Skip to main content

Taphonomy and Quality of the Fossil Record

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Micropaleontology

Abstract

The reliability of microfossils in stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental interpretation depends on how accurately the microfossil assemblage corresponds to the live community. The organisms after death undergo a complex transition from biosphere to lithosphere. The decay of the organic matter, post-mortem transport of the shells and their dissolution and diagenesis prior to and after burial under sediments determine the fidelity of the fossil records. The early taphonomic processes may cause preferential loss of some microfossils and post-mortem transport may move shells out of their original habitat with far-reaching implications for reconstruction of the past environment. Chemical susceptibility to diagenesis and dissolution may cause marked changes in trace elements and the stable isotope composition of the shells and, thus, limit the use of compositional data in paleoenvironmental and paleoclimatic interpretations. The fossil assemblages are time-averaged due to transport, dissolution, bioturbation and reworking. Moreover, sedimentation may be continuous to intermittent, and the rate of sedimentation may vary widely in different depositional settings. Taphonomy and sedimentation, thus, contribute to the resolution of a stratigraphic section. The chemical reactions of decay, traction velocities of shells, resolution analysis and mathematical model of bioturbation are discussed to develop an understanding of the microfossil records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aigner T (1985) Biofabrics as dynamic indicators in nummulitic accumulations. J Sediment Petrol 55:131–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison PA (2001) Decay. In: Briggs DEG, Crowther PR (eds) Palaeobiology II. Blackwell, London, pp 270–272

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Be AWH (1977) An ecological, zoogeographic and taxonomic review of recent planktonic foraminifera. In: Ramsay ATS (ed) Oceanic micropaleontology, vol 1. Academic, London, pp 1–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger WH (1970) Planktonic foraminifera: selective solution and lysocline. Mar Geol 8:111–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger WH (1985) CO2 increase and climatic prediction: clues from deep-sea carbonates. Episodes 8(3):163–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger WH, Heath GR (1968) Vertical mixing in pelagic sediments. J Mar Res 26(2):134–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger WH, Piper DJW (1972) Planktonic foraminifera: differential settling, dissolution and redeposition. Limnol Oceanogr 17:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandt DS (1989) Taphonomic grades as a classification for fossiliferous assemblages and implications for paleoecology. Palaios 4:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canfield DE, Raiswell R (1991) Carbonate precipitation and dissolution – its relevance to fossil preservation. In: Allison PE, Briggs DEG (eds) Taphonomy – releasing the data locked in the fossil record. Plenum, New York, pp 411–453

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois LG, Prell WL (1988) Effects of carbonate dissolution on the radiocarbon age structure of sediment mixed layers. Deep-Sea Res 35:1875–1885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh A, Saha S, Saraswati PK, BanerjeeS BS (2009) Intertidal foraminifera in the macrotidal estuaries of the Gulf of Cambay: implications for interpreting sea-level change in palaeo-estuaries. Mar Pet Geol 26:1592–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorry SJ, Hasler C, Davaud E (2006) Hydrodynamic behaviour of Nummulites: implications for depositional model. Facies 52:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell SM (1998) Time averaging in the marine fossil record: overview of strategies and uncertainties. Geobios 30:977–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kontrovitz M (1975) A study of the differential transportation of ostracodes. J Paleontol 49:937–941

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontrovitz M, Snyder SW, Brown RJ (1978) A flume study of the movement of foraminifera tests. Palaeogeogr Palaeoclimatol Palaeoecol 23:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RE, Liddell WD (1991) Taphonomy of foraminifera in modern carbonate environments: implications for the formation of foraminiferal assemblages. In: Donovan SK (ed) The process of fossilization. Belhaven, London, pp 170–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RE, Harris MS, Liddell WD (1995) Taphonomy and time-averaging of foraminiferal assemblages in Holocene tidal flat sediments, Bahia la Choya, Sonora, Mexico (northern Gulf of California). Mar Micropaleontol 26:187–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RE, Wehmiller JF, Harris MS, Liddell WD (1996) Comparative taphonomy of foraminifera and bivalves in Holocene shallow water carbonate and siliciclastic regimes: taphonomic grades and temporal resolution. Paleobiology 22:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin RE, Hippensteel SP, Pizzuto JE, Nikitina D (2003) Taphonomy and artificial time-averaging of marsh foraminiferal assemblages (Bombay Hook National Wildlife Refuge, Smyrna, Delaware, USA): implications for rate and magnitudes of late Holocene sea-level change. In: Olson HC, MarkLeckie P (eds) Micropaleontological proxies for sea-level change and stratigraphic discontinuities, vol 75, SEPM Special Publication., pp 31–49

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray JW (2006) Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Plotnick RE (1986) A fractal model for the distribution of stratigraphic hiatuses. J Geol 94:885–890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindel DE (1980) Microstratigraphic sampling and the limits of paleontologic resolution. Paleobiology 6:408–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindel DE (1982) Resolution analysis: a new approach to the gap in the fossil record. Paleobiology 8:340–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder SW, Hale WR, Kontrovitz M (1990) Assessment of postmortem transport of modern benthic foraminifera of the Washington continental shelf. Micropaleontology 36:259–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yordanova EK, Hohenegger J (2007) Studies of settling, traction and entrainment of larger benthic foraminiferal tests: implications for accumulation in shallow marine sediments. Sedimentology 54:1273–1306

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Martin RE (1999) Taphonomy: a process approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saraswati, P.K., Srinivasan, M.S. (2016). Taphonomy and Quality of the Fossil Record. In: Micropaleontology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14574-7_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics