Skip to main content

Invasive Adenocarcinoma Versus Adenocarcinoma In Situ

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Lung Pathology

Part of the book series: Practical Anatomic Pathology ((PAP))

  • 658 Accesses

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer death worldwide, of which adenocarcinomas are the most common histologic subtype. On computed tomography, lung adenocarcinoma may show both solid and ground-glass components. The solid component often corresponds to invasive growth, while the ground-glass component corresponds to lepidic or in situ growth. Differentiating between lepidic-predominant invasive adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in situ can pose a diagnostic challenge. Invasion is defined as any histologic pattern other than lepidic, such as acinar, papillary, micropapillary, or solid; however, distinguishing some of these patterns from lepidic growth may be difficult and somewhat subjective. Aside from histologic pattern, invasion may also be defined by extension into the lymphatics, blood vessels, and/or visceral pleura. Accurate diagnosis of invasive versus in situ lesions is important, as invasive disease may necessitate more aggressive management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lozano R, Naghavi M, Foreman K, et al. Global and regional mortality from 235 causes of death for 20 age groups in 1990 and 2010: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380:2095–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Zappa C, Mousa SA. Non-small cell lung cancer: current treatment and future advances. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2016;5(3):288–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Burke AP, Marx A, Nicholson AG, editors. WHO classification of Tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Geneva: WHO Press; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Borczuk AC. Assessment of invasion in lung adenocarcinoma classification, including adenocarcinoma in situ and minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:S1–S10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Suzuki K, Asamura H, Kusumoto M, et al. ‘Early’ peripheral lung cancer: prognostic significance of ground glass opacity on thin-section computed tomographic scan. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74:1635–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Noduchi M, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:244–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakamura S, Fukui T, Taniguchi T, et al. Prognostic impact of tumor size eliminating the ground glass opacity component: modified clinical T descriptors of the tumor, node, metastasis classification of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:1551–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Russell PA, Barnett SA, Walkiewicz M, et al. Correlation of mutation status and survival with predominant histologic subtype according to the new IASLC/ATS/ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification in stage III (N2) patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:461–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Russell PA, Wainer Z, Wright GM, et al. Does lung adenocarcinoma subtype predict patient survival? A clinicopathologic study based on the new International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer/American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary lung adenocarcinoma classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;9:1496–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadota K, Yeh Y, Sima C, et al. The cribriform pattern identifies a subset of acinar predominant tumors with poor prognosis in patients with stage I lung adenocarcinoma: a conceptual proposal to classify cribriform predominant tumors as a distinct histologic subtype. Mod Pathol. 2014;27(5):690–700. https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2013.188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kamiya K, Hayashi Y, Douguchi K, et al. Histopathological features and prognostic significance of the micropapillary pattern in lung adenocarcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2008;8:992–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshizawa A, Motoi N, Riely GJ, et al. Impact of proposed IASLC/ATS/ERS classification of lung adenocarcinoma: prognostic subgroups and implications for further revision of staging based on analysis of 514 stage I cases. Mod Pathol. 2011;24:653–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stenhouse G, Fyfe N, King G, et al. Thyroid transcription factor 1 in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. J Clin Pathol. 2004;57:383–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindeman NI, Cagle PT, Beasley MB, et al. Molecular testing guideline for selection of lung cancer patients for EGFR and ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors: guideline from the College of American Pathologists, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Association for Molecular Pathology. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(7):823–59.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Paez JG, Janne PA, Lee JC, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science. 2004;5676:1497–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pao W, Miller V, Zakowski M, et al. EGF receptor gene mutations are common in lung cancers from ‘never smokers’ and are associated with sensitivity of tumors to gefitinib and erlotinib. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:13306–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Thunnissen E, Beasley MB, Borczuk AC, et al. Reproducibility of histopathological subtypes and invasion in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. An international interobserver study. Mod Pathol. 2012;25:1574–83.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Maeyashiki T, Suzuki K, Hattori A, et al. The size of consolidation on thin-section computed tomography is a better predictor of survival than the maximum tumour dimension in resectable lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(5):915–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsutani Y, Miyata Y, Nakayama H, et al. Prognostic significance of using solid versus whole tumor size on high-resolution computed tomography for predicting pathologic malignant grade tumors in clinical stage IA lung adenocarcinoma: a multicenter study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;143(3):607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amin MB, Edge SB, Greene FL, et al., editors. AJCC cancer staging manual. 8th ed. New York, NY: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Jones KD. Whence Lepidic?: the history of a Canadian neologism. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2013;12:1822–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chung J, Chloe G, Jheon S, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and pathologic-radiologic correlation between multiple lung nodules with ground-glass opacity differentiates multicentric origin from intrapulmonary spread. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:1490–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Detterbeck FC, Marom EM, Arenberg DA, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: background data and proposals for the application of TNM staging rules to lung cancer presenting as multiple nodules with ground glass or lepidic features or a pneumonic type of involvement in the forthcoming eighth edition of the TNM classification. J Thorac Oncol. 2015;11(5):666–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Takamochi K, Oh S, Matsuoka J, Suzuki K. Clonality status of multifocal lung adenocarcinomas based on the mutation patterns of EGFR and K-ras. Lung Cancer. 2012;75:313–720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory A. Fishbein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liou, S., Fishbein, G.A. (2022). Invasive Adenocarcinoma Versus Adenocarcinoma In Situ. In: Xu, H., Ricciotti, R.W., Mantilla, J.G. (eds) Practical Lung Pathology. Practical Anatomic Pathology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14402-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14402-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14401-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14402-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics