Skip to main content

Clinical Stages and Ordinal Outcomes in Portal Hypertension

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 684 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of clinical stages of cirrhosis has been introduced to identify distinct clinical conditions in the course of the disease with a different outcome severity. The term “clinical” has been used to underscore that they do not necessarily correspond to a pathophysiological progression, and therefore do not occur in a predictable sequence. The two major stages are compensated and decompensated cirrhosis based on the presence or history of any variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and jaundice (although the role of jaundice in this definition is currently under debate). Six substages have been proposed: (1) the absence of esophageal varices without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) defined by the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) <10 mmHg, (2) no varices with CSPH, and (3) varices in compensated cirrhosis; (4) variceal bleeding without other decompensating events, (5) any single nonbleeding decompensating event; (6) ≥2 of any decompensating events. The six proposed stages are characterized by a progressive increase of the 5-year risk of mortality, from 1.5% in stages 1–2 to 88% in stage 6. This gradual increase of the risk across stages fits well with the concept of ordinal outcomes which are outcome indicators rank-ordered according to severity. The relationship between the clinical stages of cirrhosis and ordinal outcomes and the applicability of ordinal outcomes in portal hypertension and cirrhosis is illustrated in this chapter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ginés P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, Terés J, Bruguera M, Rimola A, Caballería J, Rodés J, Rozman C. Compensated cirrhosis. Natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1987;7:122–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:468–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Planas R, Montoliu S, Ballestè B, Rivera M, Mireia M, Masnou H, et al. Natural history of patients hospitalized for management of cirrhotic ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1385–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D’Amico G, Morabito A, D’Amico M, Pasta L, Malizia G, Rebora P, Valsecchi MG. Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):563–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saunders JB, Walters JRF, Davies P, Paton A. A 20-year prospective study of cirrhosis. Brit Med J. 1981;282:263–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1749–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D’Amico G, Perricone G. Prediction of decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis: does etiology matter? Curr Hepatol Rep. 2019;18:144–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Papatheodoridis GV, Hadziyannis ES, Deutsch M, Hadziyannis SJ. Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis: final results of a 12-year, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(8):2063–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. De Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, Baveno VII Faculty. Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno VII consensus workshop: personalized care in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D’Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, D’Amico M, Caltagirone M, Malizia G, et al. Competing risks and prognostic stages in cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort study of 494 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:1180–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Villanueva C, Albillos A, Jenescà J, Abraldes J, Calleca JL, Aracil C, et al. Development of hyperdinamic circulation and response to β-blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2016;63:197–206.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Jordan Elm J. Evolution of the modified Rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. 2017;48:2007–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1597–608.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2254–61.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Turco L, Garcia-Tsao G, Magnani I, Bianchini M, Costetti M, Caporali C, Colopi S, et al. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and C-reactive protein as prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;68:949–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilatation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:1272–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Abraldes JG, Trebicka J, Chalasani N, D’Amico G, Rockey D, Sha V, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G. Prioritization of therapeutic targets and trial design in cirrhotic portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2019;69:1287–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(1):45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray GD, Barer D, Choi S, Fernandes H, Gregson B, Lees K, et al. Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:511–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Perel P, Edwards P, Roberts I, Murray GD, Maas AIR, et al. The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2011;15:R127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data (Wiley series in probability and statistics). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. D’Amico G, Abraldes JG, Rebora P, Valsecchi MG, Garcia-Tsao G. Ordinal outcomes are superior to binary outcomes for designing and evaluating clinical trials in compensated cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2020;72(3):1029–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Harrell FE Jr, Margolis PA, Gove S, Mason KE, Mulholland EK, Lehmann D. Development of a clinical prediction model for an ordinal outcome: the World Health Organization multicentre study of clinical signs and etiological agents of pneumonia, sepsis and meningitis in young infants. Stat Med. 1998;17:909–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Whitehead J. Sample size calculations for ordered categorical-data. Stat Med. 1993;12:2257–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

D’Amico, G. (2022). Clinical Stages and Ordinal Outcomes in Portal Hypertension. In: de Franchis, R. (eds) Portal Hypertension VII. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08551-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08552-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics