Skip to main content

Malignancies: Collections Drainage, Biopsies, and Endovascular Bail-Out Treatments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Gynecological and Obstetric Diseases

Abstract

The management of advanced gynecological malignancies is now in the domain of a multidisciplinary evaluation where Interventional Radiology (IR) occupies a prominent role.

IR utilizes minimally invasive advanced image-guided percutaneous techniques in gynecologic treatment, including biopsies, fluid aspiration, drainage catheter placement, and pelvic arterial embolization.

Patients with refractory malignant ascites, pleural effusion, postoperative fluid collections (abscess, seroma, or lymphocele), or with urinary and biliary tracts infiltrations may benefit from percutaneous aspiration of fluid collections or placement of drainage catheters; those with uncontrolled postoperative or oncological advanced mass bleeding can be effectively managed with transpelvic arterial embolization, both in the acute and chronic setting.

Regarding hemorrhagic complications, these may occur in the tumor itself due to cancer tissue erosion and vessels infiltration or may be related to iatrogenic vascular lesions consequent to surgery, mini-invasive procedures, and chemo-radiotherapy; embolization represents a bail-out treatment in both acute and chronic scenarios.

The purpose of this chapter is to review IR procedures in patients affected by gynecological malignancies in advanced stages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chow DS, Itagaki MW. Interventional oncology research in the United States: slowing growth, limited focus, and a low level of funding. Radiology. 2010;257:410–7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10100070.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mahnken AH, Bruners P, GĂ¼nther RW. Techniques of interventional tumor therapy. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2008;105:646–53. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2008.0646.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cannistra SA. Cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(24):2519–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H III, et al. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000;70(2):209–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morgan RJ Jr, Copeland L, Gershenson D, et al. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN ovarian cancer practice guidelines. Oncology (Williston Park). 1996;10(11, Suppl):293–310.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. NNA H, Krapcho M, Garshell J, et al., editors. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2010. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2013. Based on November 2012 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER Website: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2010/.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol. 1999;189(1):12–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheurer ME, Tortolero-Luna G, Adler-Storthz K. Human papillomavirus infection: biology, epidemiology, and prevention. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2005;15(5):727–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Corr BR, Behbakht K, Spillman MA. Gynecologic biopsy for molecular profiling: a review for the interventional radiologist. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2013;30(4):417–24. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0033-1359738.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Neill SB, O’Connor OJ, Ryan MF, et al. Interventional radiology and the care of the oncology patient. Radiol Res Pract. 2011;2011:160867. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/160867.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Revel-Mouroz P, Mokrane FZ, Collot S, et al. Hemostatic embolization in oncology. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96:807–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.06.008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yu H, Stavas JM. The role of interventional radiology in the management of benign and malignant gynecologic diseases. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2013;68:691–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182a878c6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Singh H. Interventional radiology in the gynecological oncology patient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15:279–90. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahnken AH, Bruners P. GĂ¼nther RW: techniques of interventional tumor therapy. Deutsches Arzteblatt. 2008;105(38):646–53.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu H, Stavas JM. The role of interventional radiology in the management of benign and malignant gynecologic diseases. Obstet Gynecol Surv Oct. 2013;68(10):691–701. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e3182a878c6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stokes LS. Percutaneous management of malignant fluid collections. Semin Interv Radiol. 2007;24:398–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Singh H. Interventional radiology in the gynaecological oncology patient. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;15(2):279–90. https://doi.org/10.1053/beog.2000.0168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fagotti A, Costantini B, Fanfani F, et al. Risk of postoperative pelvic abscess in major gynecologic oncology surgery: one-year single-institution experience. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17:2452–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ayantunde AA, Parsons SL. Pattern and prognostic factors in patients with malignant ascites: a retrospective study. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:945–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee CW, Bociek G, Faught W. A survey of practice in the management of malignant ascites. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1998;16:96–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Runyon BA. Care of patients with ascites. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:337–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Parsons SL, Watson SA, Steele RJ. Malignant ascites. Br J Surg. 1996;83:6–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mahrer A, Ramchandani P, Trerotola SO, et al. Sclerotherapy in the management of postoperative lymphocele. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:1050–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Todokoro T, Furniss D, Oda K, et al. Effective treatment of pelvic lymphocele by lymphaticovenular anastomosis. Gynecol Oncol. 2013;128:209–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Campbell JJ, Gervais DA. Percutaneous drainage of abscesses in the abdomen and pelvis. In: Mauro MA, KPJ M, Thomson KR, et al., editors. Image-guided interventions. Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier; 2008. p. 1321–32.

    Google Scholar 

  27. O’Connor OJ, Buckley JM, Maher MM. Interventional radiology in oncology. Cancer Treat Res. 2008;143:493–511.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Uzbek MH, Almeida FA, Sarkis MG, et al. Management of malignant pleural Effusions. Adv Ther. 2010;27(6):334–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Seaton KG, Patz EF, Goodman PC. Palliative treatment of malignant pleural effusions: value of smallbore catheter thoracostomy and doxycycline sclerotherapy. Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164(3):589–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lombardi G, Zustovich F, Nicoletto MO, Donach M, Artioli G, Pastorelli D. Diagnosis and treatment of malignant pleural effusion: a systematic literature review and new approaches. Am J Clin Oncol. 2010;33(4):420–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mironov O, Ishill NM, Mironov S, et al. Pleural effusion detected at CT prior to primary cytoreduction for stage III or IV ovarian carcinoma: effect on survival. Radiology. 2011;258:776–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Pollak JS, Burdge CM, Rosenblatt M, et al. Treatment of malignant pleural effusions with tunneled long-term drainage catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;12:201–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pollak JS. Malignant pleural effusions: treatment with tunneled long-term drainage catheters. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2002;8:302–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Whitworth JM, Schneider KE, Fauci JM, et al. Outcomes of patients with gynecologic malignancies undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;125:646–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Russo P. Urologic emergencies in the cancer patient. Semin Oncol. 2000;27(3):284–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Park BK, Kim SH, Moon MH. Nonvascular interventions of the urinary tract. J Korean Med Sci. 2002;17(6):727–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Kim SH, Park JH, Han MC. Antegrade balloon dilatation and ureteral stenting for the benign ureteral strictures. J Korean Radiol Soc. 1994;30:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. McAleer SJ, Loughlin KR. Nephrolithiasis and pregnancy. Curr Opin Urol. 2004;14(2):123–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Dyer RB, Regan JD, Kavanagh PV, Khatod EG, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ. Percutaneous nephrostomy with extensions of the technique: step by step. Radiographics. 2002;22(3):503–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kalogeropoulou C, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN. Imaging in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2009;23(10):1571–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wong LM, Cleeve LK, Milner AD, Pitman AG. Malignant ureteral obstruction: outcomes after intervention. Have things changed? J Urol. 2007;178(1):178–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Harrington KJ, Pandha HS, Kelly SA, et al. Palliation of obstructive nephropathy due to malignancy. Br J Urol. 1995;76:101–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Fallon B, Olney L, Culp DA. Nephrostomy in cancer patients: to do or not to do? Br J Urol. 1980;52:237–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Shekarriz B, Shekarriz H, Upadhyay J, et al. Outcome of palliative urinary diversion in the treatment of advanced malignancies. Cancer. 1999;85:998–1003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rossi P, Bezzi M, Rossi M, et al. Metallic stents in malignant biliary obstruction: results of a multicenter European study of 240 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1994;5(2):279–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Becker CD, Glättli A, Maibach R, Baer HU. Percutaneous palliation of malignant obstructive jaundice with the Wallstent endoprosthesis: follow-up and reintervention in patients with hilar and non-hilar obstruction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1993;4(5):597–604.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Carrasco CH, Zornoza J, Bechtel WJ. Malignant biliary obstruction: complications of percutaneous biliary drainage. Radiology. 1984;152(2):343–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Nomura T, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Bacteribilia and cholangitis after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage for malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Dis Sci. 1999;44(3):542–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nichols DA, MacCarty R, Gaffey TA. Cholangiographic evaluation of bile duct carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol. 1983;141(6):1291–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. O’Neill MJ, Rafferty EA, Lee SI, et al. Transvaginal interventional procedures: aspiration, biopsy, and catheter drainage. Radiographics. 2001;21(3):657–72. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.21.3.g01ma20657.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Weston M, Soyer P, Barral M, et al. Role of interventional procedures in obstetrics and gynecology. Radiol Clin N Am. 2020;58(2):445–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2019.11.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gupta S, Wallace MJ, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous needle biopsy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(7):969–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Thabet A, Somarouthu B, Oliva E, et al. Image-guided ovarian mass biopsy: efficacy and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(12):1922–1927.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2014.08.