Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
SpringerLink
Log in

Frontier Efficiency Analysis in Higher Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Incentives and Performance

Abstract

Over the last 20–30 years, many European governments have implemented reforms to improve the efficiency and competitiveness of their national higher education and research systems. They have granted universities more autonomy while introducing new accountability tools and fostering competition through performance-based funding schemes. The growing emphasis on productivity and efficiency has led to the diffusion of a variety of performance indicators, including publication and citation counts, and university rankings. Another approach increasingly applied in the higher education sector is frontier efficiency analysis. Similarly to university rankings, efficiency analyses include several indicators for research and teaching in order to assess the performance of a university or a university department. However, as opposed to most rankings, they relate the outputs to the inputs used and do not necessarily favor larger or richer institutions. Moreover, estimation techniques such as Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) do not require any assumption about the form of the production function and allow for different factor combinations to achieve efficiency. The method thus accounts for the diversity among universities and does not necessarily penalize more teaching-oriented institutions as compared to research-oriented ones. In this contribution we present the frontier efficiency approach and its application to higher education, highlighting the main estimation techniques and methodological specifications. We provide an overview of studies that have applied DEA to the higher education sector and discuss their results, methodological contributions, and shortcomings. We conclude by identifying the advantages and limitations of frontier efficiency approaches as compared to other performance measures in higher education and delineating possible areas for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbott M, Doucouliagos C (2003) The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Econ Educ Rev 22(1):89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abramo G, D’Angelo CA, Pugini F (2008) The measurement of Italian universities’ research productivity by a non parametric bibliometric methodology. Scientometrics 76(2):225–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Dal Bianco A (2006) Data envelopment analysis to the Italian university system: theoretical issues and policy implications. Int J Bus Perform Meas 8(4):344–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Johnes G (2009) Beyond frontiers: comparing the efficiency of higher education decision making units across more than one country. Educ Econ 17(1):59–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Pérez-Esparrells C (2010) Comparing efficiency in a cross-country perspective: the case of Italian and Spanish state universities. Higher Educ 59:85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Pohl C (2012) Comparing German and Italian public universities: convergence or divergence in the higher education landscape? Manage Dec Econ 33:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Salerno C (2007) Assessing the cost efficiency of Italian universities. Educ Econ 15(4):455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agasisti T, Catalano G, Landoni P, Verganti R (2012) Evaluating the performance of academic departments: an analysis of research-related output efficiency. Res Eval 21:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner DC, Lovell CAK, Schmidt P (1977) Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. J Econ 6:21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archibald RB, Feldman DH (2011) Why does college cost so much? Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanassopoulos AD, Shale E (1997) Assessing the comparative efficiency of higher education institutions in the UK by the means of data envelopment analysis. Educ Econ 5(2):117–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avkiran NK (2001) Investigating technical and scale efficiencies of Australian universities through data envelopment analysis. Socio-Econ Plann Sci 35(1):57–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley J (1990) Comparing university departments. Omega Int J Manage Sci 18(2):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley J (1995) Determining teaching and research efficiencies. J Oper Res Soc 46:441–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C (2004) Econometric approaches to the analysis of productivity of R&D systems: production functions and production frontiers. In: Moed HF, Glänzel W, Schmoch U (eds) Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: the use of publication and patent statistics in studies on S&T systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 51–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonaccorsi A, Daraio C, Simar L (2006) Advanced indicators of productivity of universities: an application of robust nonparametric methods to Italian data. Scientometrics 66(2):389–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrington R, Coelli T, Prasada Rao DS (2005) The performance of Australian universities: conceptual issues and preliminary results. Econ Pap 24(2):145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output and productivity. Econometrica 50(6):1393–1414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper W, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelli TJ, Prasada Rao DS, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Daraio C, Simar L (2005) Introducing environmental variables in nonparametric frontier models: a probabilistic approach. J Prod Anal 24:93–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem R, Brehony KJ (2005) Management as ideology: the case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxf Rev Educ 31(2):217–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fandel G (2007) On the performance of universities in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany: government’s redistribution of funds judged using DEA efficiency measures. Eur J Oper Res 176:521–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc A (Gen) 120:253–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flegg AT, Allen DO, Field K, Thurlow TW (2004) Measuring the efficiency of British universities: a multi-period data envelopment analysis. Educ Econ 12(3):231–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazelkorn E (2011) Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes J (2004) Efficiency measurement. In: Johnes G, Johnes J (eds) The international handbook on the economics of education. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 613–742

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes J (2006) Data envelopment analysis and its application to the measurement of efficiency in higher education. Econ Educ Rev 25:273–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes J (2008) Efficiency and productivity change in the English higher education sector from 1996/97 to 2004/05. Manchester Sch 76(6):653–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnes G, Johnes J (1993) Measuring the research performance of UK economics departments: an application of data envelopment analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 45:332–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Joumady O, Ris C (2005) Performance in European higher education: a non-parametric production frontier approach. Educ Econ 12(2):189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempkes G, Pohl C (2010) The efficiency of German universities: some evidence from nonparametric and parametric methods. Appl Econ 42:2063–2079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden G, Savage S, Kemp S (1997) Measuring public sector efficiency: a study of economic departments in Australian universities. Educ Econ 5(2):153–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ollsen M, Peters MA (2005) Neoliberalism, higher education and the knowledge economy: from the free market to knowledge capitalism. J Educ Policy 20(3):313–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar L, Wilson PW (1998) Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: how to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Manage Sci 44(1):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins C, Green R (1988) An experiment in the use of data envelopment analysis for evaluating the efficiency of UK university departments of accounting. Financ Account Manag 4(2):147–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warning S (2004) Performance differences in German higher education: empirical analysis of strategic groups. Rev Ind Organ 24:393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolszczak-Derlacz J, Parteka A (2011) Efficiency of European public higher education institutions: a two-stage multicountry approach. Scientometrics 89:887–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worthington A, Lee BL (2008) Efficiency, technology and productivity change in Australian universities, 1998-2003. Econ Educ Rev 27(3):285–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Administration, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Stefano Nigsch & Andrea Schenker-Wicki

Authors
  1. Stefano Nigsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andrea Schenker-Wicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Nigsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Isabell M. Welpe

  2. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Jutta Wollersheim

  3. TUM School of Management, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany

    Stefanie Ringelhan

  4. Zeppelin University, Friedrichshafen, Germany, and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Margit Osterloh

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nigsch, S., Schenker-Wicki, A. (2015). Frontier Efficiency Analysis in Higher Education. In: Welpe, I., Wollersheim, J., Ringelhan, S., Osterloh, M. (eds) Incentives and Performance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09785-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation