Abstract
Objective: Pedicle screw fixation is frequently used in spinal orthopedic surgery. It is widely known that postmenopausal women suffer from a significant decrease their bone mineral density (BMD), which may significantly induce a higher risk of fixator failure. Therefore, this study mainly investigated the distribution of lumbar spine BMD at different anatomical regions among postmenopausal women of Asian. Methods: 30 healthy Chinese postmenopausal female volunteers were recruited. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) scan images were used, based on a 3D threshold segmentation algorithm, to separate the lumbar spine from the surrounding soft tissues. Based on the anatomy of the lumbar spine, each spine segments was divided into 7 anatomic regions based on the boundary lines of different anatomic regions in a 3-dimensional view, cortical and cancellous bone were segmented based on the threshold method. In addition, the average Hounsfield units (HU) for each region were acquired. Finally, the conversion between HU and BMD was performed based on individualized density asynchronous calibration. Results: The L1 segment of the lumbar spine had the lowest areal bone mineral density (aBMD) of all segments at 0.84 g/cm2 and volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) of 341.06 mg/cm3 (p < 0.001), and the BMD distribution among different segments shows a trend of L1 < L2 < L3 and L4. The lamina (L) of the lumbar spine had the highest vBMD at 540 mg/cm3, whereas the vBMD of the vertebral body (VB) was only about half that of the L at 278.81 mg/cm3. The transverse process (TP) had a vBMD of 293.52 mg/cm3 which is slightly higher than the VB region. To summarize, the distribution of vBMD among different anatomical regions of a single vertebral was presented as L > inferior articular process (IAP) > pedicle (P) > superior articular process (SAP) > spinous process (SP) > TP and VB (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The distribution of BMD in different segments of the lumbar spine showed an increasing trend of L1 < L2 < L3 and L4. The vBMD distribution in each region of the lumbar spine decreased sequentially with increasing distance from the center of intervertebral foramen. The L is the densest area of the lumbar spine, with the IAP being the second densest after the L, followed by the P and SAP. The BMD of SP, TP, and VB was found to be the lowest in the three regions further away from the center of intervertebral foramen. Compared with the P, the L has a higher vBMD, which may be more beneficial for the fixation of implants such as pedicle screws.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kanis, J.A.: Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. The Lancet 359(9321), 1929–1936 (2002)
Rachner, T.D., Khosla, S., Hofbauer, L.C.: Osteoporosis: now and the future. The Lancet 377(9773), 1276–1287 (2011)
Si, L., Winzenberg, T.M., Jiang, Q., Chen, M., Palmer, A.J.: Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China: 2010–2050. Osteoporos Int. 26, 1929–1937 (2015)
Roy-Camille, R., Saillant, G., Mazel, C.: Internal fixation of the lumbar spine with pedicle screw plating. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 203, 7–17 (1986)
Galbusera, F., Volkheimer, D., Reitmaier, S., Berger-Roscher, N., Kienle, A., Wilke, H.J.: Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur. Spine J. 24, 1005–1016 (2015)
Halvorson, T.L., Kelley, L.A., Thomas, K.A., Whitecloud, T.S., III, Cook, S.D.: Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine 19(21), 2415–2420 (1994)
Odeh, K., Rosinski, A., Leasure, J., Kondrashov, D.: Pedicle screws challenged: lumbar cortical density and thickness are greater in the posterior elements than in the pedicles. Glob. Spine J. 11(1), 34–43 (2021)
Hohn, E.A., Chu, B., Martin, A., Yu, E., Telles, C., Leasure, J., et al.: The pedicles are not the densest regions of the lumbar vertebrae: implications for bone quality assessment and surgical treatment strategy. Glob. Spine J. 7(6), 567–571 (2017)
Seeman, E., Delmas, P.D.: Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N. Engl. J. Med. 354(21), 2250–2261 (2006)
Armas, L.A., Recker, R.R.: Pathophysiology of osteoporosis: new mechanistic insights. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. 41(3), 475–486 (2012)
Simpson, M.L.: Human anatomy & physiology (2014)
Pickhardt, P.J., Pooler, B.D., Lauder, T., del Rio, A.M., Bruce, R.J., Binkley, N.: Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis using abdominal computed tomography scans obtained for other indications. Ann. Intern. Med. 158(8), 588–595 (2013)
Jang, S., Graffy, P.M., Ziemlewicz, T.J., Lee, S.J., Summers, R.M., Pickhardt, P.J.: Opportunistic osteoporosis screening at routine abdominal and thoracic CT: normative L1 trabecular attenuation values in more than 20,000 adults. Radiology 291(2), 360–367 (2019)
Bao, J., Zou, D., Li, W.: Characteristics of the DXA measurements in patients undergoing lumbar fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective analysis of over 1000 patients. Clin. Interventions Aging 1131–1137 (2021)
Tenne, M., McGuigan, F., Besjakov, J., Gerdhem, P., Åkesson, K.: Degenerative changes at the lumbar spine—implications for bone mineral density measurement in elderly women. Osteoporos Int. 24, 1419–1428 (2013)
Li, N., Li, X.M., Xu, L., Sun, W.J., Cheng, X.G., Tian, W.: Comparison of QCT and DXA: osteoporosis detection rates in postmenopausal women. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013 (2013)
Adams, J.E.: Quantitative computed tomography. Eur. J. Radiol. 71(3), 415–424 (2009)
Khoo, B.C.C., Brown, K., Cann, C., Zhu, K., Henzell, S., Low, V., et al.: Comparison of QCT-derived and DXA-derived areal bone mineral density and T scores. Osteoporos. Int. 20, 1539–1545 (2009)
Mao, S.S., Li, D., Syed, Y.S., Gao, Y., Luo, Y., Flores, F., et al.: Thoracic quantitative computed tomography (QCT) can sensitively monitor bone mineral metabolism: comparison of thoracic QCT vs lumbar QCT and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in detection of age-relative change in bone mineral density. Acad. Radiol. 24(12), 1582–1587 (2017)
Okano, I., Salzmann, S.N., Jones, C., Miller, C. O., Shirahata, T., Rentenberger, C., et al.: The impact of degenerative disc disease on regional volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) measured by quantitative computed tomography. Spine J. 20(2), 181–190 (2020)
Singer, K., Edmondston, S., Day, R., Breidahl, P., Price, R.: Prediction of thoracic and lumbar vertebral body compressive strength: correlations with bone mineral density and vertebral region. Bone 17(2), 167–174 (1995)
Anderst, W.J., Thorhauer, E.D., Lee, J.Y., Donaldson, W.F., Kang, J.D.: Cervical spine bone mineral density as a function of vertebral level and anatomic location. Spine J. 11(7), 659–667 (2011)
Garay, R.S., Solitro, G.F., Lam, K.C., Morris, R.P., Albarghouthi, A., Lindsey, R.W., et al.: Characterization of regional variation of bone mineral density in the geriatric human cervical spine by quantitative computed tomography. PLoS one 17(7), e0271187 (2022)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, M., Liu, S., Nie, Y., Jiang, W., Yew, J.K., Du, J. (2024). Is Lamina the Densest Region of the Lumbar Spine? An In Vivo Study Based on Asian Postmenopausal Women. In: Li, S. (eds) Computational and Experimental Simulations in Engineering. ICCES 2023. Mechanisms and Machine Science, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44947-5_79
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44947-5_79
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-44946-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-44947-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)