Skip to main content

Introduction: On the Economics of Music and the Finances of Great Composers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On Music, Money and Markets

Abstract

Although cultural economics has only very recently become a discipline of its own, questions as whether artistic performances could be really considered commodities have puzzled economists since long. This Introductory study reviews music throughout the History of Economic Thought, showing that—quite unexpectedly—it has been dealt with by authors of nearly all major schools of thought. It then analyses the evolution of the market for music from the seventeenth to the twentieth century, taking into account economic, political, sociological and technological changes. In addition, it briefly summarises the debates about whether or not arts—and music specifically—should be sponsored by governments. The Introduction ends with an overview of the chapters that make up the book, which studies the most famous composers’ finances from Bach and Händel to Falla and Stravinsky.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith (1909 [1776], p. 271).

  2. 2.

    Robbins (1935 [1932], pp. 8–9).

  3. 3.

    Cultural economics received professional recognition as a category of economic enquiry in 1992, when the American Economic Association added it to its “Classification of economic disciplines” (Peacock 1993, p. 2).

  4. 4.

    There is a consensus in considering the seminal—and now canonical—work by Baumol and Bowen (1965) the starting point of Cultural Economics. In it the authors apply what is known as Baumol's cost disease, that is, the rise of wages in jobs that have experienced little or no increase in labour productivity, in response to rising salaries in other jobs that have experienced higher productivity growth to performing arts. The point might be summarised as follows: it took the same number of musicians and time to play a Beethoven string quartet when the composers premiered it that now. That is, the productivity of classical music performance has not increased. However, the real wages of musicians have increased substantially since the nineteenth century. Apparently, this could only be compensated by rising prices for concert tickets—thus making them more exclusive—or by seeking additional ways of income such as subsidies, music recordings, merchandising, etc. (Baumol and Bowen 1965, p. 502). See for this also Baumol and Bowen (1966) and Towse (1997).

  5. 5.

    For more an overview on some more recent issues on music economics see Cameron (2016) as well as Sicca and Napolitano (2021).

  6. 6.

    It has to be recognized that Frey and Pommerehne (1989, pp. 141–142) touched—although very lightly—upon this matter.

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Plutarch’s Lives. The Translation Called Dryden’s. Corrected from the Greek and Revised by A.H. Clough. Liverpool: Henry Young, 1883.

  8. 8.

    Regarding the fact that all composers included in this study are males, it should be enough to point out that this is a historical work, and that the music composition business has been a nearly exclusively male one (although female singers were among the highest-paid musicians). However, there seems that any possible gender gap among musicians has currently shrunk in terms of market share: measured through the single charts, in 2018 the ten biggest acts spent a combined total of 638 weeks in the top 40, 310 of which (49%) were for songs featuring female artists. A market share that does not seem to have diminished since.

  9. 9.

    The Spanish term employed by Pacheco is ingenio, which has a slightly different meaning than genio.

  10. 10.

    According to (Santos 1976, p. 243) “the probabilities determining the expected returns by performing artists are subject not only to the scarcity of genius but also to the size of the net inflow into the performing arts and the perspicacity with which entrants judge their own training and abilities. For example, other things equal, a sudden influx of stage-stuck dilletantes would diminish the probability of a large income, thereby reducing the income expected from such pursuits.”

  11. 11.

    Scherer (2006), drawing on a survey of 646 musicians born between 1650 and 1849 found the Austrian Empire to be the most intensive employer of composer–musicians per million population and also to have given birth to the largest number of composers relative to its population. The former Czechoslovakia was second in births while Germany was second in employment.

  12. 12.

    Unlike Luther, Zwingly (as well as Cromwell) banished music from churches.

  13. 13.

    See for this the three volumes on the Bourgeois Virtues, Dignity and Equality by McCloskey (2006, 2010, 2016).

  14. 14.

    Two explanations for the “superstar” phenomenon—one referring to the demand, the other to the supply side—are pointed out by the authors: (a) The preferences of art consumers are such that they are unwilling to substitute a lesser talent for a greater talent. A succession of mediocre singers, for instance, does not add up to a first-rate performance. […] This unwillingness to substitute easily among talents leads to a relative rise in demand for and income of the superstar, going beyond what may be attributed to pure talent. (b) The second explanation for the huge incomes of superstars compared with other artists may be attributed to technology […]. Owing the modern media, a performer must make more or less the same effort whether there is an audience of 100, 1,000 or 100,000. The cost of production does not rise in proportion to the size of the market.

  15. 15.

    Beethoven aiming at the top-end market, sold subscriptions for manuscript copies of his scores (see Chapter 4).

  16. 16.

    For a definition of “bourgeois” see McCloskey (2006, pp. 68 ff).

  17. 17.

    As the design of the new pianoforte allowed for a stronger and louder sound, performers could now play in bigger halls and before larger audiences, thus allowing concerts to become economically more rentable. This implied that soon string instruments would also require a redesign to keep up with the enhanced sound of the piano (cf. Schoenbaum 2012).

  18. 18.

    It should be noted that music publishers often obtained musical manuscripts through the copyist and other workers involved in the elaboration of the scores, which they then printed and sold without the composer’s permission, and usually with many mistakes in the transcriptions.

  19. 19.

    The Journal of Cultural Economics dedicated in 1995 a special issue (nº 19) to this topic.

  20. 20.

    For an extensive study about the role of recording technologies on music through the example of the recordings of pieces by Bach, see Elie (2012).

  21. 21.

    Of course, there are notable exceptions as, for example, Wagner managed quite well while being sponsored by Ludwig II of Bavaria.

  22. 22.

    Market-oriented efforts, however, tended to be reduced as composers achieved a comfortable level of affluence (Scherer 2004, p. 89). This author also points out (ibid., p. 198) that those who served as court Kapellmeister or received outright court subsidies were more productive than those who lacked such positions.

  23. 23.

    In this point we disagree with Scherer (2004, p. 201) who affirms that Mozart and Schubert died “in abject poverty”. We conclude that, at the time of his death, Mozart simply had a cash problem, which was solved shortly afterwards. Obviously, many others out of the bulk of musicians not included in this book might have struggled hard to make ends meet.

  24. 24.

    He does so in his very suggestive article “To the immense minority” (El Sol, 26th of December 1935, p. 7).

  25. 25.

    Based on the novel Scènes de la vie de bohème (1851) by Henri Murger.

  26. 26.

    Also, the composers of the “national schools” such as Tchaikovsky, Grieg and Sibelius might be underrepresented.

  27. 27.

    How much money would classical composers have earned on Spotify? Classic FM. https://www.classicfm.com/music-news/classical-composers-have-earned-on-spotify/ (accessed July 2023).

  28. 28.

    We are purposely careful with our statements regarding streams, downloads, etc., due to the continues changes and high volatility in the data series of online media.

  29. 29.

    It is easy to find these figures in any of the numerous books on practical banking and commerce that were published at the time. I have used Castaño (1871).

References

  • Aunós, Eduardo. 1952. El trabajo intelectual. Madrid: Viuda de Galo Sáez.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliscianio, Márcia L., and Steven G. Medema. 1999. Positive Science, Normative Man: Lionel Robbins and the Political Economy of Arts. In Economic Engagement with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31 History of Political Economy, ed. Neil de Marchi and Craufurd D.W. Goodwin. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William W., and William G. Bowen. 1965. On Performing Arts: The Anatomy of Their Economic Problem. The American Economic Review 55 (12): 495–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., and William G. Bowen. 1966. Performing Arts—The Economic Dilemma: A Study of problems Common to Theatre, Opera; Music, and Dance. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, William J., and Hilda Baumol. 1994. On the Economics of Musical Composition in Mozart’s Vienna. Journal of Cultural Economics 18: 171–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Atar, Doron S. 2004. Trade Secrets. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetto XVI. 2023. Musica e liturgia. In Che cos’è il Cristianesimo. Milano: Mondadori.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 1962. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, ed. J. Browning. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanning, Tim. 2008. The Triumph of Music: The Rise of Composers, Musicians and Their Art. Boston: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Samuel. 2016. Past, Present and Future: Music Economics at the Crossroads. Journal of Cultural Economics 40: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elie, Paul. 2012. Reinventing Bach. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantel, Hans. 1971. Johann Strauss: Father and Son and Their Era. New Abbott: David & Charles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S. 2000. Arts & Economics. Analysis & Cultural Policy. Berlin et al.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Bruno S., and Werner W. Pommerehne. 1989. Muses and Markets. Explorations in the Economics of Arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridén, Bertil. 1999. The Problem of Unique Goods as Factors of Productio: Rousseau on Art and the Economy. In Economic Engagement with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31 History of Political Economy, ed. Neil de Marchi and Craufurd D.W. Goodwin. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburgh, Victor. 2021. Economics of the Arts, Art History and Art Philosophy: A Very Subjective View. In La economía de la cultura: una disciplina joven. Estudios en homenaje al profesor Víctor Fernández Blanco, ed. L.C. Herrero Prieto and J. Prieto Rodríguez. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Oviedo

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, Crauford. 2006. Art and Culture in the History of Economic Thought. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, vol. I, ed. Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby. Amsterdam et al.: Northholland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, Dieter. 1985. Pianoforte. Das Klavier im 19, Jahrhundert. München: Carl Hauser Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klamer, Arjo. 1996. The Value of Culture. In The Value of Culture. On the Relationship Between Economics and Arts, ed. Arjo Klamer. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, Jerold. 2014. Values of Music. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, vol. II, ed. Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby. Amsterdam et al.: Northholland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas, Harro. 1999. Pacifying the Workman: Ruskin and Jevons on Labour and Popular Culture. In Economic Engagement with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31 History of Political Economy, ed. Neil de Marchi and Craufurd D.W. Goodwin. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, Klaus-Rüdiger. 2013. Die Bachs, Eine deutsche Familie. Berlin: Propyläen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, Nicholas. 2022. The Haydn Economy. Music, Aesthetics, and Commerce in the late Eighteenth Century. Chicago & London: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2006. The Bourgeois Virtues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2010. Bourgeois Dignity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, Deirdre N. 2016. Bourgeois Equity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosselmans, Bert, and Ernest Mathijs. 1999. Jevon’s Music Manuscript and the Political Economy of Music. In Economic Engagement with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31 History of Political Economy, ed. Neil de Marchi and Craufurd D.W. Goodwin. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negrón, Zarinés. 1999. Francisco Pacheco: Economist for the Art World. In Economic Engagement with Art. Annual Supplement to Volume 31 History of Political Economy, ed. Neil de Marchi and Craufurd D.W. Goodwin. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noltze, Holger. 2013. Liebestod: Wagner - Verdi - Wir. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dea, Michael. 1994. Rousseau contre Rameu: Musique et nature dans les articles pour l’Encyclopédie et au-delà. Recherches sur Diderot et sur l’Encyclopédie 17: 133–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Dea, Michael. 1995. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Music, Illusion and Desire. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacheco, Francisco. 1649. Arte de la pintura. Sevilla: Simón Faxardo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan. 1993. Paying the Piper: Culture, Music and Money. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, Alan. 2006. The Arts and Economic Policy. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, vol. I, ed. Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby. Amsterdam et al.: Northholland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillipson, Nicholas. 2011. Adam Smith. An Enlightened Life. London: Pinguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1935 [1932]. An Essay on the Nature and Significance of Economic Science. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1963. The Art and the State. In Politics and Economics: Papers in Political Economy, ed. Lord Robbins. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1971. Autobiography of an Economists. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, Lionel. 1976. Unsettled Questions in the Political Economy of the Arts. In The Economics of the Arts, ed. Mark Blaug. London: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruskin, John. 1867. The Political Economy of Art. London: Smith, Elder and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar, Adolfo. 1935. La música actual en Europa y sus problemas. Madrid: Yagüe Editor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, F.P. 1976. Risk Uncertainty and the Performing Artist. In The Economics of the Arts, ed. Mark Blaug. London: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. 2001. The Evolution of Free-Lance Music Composition, 1650–1900. Journal of Cultural Economics 25: 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. 2004. Quarter Notes and Bank Notes: The Economics of Music Composition in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, Frederic M. 2006. The Evolution of Music Markets. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, vol. I, ed. Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby. Amsterdam et al.: Northholland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoenbaum, David. 2012. The Violin: A Social History of the World’s Most Versatile Instrument. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, J.L. 1978. The Consumption of Music: Integrating Aesthetics and Economics. Journal of Cultural Economics 2 (2): 13–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicca, Luigi Maria, and Domenico Napolitano. 2021. For a Theory of Music Economics. Economia della Cultura 4: 589–602.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonton, Dean K. 2014. Creative Genius in Literature, Music, and the Visual Arts. In Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, vol. II, ed. Victor A. Ginsburgh and David Throsby. Amsterdam et al.: Northholland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, Robert. 1986. John Maynard Keynes: Hopes Betrayed, 1883–1920. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, Robert. 1992. John Maynard Keynes: The Economist as Saviour, 1920–1937. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidelsky, Robert. 2000. John Maynard Keynes: Fighting for Freedom, 1937–1946. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1909 [1776]. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. The Harvard Classics. New York: Collier & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Adam. 1976 [1759]. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamp, Josiah. 1929. Aesthetics as Economic Factor. In Some Economic Factors in Modern Life, Josiah Stamp. London: P. S. King & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George, and Gary Becker. 1977. De gustibus non est disputandem. American Economic Review 67: 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth. 1996. Market Value and Artist’s Earnings. In The Value of Culture. On the Relationship Between Economics and Arts, ed. Arjo Klamer. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth. 1997. Baumol’s Cost Decease: The Arts and Other Victims. Aldershot: Edward England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Towse, Ruth. 2020. A Textbook of Cultural Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max. 1921. Die rationalen und soziologischen Grundlagen der Musik. München: Drei Masken.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner, Manfred. 1999. Musik und Mammon. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Baumert .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baumert, T., Cabrillo, F. (2023). Introduction: On the Economics of Music and the Finances of Great Composers. In: Baumert, T., Cabrillo, F. (eds) On Music, Money and Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-43226-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics