Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Persisting and Reoccurring Liability of Newness: Entrepreneurship and Change in Small Enterprises

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurship and Change

  • 363 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the challenges of entrepreneurship and change facing small enterprises. Developing Stinchcombe’s liability of newness concept to recognise the persisting and reoccurring liability of newness for small enterprises, Wapshott and Mallett develop insights into the challenges of entrepreneurship and change. They argue that, in recognising the challenges facing start-ups, which are new in the sense that they are ‘young,’ analysis should also account for how small enterprises encounter novel challenges, associated with the ways in which external pressures demand new responses from within the organisation. Drawing on Stinchcombe’s liability of newness concept, Wapshott and Mallett outline a sociology of entrepreneurship perspective for analysing how small enterprises cope with challenges of entrepreneurship and change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abatecola, G., Cafferata, R., & Poggesi, S. (2012). Arthur Stinchcombe’s “liability of newness”: Contribution and impact of the construct. Journal of Management History, 18(4), 402–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abatecola, G., & Uli, V. (2016). Entrepreneurial competences, liability of newness and infant survival: Evidence from the service industry. Journal of Management Development, 35(9), 1082–1097.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Auster, E. R. (1986). Even dwarfs started small: Liabilities of age and size and their strategic implications. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8(1), 165–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Yang, T. (2012). What did Stinchcombe really mean? Designing research to test the liability of newness among new ventures. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(3), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. A. C. (1996). Organizational ecology. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 77–114). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruderl, J., & Schussler, R. (1990). Organizational mortality: The liabilities of newness and adolescence. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 530–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, C., Nadin, S., Gray, M., & Clegg, C. (2002). Exploring human resource management practices in small and medium sized enterprises. Personnel Review, 31(6), 671–692.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J. (1972). Organization structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 6(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child, J., & Kieser, A. (1981). Development of organizations over time. In P. C. Nystrom & W. H. Starbuck (Eds.), Handbook of organizational design, Vol. 1, Adapting organizations to their environments (pp. 28–64). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Y. R., & Shepherd, D. A. (2005). Stakeholder perceptions of age and other dimensions of newness. Journal of Management, 31(4), 573–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coad, A. (2018). Firm age: A survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28(1), 13–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fichman, M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1991). Honeymoons and the liability of adolescence: A new perspective on duration dependence in social and organizational relationships. The Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 442–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 48(5), 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. American Sociological Review, 49(2), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundmark, E., Coad, A., Frankish, J. S., & Storey, D. J. (2020). The liability of volatility and how it changes over time among new ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44(5), 933–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moule, C. (1998). Regulation of work in small firms: A view from the inside. Work, Employment & Society, 12(4), 635–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Toole, J., & Ciuchta, M. P. (2020). The liability of newer than newness: Aspiring entrepreneurs and legitimacy. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 26(3), 539–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainnie, A. (1989). Industrial relations in small firms: Small isn’t beautiful. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M. (1999). Managing autonomy: Employment relations in small professional service firms. International Small Business Journal, 17(2), 13–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., & Edwards, P. (2003). Praising Caesar not burying him: What we know about employment relations in small firms. Work, Employment and Society, 17(4), 719–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, M., Edwards, P., Gilman, M., & Arrowsmith, J. (2001). The dynamics of informality: Employment relations in small firms and effects of regulatory change. Work, Employment and Society, 15(4), 845–861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A., Douglas, E. J., & Shanley, M. (2000). New venture survival: Ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Simeone, A., Sirén, C., & Antretter, T. (2020). New venture survival: A review and extension. International Journal of Management Reviews, 22(4), 378–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starbuck, W. H. (1965). Organizational growth and development. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 451–533). Rand McNally College Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Rand McNally College Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968). Constructing social theories. Harcourt, Brace, and World, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stinchcombe, A. L. (2001). When formality works: Authority and abstraction in law and organizations. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S., & Amit, R. (2003). Learning about failure: Bankruptcy, firm age, and the resource-based view. Organization Science, 14(5), 497–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshott, R., & Mallett, O. (2015). Managing human resources in small and medium-sized enterprises: Entrepreneurship and the employment relationship. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wapshott, R., & Mallett, O. (2021). HRM in small and medium-sized enterprises. In A. Wilkinson & T. Dundon (Eds.), Contemporary human resource management: Text and cases 6E (pp. 469–485). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh, J. A., & White, J. F. (1981, July–August). A small business is not a little big business. Harvard Business Review, 59, 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, T., Bao, J., & Aldrich, H. (2020). The paradox of resource provision in entrepreneurial teams: Between self-interest and the collective enterprise. Organization Science, 31(6), 1336–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Haydn Green Institute, Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

    Robert Wapshott

  2. Stirling Management School, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK

    Oliver Mallett

Authors
  1. Robert Wapshott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Oliver Mallett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Wapshott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Management, University of Bolton, Bolton, UK

    Denis Hyams-Ssekasi

  2. Liverpool Business School, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK

    Fredrick Agboma

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wapshott, R., Mallett, O. (2022). Persisting and Reoccurring Liability of Newness: Entrepreneurship and Change in Small Enterprises. In: Hyams-Ssekasi, D., Agboma, F. (eds) Entrepreneurship and Change. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07139-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation