Skip to main content

Inclusivity & Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Inclusive Smart Museums
  • 136 Accesses

Abstract

Creating inclusive and accessible environments within cultural heritage institutions is a central focus of this chapter. The main arguments revolve around the implementation of practical strategies and tools to achieve this goal. Sensory kits are highlighted as valuable resources that provide visitors with sensory sensitivities and the necessary tools to engage with heritage spaces effectively. Social stories are presented as a structured framework that aids individuals in understanding and navigating social situations within cultural heritage contexts. The integration of sensory maps is discussed, emphasizing their role in assisting visitors with planning and navigating heritage sites by providing sensory information about the environment. Additionally, the chapter explores the design and implementation of immersive storymaps, which combine narrative elements with interactive experiences to deepen visitors’ connection to cultural heritage. Through the utilization of these innovative approaches, heritage professionals can create more inclusive and accessible environments, ultimately fostering a more engaging and meaningful experience for all visitors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, E. (2021). New light on ‘the viewer’: Sensing the Parthenon galleries in the British Museum. In Disability Studies and the Classical Body (pp. 130–159). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, E. P., Alexander, M., & Decker, J. (2017). Museums in motion: An introduction to the history and functions of museums. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A. (2019). Virtual reality, augmented reality and artificial intelligence in special education: A practical guide to supporting students with learning differences. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Arar, M., Jung, C., Awad, J., & Chohan, A. H. (2021). Analysis of smart home technology acceptance and preference for elderly in Dubai, UAE. Designs, 5(4), 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, D., & Buaud, A. (2003). Independent living for persons with disabilities 179 and elderly people. In M. Mokhtari (Ed.), Independent living for persons with disabilities and elderly people: ICOST’2003 1st International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics (Vol. 12, p. 179). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, D., Ossmann, R., Gaudy, T., & Miesenberger, K. (2007). Computer games and visually impaired people. Upgrade, 8(2), 43–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Authority, G. B. R. M. P. (2019). Great barrier reef outlook report 2019. Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandukda, M., Holloway, C., Singh, A., & Berthouze, N. (2020, October). PLACES: A framework for supporting blind and partially sighted people in outdoor leisure activities. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 1–13).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barakat, B., Hall, L., & Keates, S. (2022, June). Integrating machine learning with augmented reality for accessible assistive technologies. In Universal access in human-computer interaction. User and context diversity: 16th International Conference, UAHCI 2022, held as part of the 24th HCI International Conference, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part II (pp. 175–186). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bbosale, A., Benny, G., Jaison, R., Kbot, A., & Pati, S. (2019, January). Indoor navigation system using BLE beacons. In 2019 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaney, J. (2020). Autism through a sensory lens: Sensory assessment and strategies. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Avi, N., Almagor, M., & Engel-Yeger, B. (2012). Sensory processing difficulties and interpersonal relationships in adults: An exploratory study. Psychology, 3(01), 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Sasson, A., Hen, L., Fluss, R., Cermak, S. A., Engel-Yeger, B., & Gal, E. (2009). A meta-analysis of sensory modulation symptoms in individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berendsen, M. E., Hamerlinck, J. D., & Webster, G. R. (2018). Digital story mapping to advance educational atlas design and enable student engagement. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(3), 125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollini, A., Cocchi, E., Salvagno, V., & Gori, M. (2023). The causal role of vision in the development of spatial coordinates: Evidence from visually impaired children. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braden, C. (2016). Welcoming all visitors: Museums, accessibility, and visitors with disabilities. University of Michigan Working Papers in Museum Studies, p. i.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broomfield, K., Harrop, D., Jones, G. L., Sage, K., & Judge, S. (2022). A qualitative evidence synthesis of the experiences and perspectives of communicating using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC). Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camic, P. M., & Chatterjee, H. J. (2013). Museums and art galleries as partners for public health interventions. Perspectives in Public Health, 133(1), 66–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappucci, K. C. (2019). Marietta Pennsylvania Historic District & the Susquehanna National Heritage Area designation ArcGIS StoryMap.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, M. K. (2019). Seeing systems and the beholding eye: Computer-aided visions of the Postwar British landscape (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavazos Quero, L., Iranzo Bartolomé, J., & Cho, J. (2021). Accessible visual artworks for blind and visually impaired people: Comparing a multimodal approach with tactile graphics. Electronics, 10(3), 297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceraso, S. (2014). (Re)educating the senses: Multimodal listening, bodily learning, and the composition of sonic experiences. College English, 77(2), 102–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H. H. (2015). Which one helps tourists most? Perspectives of international tourists using different navigation aids. Tourism Geographies, 17(3), 350–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, J. D. (2021). A study of multi-sensory experience and color recognition in visual arts appreciation of people with visual impairment. Electronics, 10(4), 470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, L., Goddard, L., & Pring, L. (2009). Sensory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Autism, 13(3), 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crang, M., & Tolia-Kelly, D. P. (2010). Nation, race, and affect: Senses and sensibilities at national heritage sites. Environment and Planning A, 42(10), 2315–2331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demski-Hamelin, D. (2018). Curating heritage in the digital age: An exploration of how America’s national heritage areas are using technology to share their stories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J., Horn, M., & Uttal, D. H. (2016). Practical evaluation guide: Tools for museums and other informal educational settings. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eardley, A. F., Mineiro, C., Neves, J., & Ride, P. (2016). Redefining access: Embracing multimodality, memorability and shared experience in museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 59(3), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engel-Yeger, B., Palgy-Levin, D., & Lev-Wiesel, R. (2013). The sensory profile of people with post-traumatic stress symptoms. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health, 29(3), 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, Y., & Gärdenfors, D. (2005). Computer games for children with visual impairments. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 4(3), 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassoulas, C., Nikolakakis, E., & Staridas, S. (2022). Digital tools to serve geotourism and sustainable development at Psiloritis UNESCO Global Geopark in COVID times and beyond. Geosciences, 12(2), 78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-López, Á., Rodríguez-Fórtiz, M. J., Rodríguez-Almendros, M. L., & Martínez-Segura, M. J. (2013). Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers & Education, 61, 77–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T. S., Blake, A. B., & Shelffo, K. E. (2018). Can sensory gallery guides for children with sensory processing challenges improve their museum experience? Journal of Museum Education, 43(1), 66–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, T. S., Wiskera, E. S., Wilbur, L. H., & Garcia, N. M. (2022). The sensory totes programme: Sensory-friendly autism program innovations designed to meet COVID-19 challenges. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 78(1), 44–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, S. (2008). Multisensory rooms and environments: Controlled sensory experiences for people with profound and multiple disabilities. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. J. (2013). Making Rocky Mountain National Park: The environmental history of an American treasure. University Press of Kansas.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, G., & Morash, V. S. (2015, October). The tactile graphics helper: Providing audio clarification for tactile graphics using machine vision. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (pp. 97–106).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gacem, M. A., Alghlayini, S., Shehieb, W., Saeed, M., Ghazal, A., & Mir, M. (2019, December). Smart assistive glasses for Alzheimer’s patients. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Signal Processing and Information Technology (ISSPIT) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, D. (2003). Designing sound-based computer games. Digital Creativity, 14(2), 111–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garr, M., & Morgan, M. (2022). Student-centered immersive StoryMaps to build language and cultural proficiency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, S., Larson, S. D., Hefzi, H., Marnoy, Z., Cutforth, T., Dokka, K., & Baldwin, K. K. (2011). Sensory maps in the olfactory cortex defined by long-range viral tracing of single neurons. Nature, 472(7342), 217–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giaconi, C., Ascenzi, A., Del Bianco, N., D’Angelo, I., & Capellini, S. A. (2021). Virtual and augmented reality for the cultural accessibility of people with autism spectrum disorders: A pilot study. International Journal of the Inclusive Museum, 14(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginley, B. (2013). Museums: A whole new world for visually impaired people. Disability Studies Quarterly, 33(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goeman, M. (2008). (Re)mapping Indigenous presence on the land in Native women’s literature. American Quarterly, 60(2), 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T., & Panek, R. (2014). The autistic brain: Helping different kinds of minds succeed (p. 256). Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C. A. (1998). Social stories and comic strip conversations with students with Asperger syndrome and high-functioning autism. In Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism? (pp. 167–198).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, N., Christian, C., Nota, A., & Greenfield, P. (2015). 3D printing technology: A unique way of making hubble space telescope images accessible to non-visual learners. Journal of Blindness Innovation & Research, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halder, S., & Squires, G. (Eds.). (2023). Inclusion and diversity: Communities and practices across the world. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpenau, P. (2020). An organization-level occupational therapy consultation approach: Increasing art museum access for visitors with autism spectrum and sensory processing disorders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, S. (2022). Field trip for one: Self-directed learning with the# MetKids website# MetKids, the Metropolitan Museum of Art (2015). International Journal of Education Through Art, 18(2), 279–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harricharan, S., Nicholson, A. A., Densmore, M., Théberge, J., McKinnon, M. C., Neufeld, R. W., & Lanius, R. A. (2017). Sensory overload and imbalance: Resting-state vestibular connectivity in PTSD and its dissociative subtype. Neuropsychologia, 106, 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, A., & Ramkissoon, H. (2017). 10 augmented reality application to museum visitor experiences. Visitor Management in Tourism Destinations, 117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holloway, L., Marriott, K., Butler, M., & Borning, A. (2019, May). Making sense of art: Access for gallery visitors with vision impairments. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou, S. (2023). Making art accessible to all: Co-creating multi-sensory art with visually impaired people.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, F. E., & Stagg, S. D. (2016). How sensory experiences affect adolescents with an autistic spectrum condition within the classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 1656–1668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howland, M. D., Liss, B., Levy, T. E., & Najjar, M. (2020). Integrating digital datasets into public engagement through ArcGIS StoryMaps. Advances in Archaeological Practice, 8(4), 351–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., & Lau, N. (2020). Enhancing the smart tourism experience for people with visual impairments by gamified application approach through needs analysis in Hong Kong. Sustainability, 12(15), 6213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huston, V., & Hamburger, K. (2023). Navigation aid use and human wayfinding: How to engage people in active spatial learning. KI-Künstliche Intelligenz, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutson, J., & Hutson, P. (2023). Museums and the metaverse: Emerging technologies to promote inclusivity and engagement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jabbar, M. S., Lee, C. H., & Cho, J. D. (2021). ColorWatch: Color perceptual spatial tactile interface for people with visual impairments. Electronics, 10(5), 596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, M. (2023). Digital storytelling and user experience in online exhibition development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, B. (2023). Making dinosaurs dance. American Alliance of Museums.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi, S., & Iordanova, I. (2021). Integration of BIM and GIS for construction automation, a systematic literature review (SLR) combining bibliometric and qualitative analysis. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keil, J., Pujol, L., Roussou, M., Engelke, T., Schmitt, M., Bockholt, U., & Eleftheratou, S. (2013, October). A digital look at physical museum exhibits: Designing personalized stories with handheld augmented reality in museums. In 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage) (Vol. 2, pp. 685–688). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., & Khusro, S. (2021). An insight into smartphone-based assistive solutions for visually impaired and blind people: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 20, 265–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilian, J., Neugebauer, A., Scherffig, L., & Wahl, S. (2022). The unfolding space glove: A wearable spatio-visual to haptic sensory substitution device for blind people. Sensors, 22(5), 1859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnealey, M., Koenig, K. P., & Smith, S. (2011). Relationships between sensory modulation and social supports and health-related quality of life. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(3), 320–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, E., Caro, K., & Zhu, J. (2020). From immersion to metagaming: Understanding rewind mechanics in interactive storytelling. Entertainment Computing, 33, 100322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koseff, S. (2023). Tactile interpretations of historical embroidered patches: Methods and best practices (Doctoral dissertation, New York University Tandon School of Engineering).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunhoth, J., Karkar, A., Al-Maadeed, S., & Al-Ali, A. (2020). Indoor positioning and wayfinding systems: A survey. Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences, 10(1), 1–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuriakose, B., Shrestha, R., & Sandnes, F. E. (2022). Tools and technologies for blind and visually impaired navigation support: A review. IETE Technical Review, 39(1), 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, I. J. (2021). Kinect-for-windows with augmented reality in an interactive roleplay system for children with an autism spectrum disorder. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(4), 688–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leporini, B., Rossetti, V., Furfari, F., Pelagatti, S., & Quarta, A. (2020). Design guidelines for an interactive 3D model as a supporting tool for exploring a cultural site by visually impaired and sighted people. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS), 13(3), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • López Salas, E. (2021). A collection of narrative practices on cultural heritage with innovative technologies and creative strategies. Open Research Europe, 1, 130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loran, M. (2005). Use of websites to increase access and develop audiences in museums: Experiences in British national museums. Digithum, 7, 23–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, E., & Lipps, A. (Eds.). (2018). The senses: Design beyond vision. Chronicle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, K. (2019). Sensory maps. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melfi, G., Müller, K., Schwarz, T., Jaworek, G., & Stiefelhagen, R. (2020, April). Understanding what you feel: A mobile audio-tactile system for graphics used at schools with students with visual impairment. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L. J., Nielsen, D. M., Schoen, S. A., & Brett-Green, B. A. (2009). Perspectives on sensory processing disorder: A call for translational research. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. W., Moore, E. M., Roberts, E. J., Hachtel, K. W., & Brown, M. S. (2015). Sensory processing disorder in children ages birth–3 years born prematurely: A systematic review. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 69(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagud, M., Orero, P., & Matamala, A. (2020). Culture 4 all: Accessibility-enabled cultural experiences through immersive VR360 content. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 24(6), 887–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhiddinov, M., & Kim, S. Y. (2021). A systematic literature review on the automatic creation of tactile graphics for the blind and visually impaired. Processes, 9(10), 1726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, M., Baker, P. H., Murray-Slutsky, C., & Paris, B. (2009). Strategies for supporting the sensory-based learner. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 53(4), 245–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagib, W., & Williams, A. (2017). Toward an autism-friendly home environment. Housing Studies, 32(2), 140–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, D. O. (2015). The story in the mind: The effect of 3D gameplay on the structuring of written L2 narratives. ReCALL, 27(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nightingale, E., & Swallow, D. (2005). The arts of the Sikh kingdoms: Collaborating with a community. In Museums and Source Communities (pp. 66–82). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, C., Doyle, J. K., Lewis, K., & Treanor, D. (2023). Disabled students’ perception of the sensory aspects of the learning and social environments within one Higher Education Institution. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 86(5), 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olorunda, E., McCrindle, R., & Heath, P. (2022, June). Promoting reminiscence and social interaction through a multisensory toolkit–A non-pharmacological intervention for people living with dementia. In HCI International 2022 Posters: 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26–July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part IV (pp. 430–437). Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Padfield, N., Agius Anastasi, A., Camilleri, T., Fabri, S., Bugeja, M., & Camilleri, K. (2023). BCI-controlled wheelchairs: End-users’ perceptions, needs, and expectations, an interview-based study. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palivcová, D., Macík, M., & Míkovec, Z. (2020, April). Interactive tactile map as a tool for building spatial knowledge of visually impaired older adults. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Panagiotidi, M., Overton, P. G., & Stafford, T. (2018). The relationship between ADHD traits and sensory sensitivity in the general population. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 80, 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paratore, M. T., & Leporini, B. (2023). Exploiting the haptic and audio channels to improve orientation and mobility apps for the visually impaired. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parini, A., & Yus, F. (2023). The discursive construction of place through the online-offline interface. From physical locations to wikispaces. The Discursive Construction of Place in the Digital Age, 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersini, C. A., Miller, N. P., Gandhi, T. K., Gilad-Gutnick, S., Mahajan, V., Sinha, P., & Rokers, B. (2023). White matter plasticity following cataract surgery in congenitally blind patients. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(19), e2207025120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Percival, J. (2023). Autism friendly business: Neurodiverse customers. CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pionke, J. J. (2017). Toward holistic accessibility: Narratives from functionally diverse patrons. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 57(1), 48–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poonja, H. A., Shirazi, M. A., Khan, M. J., & Javed, K. (2023). Engagement detection and enhancement for STEM education through computer vision, augmented reality, and haptics. Image and Vision Computing, 104720.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, K. (2010). Making sense of place: Mapping as a multisensory research method. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(7), 539–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pressman, H., & Schulz, D. (2021). The art of access: A practical guide for museum accessibility. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujol, L., Katifori, A., Vayanou, M., Roussou, M., Karvounis, M., Kyriakidi, M., … & Ioannidis, Y. (2013). From personalization to adaptivity—Creating immersive visits through interactive digital storytelling at the Acropolis Museum. In Workshop Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (pp. 541–554). IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pujol, L., Roussou, M., Poulou, S., Balet, O., Vayanou, M., & Ioannidis, Y. (2012, March). Personalizing interactive digital storytelling in archaeological museums: The CHESS project. In 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (pp. 93–100). Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pye, E. (Ed.). (2016). The power of touch: Handling objects in museum and heritage context. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rappolt-Schlichtmann, G., & Daley, S. G. (2013). Providing access to engagement in learning: The potential of universal design for learning in museum design. Curator: The Museum Journal, 56(3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Real, S., & Araujo, A. (2019). Navigation systems for the blind and visually impaired: Past work, challenges, and open problems. Sensors, 19(15), 3404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, S., & Lane, S. J. (2008). Diagnostic validity of sensory over-responsivity: A review of the literature and case reports. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 516–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridha, A. M., & Shehieb, W. (2021, September). Assistive technology for hearing-impaired and deaf students utilizing augmented reality. In 2021 IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering (CCECE) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach Anleu, S., & Sarantoulias, G. (2022). Complex data and simple instructions: Social regulation during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Sociology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, M., Fiannaca, A. J., Kneisel, M., Cutrell, E., & Morris, M. R. (2019, October). Closing the gap: Designing for the last-few-meters wayfinding problem for people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (pp. 222–235).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse, C. (2017). Gateway to inclusion: Understanding the structure of early open autism events in museums (Doctoral dissertation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankar, S., Balamurugan, D., Brown, A., Ding, K., Xu, X., Low, J. H., et al. (2021). Texture discrimination with a soft biomimetic finger using a flexible neuromorphic tactile sensor array that provides sensory feedback. Soft Robotics, 8(5), 577–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartzman, R., & Knowles, C. (2022). Expanding accessibility: Sensory sensitive programming for museums. Curator: The Museum Journal, 65(1), 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seetharaman, K., Shepley, M. M., & Cheairs, C. (2021). The saliency of geographical landmarks for community navigation: A photovoice study with persons living with dementia. Dementia, 20(4), 1191–1212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sekhavat, Y. A., Azadehfar, M. R., Zarei, H., & Roohi, S. (2022). Sonification and interaction design in computer games for visually impaired individuals. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 81(6), 7847–7871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senier, S. (2018). Where a bird’s-eye view shows more concrete: Mapping indigenous LA for tribal visibility and reclamation. American Quarterly, 70(4), 941–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaligram, S. (2019). Accessibility in museums: Where are we and where are we headed (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simões, W. C., Machado, G. S., Sales, A. M., de Lucena, M. M., Jazdi, N., & de Lucena, V. F., Jr. (2020). A review of technologies and techniques for indoor navigation systems for the visually impaired. Sensors, 20(14), 3935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2012). Searching for “Community”: Making English rural history collections relevant today. Curator: The Museum Journal, 55(1), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, S. H., & Richards, D. P. (2020). Story mapping and sea level rise: Listening to global risks at street level. Communication Design Quarterly Review, 8(1), 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilhou, R., Taylor, V., & Crompton, H. (2020). 3D virtual reality in K-12 education: A thematic systematic review. Emerging Technologies and Pedagogies in the Curriculum, 169–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vayanou, M., Karvounis, M., Katifori, A., Kyriakidi, M., Roussou, M., & Ioannidis, Y. E. (2014, July). The CHESS project: Adaptive personalized storytelling experiences in museums. In UMAP Workshops.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, S. A., & Brewster, S. (2006). Sensory substitution using tactile pin arrays: Human factors, technology and applications. Signal Processing, 86(12), 3674–3695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, S. E., Hux, K., Knollman-Porter, K., Brown, J. A., Parisi, E., & Cain, R. (2022). Reading behaviors and text-to-speech technology perceptions of people with aphasia. Assistive Technology, 34(5), 599–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., & Jeon, M. (2023). Assistive technology for adults on the autism spectrum: A systematic survey. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, M. Y., & Wall, G. (2017). Visiting heritage museums with children: Chinese parents’ motivations. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 12(1), 36–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Y., Qin, T., Wu, Y., Yu, C., & Dong, W. (2022). How do voice-assisted digital maps influence human wayfinding in pedestrian navigation? Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 49(3), 271–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, M. (2020). Understanding everyday experiences of reminiscence for people living with blindness: Practices, tensions and probing new design possibilities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, M., Odom, W., & Berger, A. (2021, May). Understanding everyday experiences of reminiscence for people with blindness: Practices, tensions and probing new design possibilities. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zallio, M., & Clarkson, P. J. (2021). Inclusion, diversity, equity and accessibility in the built environment: A study of architectural design practice. Building and Environment, 206, 108352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X. (2023). A virtual reality application: Creating an alternative immersive experience for Dunhuang Mogao Cave visitors (Doctoral dissertation, Duke University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Y., Kupferstein, E., Rojnirun, H., Findlater, L., & Azenkot, S. (2020, April). The effectiveness of visual and audio wayfinding guidance on smartglasses for people with low vision. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 1–14).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hutson, J., Hutson, P. (2024). Inclusivity & Environment. In: Inclusive Smart Museums. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43615-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics