Abstract
The chapter opens up key dichotomies characterizing the Western cartesian worldview and modernity to shed light on the consequences of an understanding of the world characterized by binaries and to open up the doors towards a new space of flourishing. We understand decolonization efforts in economic thinking and science as attempts to destabilize this binary world organization and to create a new space of possibilities, enabled by a worldview where power relations are distributed anew. We beginn by identifying and questioning the divides between who is central and who is peripheral, who is developed and who is developing, who is studying and who is being studied, how knowledge is created and accepted, who is controlling and who/what is being controlled. At the same time, we identify concepts lived among some communities that transcend these dichotomies, growing some early branches and roots cracking the colonial and modern Western edifice of thought and values. These include real existing practices such as Buen Vivir, life-centered development, self-governance in Yugoslavia (as endogenous knowledge), reciprocal relations with the non-human world, co-creation with nature, maintenance of the life-basis and reproduction of life, beauty, gender mainstreaming, positionality in science. These ideas and their practice help us redefine our models of thought and analysis, and contribute to the making of a worldview where our identity as humans may become newly defined.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anthony-Stevens V, Matsaw SL Jr (2020) The productive uncertainty of indigenous and decolonizing methodologies in the preparation of interdisciplinary STEM researchers. Cult Stud Sci Educ 15(2):595–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09942-x
Basile S, Asselin H, Martin T (2018) Co-construction of a data collection tool: a case study with atikamekw women 17(3):840–860. https://acme-journal.org/index.php/acme/article/view/1414.
Capra F (1984) The turning point: science, society, and the rising culture. Bantam Books, New York
Castro CJ (2004) Sustainable development: mainstream and critical perspectives. Organ Environ 17(2):195–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604264910
Chan H (2007) Bad samaritans. the myth of free trade the secret history of capitalism. London, Bloomsbury Press
D’Alisa G, Demaria F, Kallis G (2020) Degrowth: słownik nowej ery. LangeL, Łódź
D’Alisa G (2019) The state of degrowth. In: Chertkovskaya E, Paulsson A, Barca S (eds) Towards a political economy of degrowth. Illustrated edition. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, London, pp 243–57
Demuth B (2019) Floating coast: an environmental history of the bering strait. W.W. Norton, New York, p 416
Domptail SE, Nuppenau EA (2018) Push and pull relations between villages and cities from a rural perspective. Rural 21 Int J Rural Develop 52(4)
Dragićević Šešić M (2018) Culture and democracy: cultural policies at work; Is cultural policy theory possible at the semi-periphery (Kultura i demokratija—kulturne politike na delu—da li jemoguća teorija kulturne politike na poluperiferiji?), journal Kultura, 2018, n. 160, pp 13–35, link to English version, https://www.casopiskultura.rs/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/prevodi/6.%20Milena%20Dragicevic%20Sesic,%20CULTURE%20AND%20DEMOCRACY,%20Culture%20No.%20160,%202018.pdf
Escobar A (1992) Imagining a post-development era? critical thought development and social movements. Soc Text 31(32):20. https://doi.org/10.2307/466217
Escobar A (1995) Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton Studies in Culture/Power/History. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Ezeanya-Esiobu C (2019) Indigenous knowledge and education in Africa: Springer Open (Frontiers in African Business Research)
Fricker M (2007) Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press
Haraway D (1988) Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud 14(3):575–599
Hawkes (2004) The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network: Common Ground, Melbourne
Hickel J, Kallis G (2019) Is green growth possible? New Polit Econ:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
Holt-Giménez E, Altieri MA (2013) Agroecology, food sovereignty, and the new green revolution. Agroecol Sustain Food Syst 37(1):90–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10440046.2012.716388
Jackson T, Victor PR (2020) The transition to a sustainable prosperity-a stock-flow-consistent ecological macroeconomic model for Canada. Ecol Econ 177(November):106787. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106787
Janvid M (2021): Testimony in African epistemology revisited. S Afr J Philos 40(3):279–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/02580136.2021.1954766
Kothari A, Salleh A, Escobar A, Demaria F, Acosta A (2019) Pluriverse: a post-development dictionary. https://www.academia.edu/39692614/_Pluriverse_A_Post_Development_Dictionary_AUF_2019_NEW_BOOK_edited_by_Ashish_Kothari_Ariel_Salleh_Arturo_Escobar_Federico_Demaria_and_Alberto_Acosta_Download_full_ebook_for_free_PDF_License_Creative_Commons.
Latouche S (2015) Decolonization of imaginary. In: D’Alisa G, Demaria F, Kallis G (eds) Degrowth: a vocabulary for a new era. Abingdon, Routledge, 117–120
Martinez-Alier J (2002) The environmentalism of the poor. In: a study of ecological conflicts and valuation, pp 312. Edward Edgar Publishers. ISBN: 9781840649093. eISBN: 9781843765486. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781843765486
Martinez-Alier J, Anguelovski I, Bond P, Del Bene D, Demaria F, Gerber JF, Greyl L et al (2014) Between activism and science: grassroots concepts for sustainability coined by environmental justice organizations. J Polit Ecol 21(1) https://doi.org/10.2458/v21i1.21124.
Mbembe A (2015) Decolonising knowledge and the question of the archive. Basis for public lectures held in South Africa. Published by the University of Witwatersrand, South Africa under https://wiser.wits.ac.za/system/files/Achille%20Mbembe%20-%20Decolonizing%20Knowledge%20and%20the%20Question%20of%20the%20Archive.pdf. Accessed last on 2 Feb 2023
Merchant C (2006) The scientific revolution and the death of nature. Isis 97:513–533
Merchant C (2020) The death of nature: women, ecology, and the scientific revolution. HarperOne; Reprint Edition (10. Januar 1990)
Mies M, Shiva V (1993, 2014) Ecofeminism. Zed Books (Critique Influence Change), London, New York
Mignolo WD, Walsh CE (2018) On decoloniality: concepts analytics praxis. Duke University Press, Durham/London
Mohanty CT (1988) Under western eyes: feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. Fem Rev 30:61–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/1395054
Moore JW (2015) Capitalism in the Web of Life: ecology and the accumulation of capital. London/New York: Verso
Nagel T (1974) What is it like to be a bat? Philos Rev 83(4):435–450
Polanyi M (1983) The tacit dimension. Gloucester, MASS. Library of congress, Catalog card number 66-21015. First published in 1966. ISBN: 0-8446-5999-1
Richter K (2022) Provincialising degrowth and situating buen vivir: a decolonial framework for the politics of degrowth (Doctoral Dissertation). Goldsmiths, London
Sanford AW (2011) Ethics, narrative, and agriculture: transforming agricultural practice through ecological imagination. J Agric Environ Ethics 24(3):283–303
Scott D (1995) Revolution/theory/modernity notes on the cognitive-political crisis of our time. social and economic studies 44(2/3):1–23. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27866025
Sum NL, Jessop B (2013) Towards a cultural political economy. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9780857930712
Wood DA (2020) Epistemic decolonization: a critical investigation into the anticolonial politics of knowledge. Springer Nature
Acknowledgements
We express our special gratitude to all authors of this book, who contributed to this chapter by highlighting their key results and conclusions. The chapter has greatly benefited from reviews and supporting comments from Martin Petrick, Milena Dragićević Šešić, and Katharina Richter. Stéphanie Eileen Domptail’s work with Jennifer Hirsch, Jessica Mörsdorf and Sergej Enns also inspired this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Domptail, S.E., De Santo, M.K. (2023). Beyond Western Dichotomies of Power: Life-Centered Development, Reciprocity and Co-creation Within Nature. In: De Santo, M.K., Domptail, S.E. (eds) Degrowth Decolonization and Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25945-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25945-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-25944-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-25945-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)