The skilled facilitator approach. In S. Schuman (Ed.), The IAF handbook of group facilitation (pp. 21–34). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Straus, D. (2002). How to make collaboration work, Powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Marion, R. (2009). Complexity leadership in bureaucratic forms of organizing: A meso model. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 631–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merryn Rutledge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rutledge, M. (2017). Frameworks, Tools, and Leadership for Responding to Strategic Alliances Challenges. In: Tirmizi, S., Vogelsang, J. (eds) Leading and Managing in the Social Sector. Management for Professionals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47045-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics