Skip to main content

Surgical Release for Clubfoot: Principles, Indications, and Evaluation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clubfoot and Vertical Talus
  • 178 Accesses

Abstract

Comprehensive surgical release served as the standard for many cases of clubfoot from 1970 to 1990. During that period, surgical procedures were refined, and many studies were published. However, with improved understanding and practice of the Ponseti techniques since the 1990s, the comprehensive release became less popular. While the Ponseti Method has proven to be quite effective in treating both the idiopathic and the syndromic clubfoot, recurrences, incomplete correction, and progressive deformity can present. It is important to recognize the importance and power in serial casting of the recurrent deformity to minimize grandiose surgical exposures. Still, there are a small percentage of clubfeet that fail the Ponseti method and require surgical procedures. It is incumbent upon the pediatric orthopedic surgeon to be familiar with the detailed anatomy of the child’s foot and to understand the art of releasing just the right amount to correct the deformity. One should avoid any iatrogenic complication, such as neurovascular injury and articular cartilage damage.

The Cincinnati incision is the approach of choice for clubfoot release as it is versatile in visualizing the whole structure of the clubfoot deformity. Gentle handling of the soft tissue is essential. The ideal progression of the release should be from posterior to lateral, then plantar and medial. It is necessary to protect the neurovascular structures at the posterior medial corner. External rotation of the calcaneus under the talus is essential when the release is done. Care is taken to not overlengthen the Achilles tendon. The corrected position can be stabilized and maintained with Kirschner wire fixation to pin the talonavicular joint in a reduced position. Observe the tension of the posterior part of skin to prevent skin sloughing.

After any kind of clubfoot treatment, it is important to evaluate the functional outcome to track the progress and provide adequate follow-up care if required. This includes physical examination, measurement of plantar flexor strength, plain radiographs, and gait analysis. Outcomes can be tracked with instruments such as the International Clubfoot Study Group (ICFSG) Scoring System and other Quality of Life Outcomes Self-Assessment. In essence, extended follow-up is key to evaluate for improved functional outcomes and maintenance of a plantigrade foot.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Brockman EP. Congenital club foot (talipes equinovarus). Bristol: J. Wright and Sons; 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Turco VJ. Surgical correction of the resistant clubfoot. One-stage posteromedial release with internal fixation: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1971;53(3):477–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turco VJ. Resistant congenital club foot–one-stage posteromedial release with internal fixation. A follow-up report of a fifteen-year experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979;61(6):805–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crawford AH, Marxen JL, Osterfeld DL. The Cincinnati incision: a comprehensive approach for surgical procedures of the foot and ankle in childhood. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1982;64(9):1355–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McKay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment: section I-principles and morbid anatomy. J Pediatr Orthop. 1982;2(4):347–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McKay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment: section III–evaluation and results. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3(2):141–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McKay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment: section II–correction of the clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 1983;3(1):10–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simons GW. Complete subtalar release in club feet. Part II–comparison with less extensive procedures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1056–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simons GW. Complete subtalar release in club feet. Part I–a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985;67(7):1044–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bensahel H, Csukonyi Z, Desgrippes Y, Chaumien JP. Surgery in residual clubfoot: one-stage medioposterior release “a la carte”. J Pediatr Orthop. 1987;7(2):145–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ponseti IV, Smoley EN. Congenital club foot: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1963;45:261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(5):986–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith PA, Kuo KN, Graf AN, Krzak J, Flanagan A, Hassani S, Caudill AK, Dietz FR, Morcuende J, Harris JF. Long-term results of comprehensive clubfoot release versus the Ponseti method: which is better? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(4):1281–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuo KN, Smith PA. Correcting residual deformity following clubfoot releases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(5):1326–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuo KN, Hennigan SP, Hastings ME. Anterior tibial tendon transfer in residual dynamic clubfoot deformity. J Pediatr Orthop. 2001;21(1):35–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuo KN, Jansen LD. Rotatory dorsal subluxation of the navicular: a complication of clubfoot surgery. J Pediatr Orthop. 1998;18(6):770–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yong SM, Smith PA, Kuo KN. Dorsal bunion after clubfoot surgery: outcome of reverse Jones procedure. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(7):814–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dietz FR, Tyler MC, Leary KS, Damiano PC. Evaluation of a disease-specific instrument for idiopathic clubfoot outcome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467(5):1256–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Bensahel H, Kuo KN, Duhaime M. Outcome evaluation of the treatment of clubfoot: the international language of clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003;12:269.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Meary R. On the measurement of the angle between the talus and the first metatarsal: symposium. Rev Chir Orthop. 1967;53:389–467.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16(4):494–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Theologis TN, Harrington ME, Thompson N, Benson MK. Dynamic foot movement in children treated for congenital talipes equinovarus. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003;85(4):572–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kidder SM, Abuzzahab FS Jr, Harris GF, Johnson JE. A system for the analysis of foot and ankle kinematics during gait. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1996;4(1):25–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Saraswat P, MacWilliams BA, Davis RB. A multi-segment foot model based on anatomically registered technical coordinate systems: method repeatability in pediatric feet. Gait Posture. 2012;35(4):547–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jameson EG, Davids JR, Anderson JP, Davis RB 3rd, Blackhurst DW, Christopher LM. Dynamic pedobarography for children: use of the center of pressure progression. J Pediatr Orthop. 2008;28(2):254–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rankine L, Long J, Canseco K, Harris GF. Multisegmental foot modeling: a review. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2008;36(2-3):127–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MacWilliams BA, Cowley M, Nicholson DE. Foot kinematics and kinetics during adolescent gait. Gait Posture. 2003;17(3):214–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cheung G, Zalzal P, Bhandari M, Spelt JK, Papini M. Finite element analysis of a femoral retrograde intramedullary nail subject to gait loading. Med Eng Phys. 2004;26(2):93–108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheung JT, An KN, Zhang M. Consequences of partial and total plantar fascia release: a finite element study. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(2):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cheung JT, Zhang M. A 3-dimensional finite element model of the human foot and ankle for insole design. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):353–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheung JT, Zhang M, Leung AK, Fan YB. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the foot during standing–a material sensitivity study. J Biomech. 2005;38(5):1045–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Gibbs JC, Giangregorio LM, Wong AKO, Josse RG, Cheung AM. Appendicular and whole body lean mass outcomes are associated with finite element analysis-derived bone strength at the distal radius and tibia in adults aged 40 years and older. Bone. 2017;103:47–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu J, Cheung JT, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Leung AK, Zhang M. Development of a finite element model of female foot for high-heeled shoe design. Clin Biomech. 2008;23(Suppl):31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gefen A, Megido-Ravid M, Itzchak Y, Arcan M. Biomechanical analysis of the three-dimensional foot structure during gait: a basic tool for clinical applications. J Biomech Eng. 2000;122(6):630–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, et al. OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54(11):1940–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Graf A, Hassani S, Krzak J, Long J, Caudill A, Flanagan A, Eastwood D, Kuo KN, Harris G, Smith P. Long-term outcome evaluation in young adults following clubfoot surgical release. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010;30(4):379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Graf A, Wu KW, Smith PA, Kuo KN, Krzak J, Harris G. Comprehensive review of the functional outcome evaluation of clubfoot treatment: a preferred methodology. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2012;21(1):20–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Graf AN, Kuo KN, Kurapati NT, Krzak JJ, Hassani S, Caudill AK, Flanagan A, Harris GF, Smith PA. A long-term follow-up of young adults with idiopathic clubfoot: does foot morphology relate to pain? J Pediatr Orthop. 2017;39(10):527–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuo, K.N., Smith, P.A., Graf, A. (2023). Surgical Release for Clubfoot: Principles, Indications, and Evaluation. In: Dobbs, M.B., Johari, A.N., Williams, M.L. (eds) Clubfoot and Vertical Talus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34788-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34788-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34786-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34788-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics