Skip to main content

Interdisciplinary Team Approach to Clinical Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Person Centered Psychiatry

Abstract

The interdisciplinary team approach in health care settings is widely recognized as an important factor in providing quality patient care. This approach is supported by a growing research evidence that demonstrates that team functioning is associated with better patient outcomes, cost savings, reduced hospitalization, improved service provision, and enhanced patient and staff satisfaction. The team approach also helps health professionals with diverse skills to view clients and their families as whole persons, and is consistent with person-centered medicine. Research evidence suggests that these benefits occur because well-functioning teams make good decisions, cope effectively with complex tasks, and are able to coordinate their interventions and expertise. However, despite the growing awareness of potential benefits, many heath care organizations lack effective teamwork, with negative consequences on patient outcomes. The barriers to team approach have been attributed to several factors including professional hierarchy, frequent changes in caregivers, and patient transfers that make coordination and teamwork complicated. Perhaps, an important barrier to team approach is the silo approach and lack of interprofessional education of health professionals. This chapter highlights key issues and concepts of team approach and argues for interprofessional education as a basis for collaborative practice and improved patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ammon M. Dynamische Psychiatrie—ein integratives theoretisches und praktisches multidisziplinäres Behandlungskonzept. Dynamische Psychiatrie/Dynamic Psychiatry. 2014;262(263):89–107.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ammon G. Entwurf eines Dynamisch- Psychiatrischen Ich-Struktur-Konzepts—Zur Integration von funktional-struktureller Ich-Psychologie und Narzißmus-Theorie. In: Ammon G, editor. Handbuch der Dynamischen Psychiatrie I. Munich: Reinhardt; 1979. p. 95–159.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ammon G. Metodenintegration aus der Sicht der Dynamischen Psychiatrie. 39–40 In: Ammon G, Editor Handbuch der Dynamischen Psychiatrie 2. Munich: Reinhardt; 1982. p. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ball C, Kirby M, Williams S. Effect of the critical care outreach team on patient survival to discharge from hospital and readmission to critical care: non-randomised population based study. Br Med J. 2003;327:1014–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellomo RD, Goldsmith S, Uchino J, Buckmaster G, Hart H, et al. Prospective controlled trial of effect of medical emergency team on postoperative morbidity and mortality rates. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(4):916–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Berthoz A. Une théorie spatiale de la difference entre la sympathie et les processus de l’empathie. In: Botbol M, Garret N, editors. A. Besse: L’empathie au Carrefour des sciences et de la clinique. Doin, Paris; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bhutta A, Cohen J, Crisp N, Evans T, Fineberg H, et al. Education of health professionals for the 21st century: a global independent Commission. The Lancet. 2010;375(9721):1137–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blackmore G. Diagnosing and improving functioning in interdisciplinary health care teams. The Health Care Manager. 2012;31(3):197–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boon HS, Mior SA, Barnsley J, Ashbury FD, Haig R. The difference between integration and collaboration in patient care: results from key informant interview working in multiprofessional health care team. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009;32(9):715–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bosch J, Faber MJ, Cruijsberg J, Voerman GE, Leatherman S, et al. Review artcile: effectiveness of patient care teams and the role of clinical expertise and coordination: a literature review. Med Care Res Rev. 2009;66:5S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Botbol M, Garret-Gloanec N, Besse A. Empathy et Clinique integrative. In: Botbol M, Garret-Gloanec N, Besse A, editors. L’Empathie au Carrefour des Sciences et de la Clinique. Paris: Doin; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bower P, Campbell S, Bojke C, Sibbald B. Team structure, team climate and the quality of care in primary care: an observational study. Quality and Safety in Health Care. 2003;12(4):273–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Cohen HJ, Feussner JR, Weinberger M, Carnes M, Hamdy RC, Hsieh F, Phibbs C, Lavori P. A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(12):905–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Department of Health, United Kingdom. A Health Service for all the talents: developing the NHS workforce. London: Department of Health; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drinka TJK, Clark PG. Health care teamwork: interdisciplinary practice and teaching. Connecticut: Auburn House; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Frenk J, et al. Health professionals for a new century: transforming education to strengthen health systems in an interdependent world. The Lancet. 