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Varadhachary GR, Abbruzzese JL, Lenzi R. Diagnostic strategies for unknown primary cancer. Cancer. 2004;100(9):1776–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Spencer JA, Swift SE, Wilkinson N, et al. Peritoneal carcinomatosis: image-guided peritoneal core biopsy for tumor type and patient care. Radiology. 2001;221(1):173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Zikan M, Fischerova D, Pinkavova I, et al. Ultrasound-guided true-cut biopsy of abdominal and pelvic tumors in gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2010;36(6):767–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8803.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Griffin N, Grant LA, Freeman SJ, et al. Image-guided biopsy in patients with suspected ovarian carcinoma: a safe and effective technique? Eur Radiol. 2009;19:230–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kobal B, Noventa M, Cvjeticanin B, et al. Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced-stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals. Radiol Oncol. 2018;52(3):307–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Van der Burg ME, van Lent M, Buyse M, et al. The effect of debulking surgery after induction chemotherapy on the prognosis in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: gynecological cancer cooperative Group of the European Organization for research and treatment of cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:629–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Rose PG, Nerenstone S, Brady MF, et al. Secondary surgical cytoreduction for advanced ovarian carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2489–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Hewitt M, Anderson K, Hall G, et al. Women with peritoneal carcinomatosis of unknown origin: efficacy of image-guided biopsy to determine site-specific diagnosis. BLOG. 2006;114(1):46–50.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Prat A, Perou CM. Deconstructing the molecular portraits of breast cancer. Mol Oncol. 2011;5(1):5–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Walkey MM, Freidman AC, Sohotra AC, et al. CT manifestations of peritoneal carcinomatosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150:1035–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Malmstrom H. Fine-needle aspiration cytology versus core biopsies in the evaluation of recurrent gynecologic malignancies. Gynecol Oncol. 1997;65:69–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Karoo RO, Lloyd TD, Garcea G, et al. How valuable is ascitic cytology in the detection and management of malignancy? Postgrad Med J. 2003;79:292–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Oge T, Yalcin OT, Ozalp SS, et al. Sonographically guided core biopsy: a minimally invasive procedure for managing adnexal masses. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(11):2023–7. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.32.11.2023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Yarram SG, Nghiem HV, Higgins E, et al. Evaluation of imaging-guided core biopsy of pelvic masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188(5):1208–11. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.05.1393.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Arellano RS, Maher M, Gervais DA, et al. The difficult biopsy: let’s make it easier. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2003;32(5):218–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Chojniak R, Isberner RK, Viana LM, et al. Computed tomography-guided needle biopsy: experience from 1,300 procedures. Sao Paulo Med J. 2006;124:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Bdour M, Hourani S, Mefleh W, et al. Comparison between fine-needle aspiration cytology and true-cut biopsy in the diagnosis of breast cancer. J Surg Pak (Int). 2008;13:19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Charboneau JW, Reading CC, Welch TJ. CT and sonographically guided needle biopsy: current techniques and new innovations. AJR. 1990;154:1–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Scanlan KA, Propeck PA, Lee FT Jr. Invasive procedures in the female pelvis: the value of transabdominal, endovaginal, and endorectal US guidance. Radiographics. 2001;21:491–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Dodd GD III, Esola CC, Memel DS, et al. Sonography: the undiscovered jewel of interventional radiology. Radiographics. 1996;16:1271–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Memel DS, Dodd GD III, Esola CC. Efficacy of sonography as a guidance technique for biopsy of abdominal, pelvic, and retroperitoneal lymph nodes. AJR. 1996;167:957–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Bret PM, Guibaud L, Atri M, et al. Transvaginal US-guided aspiration of ovarian cysts and pelvic masses. Radiology. 1992;185:377–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gupta S, Nguyen HL, Morello FA Jr, et al. Various approaches for CT- guided percutaneous biopsy of deep pelvic lesions: anatomic and technical considerations. Radiographics. 2004;24:175–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Gupta S, Madoff DC, Ahrar K, et al. CT-guided needle biopsy of deep pelvic lesions by extraperitoneal approach through iliopsoas muscle. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003;26(6):534–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-003-0035-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Havrilesky LJ, Krivak TC, Mucenski JW, et al. Impact of a chemoresponse assay on treatment costs for recurrent ovarian cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(2):e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Bree RL, Goldstein HM, Wallace S. Transcatheter embolization of the internal iliac artery in the management of neoplasms of the pelvis. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:597–601.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Grace DM, Pitt DF, Gold RE. Vascular embolization and occlusion by angiographic techniques as an aid or alternative to operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1976;143:469–82.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Hendrickx P, Orth G, Grunert J. Embolisation of pelvic bleeding lesions from benign origin—long-term results. J Belg Radiol. 1995;78:339–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Hutchins FL Jr, Worthington-Kirsch R. Embolotherapy for myoma-induced menorrhagia. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2000;27:397. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8545(00)80030-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Baakdah H, Tulandi T. Uterine fibroid embolization. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48:361–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.grf.0000159542.19598.ea.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Li X, Wang Z, Chen J, et al. Uterine artery embolization for the management of secondary postpartum haemorrhage associated with placenta accreta. Clin Radiol. 2012;67:e71–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2012.07.021.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Hori A. Complications following transcatheter arterial embolization for haemorrhage associated with pelvic fracture. Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi. 1991;51:365–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Mihmanli I, Cantasdemir M, Kantarci F, et al. Percutaneous embolization in the management of intractable vaginal bleeding. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001;264:211–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004040000119.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Tinelli A, Prudenzano R, Malvasi A, et al. Emergency endovascular nanopharmacologic treatment in advanced gynecological cancers. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:1250–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e4a68d.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Albu S, Grigoriu C, Vasiliu C, et al. The role of uterine artery embolization in cervical cancer—single case report. Medica (Buchar). 2011;6:137–40.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Cabrera R, Nelson DR. Review article: the management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:461–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04200.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Amesur NB, Zajko AB, Carr BI. Chemo-embolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with different sizes of embolization particles. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1400–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-007-9995-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Rodríguez Carvajal R, Orgaz A, Leal JI, et al. Renal embolization and nephrectomy in a single surgical act in high-risk renal tumor pathology. Ann Vasc Surg. 2011;25:222–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Spinosa DJ, Angle JF, McGraw JK, et al. Transcatheter treatment of life-threatening lower gastrointestinal bleeding due to advanced pelvic malignancy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 1998;21:503–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002709900312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Matsumoto AH, Selby JB Jr, Tegtmeyer CJ. Detachable balloons as peripheral vascular embolic agents. Semin Intervent Radiol. 1992;9:62–71. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1074671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Marin ML, Veith FJ, Panetta TF, et al. Percutaneous transfemoral insertion of a stented graft to repair a traumatic femoral arteriovenous fistula. J Vasc Surg. 1993;18:299–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Piazza F, Corvino F, Silvestre M, et al. Role of interventional radiology in obstetric and gynecological diseases. J Radiol Rev. 2020;7:26–38. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2283-8376.20.00253-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Corvino F, Giurazza F, Cangiano G, et al. Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular blowout syndrome in end-stage malignancies. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:382.e1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.051.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Coppola M, Giurazza F, Corvino F, et al. Severe metrorrhagia in patients with advanced gynecologic cancer: endovascular treatment benefits in acute and chronic setting. Radiol Med. 2021;126(2):277–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-020-01251-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Patanè D, Coniglio G, Bonomo S, Camerano F, Arcerito F, Calcara G, Bisceglie P, Malfa P. Gynecological malignancies: bail-out interventional radiology treatments. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2021;42(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2020.09.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patanè, D. et al. (2023). Malignancies: Collections Drainage, Biopsies, and Endovascular Bail-Out Treatments. In: Niola, R., Pinto, A., Giurazza, F. (eds) Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology in Gynecological and Obstetric Diseases. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11910-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11910-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-11909-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-11910-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics