Abstract
The concept of clinical stages of cirrhosis has been introduced to identify distinct clinical conditions in the course of the disease with a different outcome severity. The term “clinical” has been used to underscore that they do not necessarily correspond to a pathophysiological progression, and therefore do not occur in a predictable sequence. The two major stages are compensated and decompensated cirrhosis based on the presence or history of any variceal bleeding, ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and jaundice (although the role of jaundice in this definition is currently under debate). Six substages have been proposed: (1) the absence of esophageal varices without clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) defined by the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) <10 mmHg, (2) no varices with CSPH, and (3) varices in compensated cirrhosis; (4) variceal bleeding without other decompensating events, (5) any single nonbleeding decompensating event; (6) ≥2 of any decompensating events. The six proposed stages are characterized by a progressive increase of the 5-year risk of mortality, from 1.5% in stages 1–2 to 88% in stage 6. This gradual increase of the risk across stages fits well with the concept of ordinal outcomes which are outcome indicators rank-ordered according to severity. The relationship between the clinical stages of cirrhosis and ordinal outcomes and the applicability of ordinal outcomes in portal hypertension and cirrhosis is illustrated in this chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–31.
Ginés P, Quintero E, Arroyo V, Terés J, Bruguera M, Rimola A, Caballería J, Rodés J, Rozman C. Compensated cirrhosis. Natural history and prognostic factors. Hepatology. 1987;7:122–8.
D’Amico G, Morabito A, Pagliaro L, Marubini E. Survival and prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci. 1986;31:468–75.
Planas R, Montoliu S, Ballestè B, Rivera M, Mireia M, Masnou H, et al. Natural history of patients hospitalized for management of cirrhotic ascites. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1385–94.
D’Amico G, Morabito A, D’Amico M, Pasta L, Malizia G, Rebora P, Valsecchi MG. Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):563–76.
Saunders JB, Walters JRF, Davies P, Paton A. A 20-year prospective study of cirrhosis. Brit Med J. 1981;282:263–36.
Tsochatzis EA, Bosch J, Burroughs AK. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1749–61.
D’Amico G, Perricone G. Prediction of decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis: does etiology matter? Curr Hepatol Rep. 2019;18:144–56.
Papatheodoridis GV, Hadziyannis ES, Deutsch M, Hadziyannis SJ. Ursodeoxycholic acid for primary biliary cirrhosis: final results of a 12-year, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(8):2063–70.
De Franchis R, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G, Reiberger T, Ripoll C, Baveno VII Faculty. Renewing consensus in portal hypertension. Report of the Baveno VII consensus workshop: personalized care in portal hypertension. J Hepatol. 2022;76(4):959–74.
D’Amico G, Pasta L, Morabito A, D’Amico M, Caltagirone M, Malizia G, et al. Competing risks and prognostic stages in cirrhosis: a 25-year inception cohort study of 494 patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:1180–19.
Villanueva C, Albillos A, Jenescà J, Abraldes J, Calleca JL, Aracil C, et al. Development of hyperdinamic circulation and response to β-blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2016;63:197–206.
Broderick JP, Adeoye O, Jordan Elm J. Evolution of the modified Rankin scale and its use in future stroke trials. Stroke. 2017;48:2007–12.
Villanueva C, Albillos A, Genescà J, Garcia-Pagan JC, Calleja JL, Aracil C, et al. β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1597–608.
Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, Grace ND, Burroughs AK, Planas R, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2254–61.
Turco L, Garcia-Tsao G, Magnani I, Bianchini M, Costetti M, Caporali C, Colopi S, et al. Cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and C-reactive protein as prognostic indicators in compensated and decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;68:949–58.
Bernardi M, Moreau R, Angeli P, Schnabl B, Arroyo V. Mechanisms of decompensation and organ failure in cirrhosis: from peripheral arterial vasodilatation to systemic inflammation hypothesis. J Hepatol. 2015;63:1272–84.
Abraldes JG, Trebicka J, Chalasani N, D’Amico G, Rockey D, Sha V, Bosch J, Garcia-Tsao G. Prioritization of therapeutic targets and trial design in cirrhotic portal hypertension. Hepatology. 2019;69:1287–99.
Scott SC, Goldberg MS, Mayo NE. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(1):45–55.
Murray GD, Barer D, Choi S, Fernandes H, Gregson B, Lees K, et al. Design and analysis of phase III trials with ordered outcome scales: the concept of the sliding dichotomy. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22:511–7.
Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Perel P, Edwards P, Roberts I, Murray GD, Maas AIR, et al. The added value of ordinal analysis in clinical trials: an example in traumatic brain injury. Crit Care. 2011;15:R127.
Agresti A. Analysis of ordinal categorical data (Wiley series in probability and statistics). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2010.
D’Amico G, Abraldes JG, Rebora P, Valsecchi MG, Garcia-Tsao G. Ordinal outcomes are superior to binary outcomes for designing and evaluating clinical trials in compensated cirrhosis. Hepatology. 2020;72(3):1029–42.
Harrell FE Jr, Margolis PA, Gove S, Mason KE, Mulholland EK, Lehmann D. Development of a clinical prediction model for an ordinal outcome: the World Health Organization multicentre study of clinical signs and etiological agents of pneumonia, sepsis and meningitis in young infants. Stat Med. 1998;17:909–44.
Whitehead J. Sample size calculations for ordered categorical-data. Stat Med. 1993;12:2257–71.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
D’Amico, G. (2022). Clinical Stages and Ordinal Outcomes in Portal Hypertension. In: de Franchis, R. (eds) Portal Hypertension VII. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08552-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08551-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08552-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)