Abstract
Risk to the environment traditionally consists of an uncontrolled leakage of a gas or oil, resulting in pollution of the environment. Exploration, including drilling, and production of NGH carries an extremely low risk worldwide. The very low environmental risk is particularly important in the environmentally fragile Arctic environment. We suggest that the very low environmental risk factor may be key to the development of NGH in the Arctic Ocean region. When NGH is converted for production, only relatively pure methane and water are produced. NGH is stable within its reservoir and will not convert to its constituent gas and water unless the formation pressure is lowered or the temperature is raised sufficiently to introduce instability conditions. Thus, with careful drilling, the danger of gas venting is very low. In addition, during production the maximum gas pressures in the reservoir can be controlled, in strong contrast to conventional gas deposits in which very high pressures may exist from the outset. In addition, NGH deposits are not associated with liquid petroleum (oil), especially in the Arctic where predominantly biogenic NGH can be anticipated. Thus, even if a gas leak occurs, virtually no environmental hazard to macrofauna such as birds and Arctic mammals exists.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACS (2013) Kiruna declaration on the occasion of the eighth ministerial meeting of the Arctic council, Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013, p 7
Arctic Council (2013) Senior Arctic officials report to Ministers. Arctic Council Secretariat, Kiruna, Sweden, 15 May 2013, p 144
Connerty A (2006) The international tribunal for the law of the sea and dispute settlement under UNCLOS III. file://Users/michaelmax/Desktop/The%20International%20Tribunal%20for%20the%20Law%20of%20the%20Sea%20and%20Dispute%20Settlement%20under%20UNCLOS%20III%20-%20Part%20III.html
Fang WY, Lo KK (1996) A generalized well-management scheme for reservoir simulation. Paper SPE 29124 presented at the 13th SPE symposium on reservoir simulation, San Antonio, Texas, p 8
Larsen T, Nagoda D, Andersen JR (eds) (2001) The Barents sea Ecoregion. A biodiversity assessment. World Wild Life Fund, p 80
Max MD, Johnson AH (2011) Methane Hydrate/Clathrate Conversion. In: Khan MR (ed) Clean hydrocarbon fuel conversion technology. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy no. 19. ISBN 1 84569 727 8, ISBN-13: 978 1 84569 727 3. Woodhead Publishing Ltd. Cambridge, pp 413–434
Max MD, Johnson A, Dillon WP (2006) Economic geology of natural gas hydrate. Springer, Berlin, p 341
OGJ (2013) Methane hydrate test used special ESP. Oil Gas J. http://www.ogj.com/articles/2013/05/methane-hydrate-test-used-special-esp.html?cmpid=EnlLNGMay282013 (23 May 2013)
Paull CK, Matsumoto R, Wallace P et al (1996) Proceedings of the ocean drilling program. Initial reports 164, Ocean Drilling Program, College Station, TX, p 623
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Max, M.D., Johnson, A.H., Dillon, W.P. (2013). Oceanic NGH: Low Risk Resource in Fragile Arctic Environment. In: Natural Gas Hydrate - Arctic Ocean Deepwater Resource Potential. SpringerBriefs in Energy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02508-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02508-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02507-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02508-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)