2010;376:1923–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Galletta M, Portoghese I, Battistelli A, Leiter MP. The roles of unit leadership an nurse-physcian collaboration on nursing turnover intention. Adv Nurs. 2013;69(8):1771–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gittel J. High performance healthcare: using the power of relationships to achieve quality, efficiency and resilience. New York, N.Y: McGraw-Hill; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grumbach K, Bodenheimer T. Can health care teams improve primary care practice? Jama-Journal of the American Medical Association. 2004;291(10):1246–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hainemann GD. Teams in health care settings. In Heinemann GD, Zeisss AM, editor. Team performance in health care. New York: Kluwer; 2002 p. 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hedrick SC, Chaney EF, Felker B, Liu CF, Hasenberg N, et al. Effectiveness of collaborative care depression treatment in veterans’ affairs primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:9–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Institute of Medicine. The Future of Nursing Leadership. Advancing Health: Washington, D.C., National Academy Press; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Institute of Medicine. Health professions education: A bridge to quality. Washington: D.C., National Aacademy Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jansen L. Collaborative and Interdisciplinary Health Care Teams: Ready or Not? J Prof Nurs. 2008;24(4):218–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jansson A, Isacsson A, Lindholm LH. Organisation of healthcare teams and the population’s contact with primary care. Scandinavian Journal of Health Care. 1992;10:257–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaplan GA, Willims JA, Daly B, Abraham K. A randomised controlled trial of comprehensive geriatric assessment and multidisciplinary intervention after discharge of elderly from the emergency department – The Deed II Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004;52:1417–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Küchenhoff J. Der integrative Prozess in der psychotherapie: methodenvielfalt—synergismus—integration. Schweizer Archiv für Neurologie und Psychiatrie. 2009;160(1):12–9.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Landman N, Aannestad LK, Smoldt RK, Cortese DA. Teamwork in Health Care. Nurs Admin Q. 2014;36(3):198–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lee T. Turning doctors into leaders. Harvard Business Review, 2010. p.50–58.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Lemieux-Charles L, McGuire WL. What do we know about health care team effectiveness? a review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2006;63:263–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rowe J. Approaching interdisciplinary research. In Kessel F, Rosenfield P, Anderson N, editors. Explaining the boundaries of health and social science: case studies in interdisciplinary innovation. New York, N.Y.: Oxford University Press; 2003. p. 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sommers LS, Marton KI, Barbaccia JC, Randolph J. Physician, nurse and social worker collaboration in primary health care for chronically ill seniors. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160:1825–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Spreier S, Fontaine M, Malloy R. Leadership run amok. The destructive potential of overachievers. Harvard Business Review, 2006. p.73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Storch JL. Division of Labour in health care: Pragmatics and ethics. Humane Medicine. 1994;10(4):262–9.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Suchman A, Sluyter D, Williamson P. Leading change in healthcare: transforming organisations using complexity, positive psychology and relationship-centred care. London, England: Radcliffe Publishing; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  36. University of Washington. Interdisciplinary team issues. 1998. http://depts.washington.edu/bioethx/topics/team.html Accessed 15 Jan 2015.

  37. Wagner EH. The role of patient care teams in chronic disease management. British Medical Jouranl. 2000;320:569–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Weiss D, Tilin F, Morgan M. The interprofessional health care team: leadership and development. Burlington, MA.: Jones & Bartlett Learning; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wheelan SA, Burchill CN, Tilin F. The link between teamwork and patients’ outcomes in intensive care units. Am J Crit Care. 2003;12:527–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Wikipedia. 2014. Interdisziplinarität. n.d. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interdisciplinarity.

  41. Wikipedia. 2013. Multidisziplinarität. n.d. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multidisziplinarit%C3%83_%C2%A4t.

  42. World Health Organization: Health Professions Network Nursing and Midwifery Office within the Department of Human Resources for Health. Framework for Action on Interprofessional Education & Collaborative Practice. WHO HRH/HPN/10.3. Geneva: World Health Organization. 2010. http://www.who.int/hrh/en/.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tesfamicael Ghebrehiwet PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ghebrehiwet, T., Ammon, M., Burbiel, I., Botbol, M. (2016). Interdisciplinary Team Approach to Clinical Care. In: Mezzich, J., Botbol, M., Christodoulou, G., Cloninger, C., Salloum, I. (eds) Person Centered Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39724-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39724-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39722-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39724-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics