Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Novel Approach to Prognostics and Health Management to Combine Reliability and Process Optimisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advances in Reliability and Maintainability Methods and Engineering Applications

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Reliability Engineering ((RELIABILITY))

  • 425 Accesses

Abstract

Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) supports users with an integrated view of the health of any technical asset, and it consists of many different tasks based on data that are usually obtained from multisensory systems. The effective implementation of PHM does not, however, end with predicting remaining useful life (RUL). PHM has untapped potential to go beyond failure prediction and support of optimal maintenance actions and scheduling, along with logistics decisions. Both data captured by reliability systems and standard production data are generally used separately for different purposes. For higher effectiveness, these data have to be integrated in a combined approach. This can be achieved with the help of Digital Twin analytics that can support effective data use for parallel or combined purposes, such as classifying states, predicting failures or enhancing production efficiency. Furthermore, these seemingly independent concepts can be integrated into the same data collection approach. Previous studies have demonstrated that the afore-mentioned combined solution to classification and prediction challenges is yet only a standard approach to PHM, one that makes it possible to predict RUL, degradation track and optimal time to intervention. Consequently, a new solution is proposed, one that takes into consideration the possibility of intelligent and sustainable production in combination with online predictive maintenance and continuous process optimisation. The prediction of degradation and remaining useful life with the use of multisource data integration facilitates production process optimisation to gain additional use time. This, in turn, brings about incomparably greater financial effects than is the case with the traditional approach to PHM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vališ D, Mazurkiewicz D (2018) Application of selected Levy processes for degradation modelling of long range mine belt using real-time data. Arch Civ Mech Eng 18:1430–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zio E (2009) Reliability engineering: old problems and new challenges. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 94(2):125–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Valis D, Mazurkiewicz D, Forbelska M (2017) Modelling of a transport belt degradation using state space model. In: 2017 IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management (IEEM). IEEE, pp 949–953

    Google Scholar 

  4. Li H, Wang W, Li Z, Dong L, Li Q (2020) A novel approach for predicting tool remaining useful life using limited data. Mech Syst Signal Process 143:106832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Levitt J (2009) The handbook of maintenance management. Industrial Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Holgado M, Macchi M (2014) Exploring the role of E-maintenance for value creation in service provision. In: 2014 international conference on engineering, technology and innovation (ICE). IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rokach L, Maimon O (2014) Data mining with decision trees. World Scientific

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. de Jonge B (2017) Maintenance optimization based on mathematical modeling. University of Groningen, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kosicka E, Kozłowski E, Mazurkiewicz D (2018) Intelligent systems of forecasting the failure of machinery park and supporting fulfilment of orders of spare parts. In: Intelligent systems in production engineering and maintenance–ISPEM 2017: proceedings of the first international conference on intelligent systems in production engineering and maintenance ISPEM 2017 1. Springer International Publishing, pp 54–63

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kozłowski E, Mazurkiewicz D, Żabiński T, Prucnal S, Sęp J (2020) Machining sensor data management for operation-level predictive model. Expert Syst Appl 159:113600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tao F, Anwer N, Liu A, Wang L, Nee AY, Li L, Zhang M (2021) Digital twin towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0. J Manuf Syst 58:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M, Antosz K, Żywica P, Mazurkiewicz D, Sun B, Ren Y (2021) Framework of machine criticality assessment with criteria interactions. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność 23(2):207–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antosz K, Mazurkiewicz D, Kozłowski E, Sęp J, Żabiński T (2022) Machining process time series data analysis with a decision support tool. In: Innovations in mechanical engineering. Springer International Publishing, pp 14–27

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao R, Yan R, Chen Z, Mao K, Wang P, Gao RX (2019) Deep learning and its applications to machine health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Process 115:213–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee J, Wu F, Zhao W, Ghaffari M, Liao L, Siegel D (2014) Prognostics and health management design for rotary machinery systems—reviews, methodology and applications. Mech Syst Signal Process 42(1–2):314–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Koulali MA, Koulali S, Tembine H, Kobbane A (2018) Industrial internet of things-based prognostic health management: a mean-field stochastic game approach. IEEE Access 6:54388–54395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li R, Verhagen WJ, Curran R (2020) A systematic methodology for prognostic and health management system architecture definition. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 193:106598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sutharssan T, Stoyanov S, Bailey C, Yin C (2015) Prognostic and health management for engineering systems: a review of the data-driven approach and algorithms. J Eng 2015(7):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang L, Lin J, Liu B, Zhang Z, Yan X, Wei M (2019) A review on deep learning applications in prognostics and health management. IEEE Access 7:162415–162438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yan J, He Z, He S (2022) A deep learning framework for sensor-equipped machine health indicator construction and remaining useful life prediction. Comput Ind Eng 172:108559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rezaeianjouybari B, Shang Y (2020) Deep learning for prognostics and health management: state of the art, challenges, and opportunities. Measurement 163:107929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sotiris VA, Peter WT, Pecht MG (2010) Anomaly detection through a Bayesian support vector machine. IEEE Trans Reliab 59(2):277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Che C, Wang H, Fu Q, Ni X (2019) Combining multiple deep learning algorithms for prognostic and health management of aircraft. Aerosp Sci Technol 94:105423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fink O, Wang Q, Svensen M, Dersin P, Lee WJ, Ducoffe M (2020) Potential, challenges and future directions for deep learning in prognostics and health management applications. Eng Appl Artif Intell 92:103678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jlassi N, Cédrick B, Khlaief O, Medjaher K (2022) An Approach CPS for the smart monitoring of industrial systems. Omar and Medjaher, Kamal, An Approach CPS for the Smart Monitoring of Industrial Systems (July 26, 2022)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang L, Yang X, Gao J, Huang J, Cui J (2022) Adaptive Gaussian process regression based remaining useful life prediction of PEMFC incorporating an improved health indicator. In: 2022 IEEE 11th data driven control and learning systems conference (DDCLS). IEEE, pp 1080–1085

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gavrilov LA, Gavrilova NS (2005) Reliability theory of aging and longevity. In: Handbook of the biology of aging, pp 3–42

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mazurkiewicz D (2008) Analysis of the ageing impact on the strength of the adhesive sealed joints of conveyor belts. J Mater Process Technol 208(1–3):477–485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Celaya JR, Patil N, Saha S, Wysocki P, Goebel K (2009) Towards accelerated aging methodologies and health management of power MOSFETs (technical brief). In: Annual conference of the PHM Society, vol 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yucesan YA, Dourado A, Viana FA (2021) A survey of modeling for prognosis and health management of industrial equipment. Adv Eng Inform 50:101404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. March ST, Scudder GD (2019) Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations. Inf Syst Front 21:327–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Roemer MJ, Kacprzynski GJ, Orsagh RF (2001) Assessment of data and knowledge fusion strategies for prognostics and health management. In: 2001 IEEE aerospace conference proceedings (Cat. No. 01TH8542), vol 6. IEEE, pp 2979–2988

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sankavaram C, Kodali A, Pattipati K, Wang B, Azam MS, Singh S (2011) A prognostic framework for health management of coupled systems. In: 2011 IEEE conference on prognostics and health management. IEEE, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  34. Merh N (2019) Applying predictive analytics in a continuous process industry. In: Advances in analytics and applications, pp 105–115

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li Q, Ma Z, Li H, Liu X, Guan X, Tian P (2023) Remaining useful life prediction of mechanical system based on performance evaluation and geometric fractional Lévy stable motion with adaptive nonlinear drift. Mech Syst Signal Process 184:109679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tiddens WW, Braaksma AJJ, Tinga T (2018) Selecting suitable candidates for predictive maintenance. Int J Prognostics Health Manage 9(1)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Ye Z, Si S, Yang H, Cai Z, Zhou F (2021) Machine and feedstock interdependence modeling for manufacturing networks performance analysis. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 18(8):5067–5076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang K, Xia T, Wang D, Chen G, Pan E, Xi L (2023) Privacy-preserving and sensor-fused framework for prognostic and health management in leased manufacturing system. Mech Syst Signal Process 184:109666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27(8):861–874

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Jung W, Ismail A (2012) Prognostic and health management trend in automotive industry: an overview. In: Proceedings of conference Korea Society of industrial and systems engineering, pp 35–40

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang J, Ma Y, Zhang L, Gao RX, Wu D (2018) Deep learning for smart manufacturing: methods and applications. J Manuf Syst 48:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tao F, Zhang H, Liu A, Nee AY (2018) Digital twin in industry: state-of-the-art. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 15(4):2405–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Nor AKM, Pedapati SR, Muhammad M, Leiva V (2021) Overview of explainable artificial intelligence for prognostic and health management of industrial assets based on preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Sensors 21(23):8020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Calabrese F, Regattieri A, Bortolini M, Gamberi M, Pilati F (2021) Predictive maintenance: a novel framework for a data-driven, semi-supervised, and partially online prognostic health management application in industries. Appl Sci 11(8):3380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kozłowski E (2015) Analiza i identyfikacja szeregów czasowych. Wydawnictwo Politechniki Lubelskiej, Lublin, Poland

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kozłowski E, Mazurkiewicz D, Sȩp J, Żabiński T (2022) The use of principal component analysis and logistic regression for cutter state identification. In: Innovations in industrial engineering. Springer International Publishing, pp 396–405

    Google Scholar 

  47. Han X, He Y, Wang Z, Cai Y, Dai W (2022) Remaining useful life prediction of manufacturing system based on fuzzy quality state task network. J Manuf Syst 65:233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tao F, Tang Y, Zou X, Qi Q (2019) A field programmable gate array implemented fibre channel switch for big data communication towards smart manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 57:166–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leng J, Liu Q, Ye S, Jing J, Wang Y, Zhang C, Ding Z, Chen X (2020) Digital twin-driven rapid reconfiguration of the automated manufacturing system via an open architecture model. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 63:101895

    Google Scholar 

  50. Bokrantz J, Skoogh A, Berlin C, Stahre J (2017) Maintenance in digitalised manufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030. Int J Prod Econ 191:154–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Xu LD, Xu EL, Li L (2018) Industry 4.0: state of the art and future trends. Int J Prod Res 56(8):2941–2962

    Google Scholar 

  52. Bokrantz J, Skoogh A (2023) Adoption patterns and performance implications of smart maintenance. Int J Prod Econ 256:108746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Van Horenbeek A, Pintelon L (2013) A dynamic predictive maintenance policy for complex multi-component systems. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 120:39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Mazurkiewicz D (2021) Smart maintenance with time series modelling and digital twin

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kritzinger W, Karner M, Traar G, Henjes J, Sihn W (2018) Digital twin in manufacturing: a categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnline 51(11):1016–1022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Barricelli BR, Casiraghi E, Fogli D (2019) A survey on digital twin: definitions, characteristics, applications, and design implications. IEEE Access 7:167653–167671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Qi Q, Tao F (2018) Digital twin and big data towards smart manufacturing and industry 4.0: 360 degree comparison. IEEE Access 6:3585–3593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Lindström J, Larsson H, Jonsson M, Lejon E (2017) Towards intelligent and sustainable production: combining and integrating online predictive maintenance and continuous quality control. Proc CIRP 63:443–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee WJ, Wu H, Yun H, Kim H, Jun MB, Sutherland JW (2019) Predictive maintenance of machine tool systems using artificial intelligence techniques applied to machine condition data. Proc CIRP 80:506–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sun B, Pan J, Wang Z, Ren Y, Mazurkiewicz D, Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M, Antosz K (2021) Fatigue reliability analysis method of reactor structure considering cumulative effect of irradiation. Materials 14(4):801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sun B, Yang X, Ren Y, Wang Z, Antosz K, Loska A, Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M (2021) Failure-based sealing reliability analysis considering dynamic interval and hybrid uncertainties. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność 23(2):278–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Jasiulewicz-Kaczmarek M, Antosz K, Wyczółkowski R, Mazurkiewicz D, Sun B, Qian C, Ren Y (2021) Application of MICMAC, Fuzzy AHP, and Fuzzy TOPSIS for evaluation of the maintenance factors affecting sustainable manufacturing. Energies 14(5):1436

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the individual research grant FD-20/IM-5/072/2022, of the scientific discipline Mechanical Engineering, Lublin University of Technology, Poland. This work was prepared within the project PM/SP/0063/2021/1 titled “Innovative measurement technologies supported by digital data processing algorithms for improved processes and products”, financed by the Ministry of Education and Science (Poland) as a part of the Polish Metrology Programme. This work was partially prepared under the project “Digital Twin Based Fault Prediction and Maintenance Method for Intelligent Instruments”—Grant No. G2021177009L under the framework of the “High-end International Visiting Professor Project” through long distance collaboration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Lublin University of Technology, Nadbystrzycka 36, 20-618, Lublin, Poland

    Dariusz Mazurkiewicz

  2. School of Reliability and Systems Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, 100191, China

    Yi Ren & Cheng Qian

Authors
  1. Dariusz Mazurkiewicz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Ren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cheng Qian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dariusz Mazurkiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Center for System Reliability and Safety, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

    Yu Liu

  2. Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Dong Wang

  3. Center for System Reliability and Safety, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan, China

    Jinhua Mi

  4. Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

    He Li

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mazurkiewicz, D., Ren, Y., Qian, C. (2023). Novel Approach to Prognostics and Health Management to Combine Reliability and Process Optimisation. In: Liu, Y., Wang, D., Mi, J., Li, H. (eds) Advances in Reliability and Maintainability Methods and Engineering Applications. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28859-3_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28859-3_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-28858-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-28859-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation