Skip to main content

The New EU-Africa Relations’ Strategy: Soft Power or Neoliberalist Power?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics Between Nations

Part of the book series: Contributions to International Relations ((CIR))

Abstract

During the last two decades, the European Union has tried to emerge as a global political player without following the realist Great Powers’ pattern: its discursive identity has been the one of a democratic and multicultural union of states that promote universal values. Sub-Saharan African states provide the true litmus test for the EU’s identity projection, given the colonial past and the postcolonial legacy of most Western European countries.

In this chapter, we will examine the EU’s efforts to refine its strategy as a different global actor in relation to states of sub-Saharan Africa. We will detail what the new EU-Africa Strategy entails and comment on its merits and shortcomings in distinct, theoretical, thematic parts.

In another, empirical part, we will assess the validity of the nascent strategy and how it is perceived by relevant national stakeholders in the region, through a series of semi-directed interviews.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    European Parliament, EPRS (2021).

  2. 2.

    European Commission (2020).

  3. 3.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  4. 4.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  5. 5.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  6. 6.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  7. 7.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  8. 8.

    European Commission (2020), p. 1.

  9. 9.

    European Commission (2020), pp. 1–2.

  10. 10.

    European Commission (2020), p. 16.

  11. 11.

    European Parliament (2021), para. 4.

  12. 12.

    European Parliament (2021), para. 4.

  13. 13.

    Amare and Melly (2017).

  14. 14.

    European Parliament (2021).

  15. 15.

    Mabera (2020).

  16. 16.

    European Parliament (2021), para. 4.

  17. 17.

    European Parliament (2021), para. 12.

  18. 18.

    Petrica (2020), p. 602.

  19. 19.

    Jișa et al. (2021).

  20. 20.

    European Commission (2020), p. 9.

  21. 21.

    European Commission (2020), p. 9.

  22. 22.

    European Commission (2020), p. 2.

  23. 23.

    European Commission (2020), p. 2.

  24. 24.

    China has sent 700 peacekeeping troops in the UN Mission in South Sudan (UNMISS) in 2015, it has a logistics base in Djibouti and is currently the second largest financial contributor to UN peacekeeping.

  25. 25.

    Nyabiage (2020).

  26. 26.

    Pirozzi and Godsäter (2015), p. 26.

  27. 27.

    Faleg and Palleschi (2020), pp. 74–76.

  28. 28.

    Select Committee on International Relations and Defence, House of Lords (2020), p. 6.

  29. 29.

    Mișcoiu (2018b), pp. 19–30.

  30. 30.

    For a detailed account, see Otieno Onyalo (2020), pp. 9–17. Mişcoiu and Kakdeu (2021).

  31. 31.

    European Commission (2020), p. 7.

  32. 32.

    De Waele and Kuipers (2013).

  33. 33.

    Wallerstein (1974), pp. 387–415.

  34. 34.

    Mișcoiu (2018a), pp. 345–348.

  35. 35.

    Pessot et al. (2021).

  36. 36.

    Skolimowska (2015), pp. 111–131.

  37. 37.

    Hyde-Price (2008), pp. 29–44.

  38. 38.

    European Commission (2020), p. 13.

  39. 39.

    European Parliament (2021), para. 11.

  40. 40.

    European Commission (2020), p. 17.

  41. 41.

    Faleg and Palleschi (2020), pp. 11–13.

  42. 42.

    Faleg and Palleschi (2020), pp. 78–79.

  43. 43.

    Creswell (2014).

  44. 44.

    Mișcoiu et al. (2015), pp. 7–19.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mișcoiu, S., Petrica, D. (2023). The New EU-Africa Relations’ Strategy: Soft Power or Neoliberalist Power?. In: Akande, A. (eds) Politics Between Nations. Contributions to International Relations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24896-2_26

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics