Skip to main content

Abstract

Airway manipulation in high-risk infections poses significant threat to intensivists and anaesthesiologists. Proper precautions at the patient’s or the healthcare provider’s end with environmental modifications in the intensive care unit or operation theatre design are vital to prevent spread of infections. Pre-oxygenation should avoid positive pressure and cough and gag reflexes should be blunted by medicines before manipulating the airway. Use of personal protective equipment is a must and crash intubation should always be avoided. Airway management should be preferably be done by most experienced of the team and use of video laryngoscopes or video-assisted intubating stylets are suggested to minimise the proximity of airway handler to patient’s face. Tube position confirmation should be by end-tidal capnography and auscultation should be avoided. Filters and closed suction should be used. Use of intubation boxes, plastic drapes or tents, negative airflow tents have been described for aerosol containment. All aerosol-generating procedures should ideally be performed in negative pressure (<−5 Pa) isolation rooms having at least 12 air exchanges per hour. Biomedical waste generated during intubation should be optimally disposed. Following proper protocols may help to minimise the chances of airway handler getting infected. However, regular review of protocols based on staff’s feedback is vital for continuous quality improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tran K, Cimon K, Severn M, Pessoa-Silva CL, Conly J. Aerosol-generating procedures and risk of transmission of acute respiratory infections to healthcare workers: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2012;7:e35797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. British Thoracic Society, British Infection Society, Health Protection Agency. British Thoracic Society Hospital Management of adults with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) if SARS re-emerges – updated. London: British Thoracic Society; 2004. Accessed 18 Nov 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization (WHO). Epidemic and pandemic-prone acute respiratory diseases – infection prevention and control in health care: aide memoire. Geneva: WHO; 2008. Accessed 2010 Nov 18

    Google Scholar 

  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Public health guidance for community-level preparedness and response to severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). Supplement I: infection control in healthcare, home, and community settings. Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2005. Accessed 18 Nov 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lim WY, Wong P, Ong SGK. Reducing droplet spread during airway manipulation. Reply to Au Yong and colleagues. Br J Anaesth. 2020, 125:e178–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thiruvenkatarajan V, Wong DT, Kothandan H, Sekhar V, Adhikary SD, Currie J, Van Wijk RM. Airway management in the operating room and interventional suites in known or suspected COVID-19 adult patients: a practical review. Anesth Analg. 2020;131:677–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Luk HN, Yang YL, Huang CH, Su IM, Tsai PB. Application of plastic sheet barrier and video intubating stylet to protect tracheal intubators during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a Taiwan experience. Cell Transplant. 2021;30:963689720987527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. CDC, Coronavirus Disease. Interim US Guidance for risk assessment and public health management of healthcare personnel with potential exposure in a healthcare setting to patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). 2019. Accessed 15 Apr 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chu DK, Akl EA, Duda S, Solo K, Yaacoub S, Schünemann HJ. COVID-19 Systematic Urgent Review Group Effort (SURGE) study authors. Physical distancing, face masks, and eye protection to prevent person-to-person transmission of SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2020;395:1973–87.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ryan AJ, Webster CS, Merry AF, Grieve DJ. A national survey of infection control practice by New Zealand anaesthetists. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2006;34:68–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peng PWH, Ho PL, Hota SS. Outbreak of a new coronavirus: what anaesthetists should know. Br J Anaesth. 2020;124:497–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito T, Asai T. Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: a narrative review. J Anesth. 2020;23:1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Begley JL, Lavery KE, Nickson CP, Brewster DJ. The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1014–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito T, Turumachi N, Okuda Y. The aerosol box for tracheal intubation by a junior operator in patients with COVID-19. Minerva Anestesiol. 2021;87:247–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fidler RL, Niedek CR, Teng JJ, Sturgeon ME, Zhang Q, Robinowitz DL, Hirsch J. Aerosol retention characteristics of barrier devices. Anesthesiology. 2021;134:61–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Au Yong PS, Chen X. Reducing droplet spread during airway manipulation: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic in Singapore. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e176–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Endersby RVW, Ho ECY, Spencer AO, Goldstein DH, Schubert E. Barrier devices for reducing aerosol and droplet transmission in COVID-19 patients: advantages, disadvantages, and alternative solutions. Anesth Analg. 2020;13:e121–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sehulster L, Chinn RY, CDC, HICPAC. Guidelines for environmental infection control in health-care facilities. Recommendations of CDC and the Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee (HICPAC). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2003;52:1–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsui BCH, Deng A, Lin C, Okonski F, Pan S. Droplet evacuation strategy for simulated coughing during aerosol-generating procedures in COVID-19 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e299–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ali MJ. COVID-19 pandemic and lacrimal practice: multipronged resumption strategies and getting back on our feet. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020;68:1292–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang SS, Zhang M, Chong JJR. Comparison of three tracheal intubation methods for reducing droplet spread for use in COVID-19 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2020;125:e190–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ong J, Lee CL, Huang SJ, Shyr MH. Comparison between the Trachway video intubating stylet and Macintosh laryngoscope in four simulated difficult tracheal intubations: a manikin study. CiJi Yi XueZaZhi. 2016;28:109–12.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lin YC, Cho AH, Lin JR, Chung YT. The Clarus Video System (Trachway) and direct laryngoscope for endotracheal intubation with cricoid pressure in simulated rapid sequence induction intubation: a prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2019;19:33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chang PY, Hu PY, Lin YC, Chen HY, Chiang FY, Wu CW, Dionigi G, Lu IC. Trachway video intubating stylet allows for optimization of electromyographic endotracheal tube placement for monitored thyroidectomy. Gland Surg. 2017;6:464–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nørskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, Astrup G, Afshari A, Lundstrøm LH. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists’ prediction of difficult airway management in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:272–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wong P, Lim WY. Aligning difficult airway guidelines with the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines to develop a COVID-19 difficult airway strategy: a narrative review. J Anesth. 2020;34:924–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gupta, B.K., Tripathi, S., Sachan, S., Mhaske, V.R. (2023). Endotracheal Intubation in High-Risk Infections. In: Esquinas, A.M. (eds) Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in High Risk Infections, Mass Casualty and Pandemics . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29673-4_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29673-4_35

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-29672-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-29673-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics