Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Introduction and State of the Art

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Numerical Tool for the Analysis of Bioinspired Aquatic Locomotion

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 110 Accesses

Abstract

Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) are increasing in popularity because they can explore the ocean’s depths and perform operations without risking human life, and their applications range from search and rescue to scientific research and military operations. However, despite recent progress, AUVs still have worse swimming capabilities than fishes. The locomotion strategies of fishes have achieved outstanding swimming performances because they have evolved through natural selection for millions of years, so investigating how fishes propel themselves is of great interest to exploit the same mechanism for AUV propulsion. An effective bioinspired design cannot be carried out by blindly copying all the characteristics of fish locomotion, but it should be based on a deep understanding of the underlying physical principles that make fish swim so efficiently. Fish swimming is a complex phenomenon involving the unsteady fluid dynamics of a deformable moving body immersed in water, and advanced numerical tools are needed to figure out the mechanism of fish propulsion. In this chapter, the most popular numerical methods used to analyze fish swimming are described, and the main novel aspects of the proposed technique based on an overset grid are introduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bogue R (2015) Underwater robots: a review of technologies and applications. Ind Robot: An Int J 42(3):186–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sahoo A, Dwivedy SK, Robi PS (2019) Advancements in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle. Ocean Eng 181:145–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fish FE (2020) Advantages of aquatic animals as models for bio-inspired drones over present AUV technology. Bioinspiration & Biom 15:025001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gordon MS, Blickhan R, Dabiri JO, Videler JJ (2017) Animal locomotion: physical principles and adaptations. CRC Press—Taylor & Francis Group

    Google Scholar 

  5. Newman JN, Wu TY (1974) Swimming and flying in nature—volume 2. In: Wu TY, Brokaw CJ, Brennen C (eds), Proceedings of the second half of the symposium on swimming and flying in nature, vol 2

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sfakiotakis M, Lane DM, Davies J (1999) Review of fish swimming modes for aquatic locomotion. IEEE J Ocean Eng 24(2):237–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Salazar R, Fuentes V, Abdelkefi A (2018) Classification of biological and bioinspired aquatic systems: a review. Ocean Eng 148:75–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buren T, Floryan D, Smits A (2020) Bioinspired underwater propulsors. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Videler JJ, Wardle CS (1991) Fish swimming stride by stride: speed limits and endurance. Rev Fish Biol Fish 1:23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lighthill MJ (1969) Hydromechanics of aquatic animal propulsion. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 1:413–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lighthill MJ (1969) Note on the swimming of slender fish. J Fluid Mech 9:305–317

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Webb PW (1975) Hydrodynamics and energetics of fish propulsion. Department of the Environment Fisheries and Marine Services of Canada

    Google Scholar 

  13. Videler JJ (1995) Body surface adaptations to boundary-layer dynamics. Symposia Soc Exp Biol 49:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  14. Miklosovic D, Murray M, Howle L, Fish F (2004) Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (megaptera novaeangliae) flippers. Phys Fluids 16(39)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Daniel TL (1981) Fish mucus: in situ measurements of polymer drag reduction. Biol Bull 160(3)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fish FE, Schreiber CM, Moored KW, Liu G, Dong H, Bart-Smith H (2016) Hydrodynamic performance of aquatic flapping: efficiency of underwater flight in the manta. Aerospace 3(20):3030020

    Google Scholar 

  17. Su Z, Yu J, Tan M, Zhang J (2014) Implementing flexible and fast turning maneuvers of a multijoint robotic fish. IEEE/ASME Trans Mechatron 19(1)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weihs D (1973) The mechanism of rapid starting of slender fish. Biorheology 10:343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parson JM, Fish FE, Nicastro AJ (2011) Turning performance of batoids: limitations of a rigid body. J Exp Marine Biol Ecol 402:12–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jastrebsky RA, Bartol IK, Krueger PS (2016) Turning performance in squid and cuttlefish: unique dual-mode, muscular hydrostatic systems. J Exp Biol 219:1317–1326

    Google Scholar 

  21. Walker JA (2000) Does a rigid body limit maneuverability? J Exp Biol 203:3391–3396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang X, Liang S (2019) Maneuverability analysis of a novel portable modular AUV. Math Probl Eng

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carlton J (2012) Marine propellers and propulsion. Butterworth-Heinemann

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bar-Cohen Y (2011) Biomimetics: nature based innovation. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hale ME, Galdston S, Arnold BW, Song C (2022) The water to land transition submerged: multifunctional design of pectoral fins for use in swimming and in association with underwater substrate. Integr Comp Biol 62(4):908–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fish FE, Beneseki JT (2013) Evolution and bio-inspired design: natural limitations. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liu Y, Jiang H (2022) Research development on fish swimming. Chinese J Mech Eng 35(114)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Liao JC, Beal DN, Lauder GV, Triantafyllou MS (2003) Fish exploiting vortices decrease muscle activity. Science 302:1566–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Liao JC (2007) A review of fish swimming mechanics and behaviour in altered flows. Phylosophical Trans R Soc B 362:1973–1993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lauder GV (2000) Function of the caudal fin during locomotion in fishes; kinematics, flow visualization, and evolutionary patterns. Am Zoolog 40:101–122

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tytell ED, Lauder GV (2004) The hydrodynamics of eel swimming: I. Wake structure. J Exp Biol 207(11):1825–1841

    Google Scholar 

  32. Clark RP, Smits AJ (2006) Thrust production and wake structure of a batoid-inspired oscillating fin. J Fluid Mech 562:415–429

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Thandiackal R, Lauder GV (2020) How zebrafish turn: analysis of pressure force dynamics and mechiancal work. J Exp Biol 223

    Google Scholar 

  34. Flammang BE, Porter ME (2011) Bioinspiration: applying mechanical design to experimental biology. Integr Comp Biol 51(1):128–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ramamurti R, Lohner R, Sandberg WC (1999) Computation of the 3-d unsteady flow past deforming geometries. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 13:83–99

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Ebrahimi M, Abbaspour M (2015) Numerical investigation of the forward and backward travelling waves through an undulating propulsor: performance and wake pattern. Ships Offshore Struct

    Google Scholar 

  37. Liu H, Wasserug R, Kawachi K (1997) The three-dimensional hydrodynamics of tadpole locomotion. J Exp Biol 200:2807–2819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen W, Wu Z, Liu J, Shi S, Zhou Y (2011) Numerical simulation of batoid locomotion. J Hydrodyn 23(5):594–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Safari H, Abbaspour M, Darbandi M (2021) Numerical study to evaluate the important parameters affecting the hydrodynamic performance of manta ray’s in flapping motion. Appl Ocean Res 109:102559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Fouladi K, Coughlin DJ (2021) CFD investigation of trout-like configuration holding station near an obstruction. Fluids 6(204)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Doi K, Takagi T, Mitsunaga Y, Torisawa S (2020) Hydrodynamical effect of parallelly swimming fish using computational fluid dynamics method. PLoS One 16(5):e0250837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Li N, Liu H, Su Y (2017) Numerical study on the hydrodynamics of thunniform bio-inspired swimming under self-propulsion. PLoS One 12(3):e0174740

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Li R, Xiao Q, Liu Y, Liu L, Liu H (2020) Computational investigation on a self-propelled pufferfish driven by multiple fins. Ocean Eng 197:106908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Gilmanov A, Sotiropoulos F (2005) A hybrid cartesian/immersed boundary method for simulating flows with 3d, geometrically complex, moving bodies. J Comput Phys 207:457–492

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2008) Numerical investigation of the hydrodynamics of carangiform swimming in the rtansitional and inertial flow regimes. J Exp Biol 211:1541–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Borazjani I, Sotiropoulos F (2010) On the role of form and kinematics on the hydrodynamics of self-propelled body/caudal fin swimming. J Exp Biol 23(89–107)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Borazjani I, Daghooghi M (2012) The fish tail motion forms an attached leading edge vortex. Proc R Soc B 280:20122071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Dong H, Bozkurttas M, Mittal R, Madden P, Lauder GV (2010) Computational modelling and analysis of the hydrodynamics of a highly deformable fish pectoral fin. J Fluid Mech 645:345–373

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Maertens AP, Triantafyllou MS, Yue DKP (2015) Efficiency of fish propulsion. Bioinspiration & Biomim 10:046013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bottom RG, Borazjani I, Blevins EL, Lauder GV (2016) Hydrodynamics of swimming in stingrays: numerical simulations and the role of the leading-edge vortex. J Fluid Mech 788:407–443

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  51. Cui Z, Yang Z, Jiang H (2020) Sharp interface immersed boundary method for simulating three-dimensional swimming fish. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 14(1):534–544

    Google Scholar 

  52. Thekkethil N, Sharma A, Agrawal A (2020) Three-dimensional biological hydrodynamics study on various types of batoid fishlike locomotion. Phys Rev Fluids 5:023101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Gupta S, Agrawal A, Hourigan K, Thompson MC, Sharma A (2022) Anguilliform and carangiform fish-inspired hydrodynamic study for an undulating hydrofoil: effect of shape and adaptive kinematics. Phys Rev Fluids 7(9):094102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. van Noordt W, Ganju S, Brehm C (2022) An immersed boundary method for wall-modeled large-eddy simulation of turbulent high-mach-number flows. J Comput Phys 111583

    Google Scholar 

  55. Vreman AW (2020) Immersed boundary and overset grid methods assessed for stokes flow due to an oscillating sphere. J Comput Phys 423:109783

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Li G, Muller UK, van Leeuwen JL, Liu H (2012) Body dynamics and hydrodynamics of swiming fish larvae: a computational study. J Exp Biol 215:4015–4033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Li G, Kolomenskiy D, Thiria B, Godoy-Diana R (2019) On the interference of vorticity and pressure fields of a minimal fish school. J Aero Aqua Bio-Mech 8(1):27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu J, Yu F, He B, Yan T (2022) Hydrodynamic numerical simulation and prediction of bionic fish based computational fluid dynamics and multilayered perceptron. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 16(1):858–878

    Google Scholar 

  59. Xu Y, Wan D (2022) Numerical simulation of fish swimming with rigid pectoral fins. J Hydrodyn 24(2)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yan L, Chang X, Tian R, Wang N, Zhang L, Liu W (2020) A numerical simulation method for bionic fish self-propelled swimming under control based on deep reinforcement learning. Fluid Mech 234(17):3397–3415

    Google Scholar 

  61. Sumikawa H, Naraoka Y, Fukue T, Miyoshi T (2022) Changes in rays’ swimming stability due to the phase difference between left and right pectoral fin movements. Nat Sci Rep 12:2362

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dipartimento di Meccanica, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy

    Giovanni Bianchi

Authors
  1. Giovanni Bianchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Bianchi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bianchi, G. (2023). Introduction and State of the Art. In: A Numerical Tool for the Analysis of Bioinspired Aquatic Locomotion. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30548-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-30548-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-30547-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-30548-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation