Skip to main content

The First Tests of the SGEI Framework in the Postal Sector: Takeaways from the Judgements in the Česká pošta and Post Danmark Cases

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Postal and Delivery Contribution in Hard Times

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy ((TREP))

  • 140 Accesses

Abstract

The General Court issued its first two judgements on the application of the SGEI Framework in the postal sector in the Ceská Pošta and Post Danmark cases. This article reviews both the legal assessment and the economic analysis of the Court in the two judgments and looks at the implications for State aid assessment of USO (and/or other postal SGEIs) financing in the future.

The information and views set out in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    General Court, judgment of 15 October 2020, case T-316/18, První novinová společnost v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2020:489.

  2. 2.

    C(2018) 753 final of 19 February 2018, State aid SA.45281 and State aid SA.44859.

  3. 3.

    See §25 SGEI Framework, “Under the net avoided cost methodology, the net cost necessary, or expected to be necessary, to discharge the public service obligations is calculated as the difference between the net cost for the provider of operating with the public service obligation and the net cost or profit for the same provider of operating without that obligation”.

  4. 4.

    C(2018) 3169 final of 28 May 2018, SA.47707 (2018/N).

  5. 5.

    General Court, judgment of 5 May 2021, case T-561/18, ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission, ECLI:EU:T:2021:240.

  6. 6.

    Case T-316/18, p. 106.

  7. 7.

    Ibidem, p. 60.

  8. 8.

    The procedure had in fact involved a first notification (30 July 2015) of the proposed aid, that was then withdrawn by the Czech authorities on 29 April 2016; a subsequent first pre-notification on 29 April 2016, a second pre-notification on 28 July 2017 and a (final) notification on 18 December 2017.

  9. 9.

    Case T-316/18, p. 120.

  10. 10.

    Ibidem, p. 141.

  11. 11.

    Case T-561/18, p. 63.

  12. 12.

    General Court, judgment of 28 March 2012, Ryanair v Commission, case T-123/09, EU:T:2012:164, p. 168.

  13. 13.

    General Court, judgment of 15 November 2018, T-793/14, Tempus Energy, EU:T:2018:790.

  14. 14.

    Case T-561/18, p. 75.

  15. 15.

    See General Court, judgment of 9 October 2018, case T-884/16, Multiconnect v Commission, EU:T:2018:665, p. 37.

  16. 16.

    Case T-316/18, p. 327.

  17. 17.

    Case T-561/18, p. 164.

  18. 18.

    Article 106(2): “Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest (…) shall be subject to the rules contained in the Treaties, in particular to the rules on competition, in so far as the application of such rules does not obstruct the performance, in law or in fact, of the particular tasks assigned to them. The development of trade must not be affected to such an extent as would be contrary to the interests of the Union”.

  19. 19.

    Ibidem, p. 165.

  20. 20.

    Case T-125/12, Viasat Broadcasting UK v Commission, EU:T:2015:687, pp. 87–88.

  21. 21.

    Case T-561/18, p. 114.

  22. 22.

    Case T-561/18, p. 123.

  23. 23.

    §§44–46 2012 SGEI Framework.

  24. 24.

    §18 2012 SGEI Framework.

  25. 25.

    Notifications of USO compensations have so far concerned incumbents that have always delivered the USO and not postal operators that would start delivering it.

  26. 26.

    Case T-316/18, p. 198.

  27. 27.

    Case T-561/18, p. 294.

  28. 28.

    §25 2012 SGEI Framework.

  29. 29.

    Part B of Annex I to Directive 2008/6/EC of 20 February 2008 amending Directive 97/67/EC with regard to the full accomplishment of the internal market of Community postal services, OJ L 52, 27.2.2008, p.3.

  30. 30.

    Ibidem, p. 110.

  31. 31.

    Case T-316/18, p. 312.

  32. 32.

    Case T-561/18, p. 155.

  33. 33.

    Ibidem, p. 157.

  34. 34.

    Ibidem, p. 146.

  35. 35.

    Ibidem, p. 142.

  36. 36.

    Case T-316/18, p. 181.

  37. 37.

    Case T-316/18, p. 187.

  38. 38.

    Case T-561/18, p. 170–173.

  39. 39.

    The T-561/18 judgment has been appealed before the Court of Justice (case C-442/21P).

  40. 40.

    Ibidem, p. 173.

References

  • Council. (2015). Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 of 13 July 2015 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU, OJ L 248, 24.9.2015, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frontier Economics. (2013). Study on the principles used to calculate the net costs of the postal USO.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandra Fratini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fratini, A., Chovino, M. (2023). The First Tests of the SGEI Framework in the Postal Sector: Takeaways from the Judgements in the Česká pošta and Post Danmark Cases. In: Parcu, P.L., Brennan, T.J., Glass, V. (eds) The Postal and Delivery Contribution in Hard Times. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-11413-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics