Skip to main content

The Role of Prototypicality in Educational Leadership

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse

Abstract

Educational leadership studies often portray schools as homogeneous professional communities that automatically and willingly endorse the leadership of school principals. For this reason, leadership preparation programs usually include a static set of administrative, technical, and financial skills necessary to operate schools and prompt followers (in-school stakeholders) to engage in actions toward predetermined goals. However, schools are not usually homogeneous communities, but rather they involve informal social groups who potentially have different expectations about the traits and behaviors of school principals. This also suggests that there can be different evaluations about the leadership of the same school principal. In other words, competencies acquired in leadership preparation programs can transform school principals into leaders only in the eyes of social groups whose expectations are met through those competencies. At this point, it should be noted that formal authority does not always bring about leadership and that school principals must get the endorsement of followers to attain leadership status. To be more precise, leadership in schools is co-constructed by school principals and followers rather than being granted by formal authority. Accordingly, relational competencies are needed to create an (if not the) appropriate context through relationship building for the construction of leadership. The preparation of educational leaders is solely not the work of ensuring school principals are equipped with the skills they need for their formal roles. They should first gain the relational skills that can help with the approval of their leadership by social groups in schools possibly carrying rather different leadership expectations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson, M. (2020). Upbeat leadership: A recipe for–or against–“successful” leadership studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(6), 101439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, K., & Bar-Lev, S. (2013). Motivation to lead in multicultural organizations: The role of work scripts and political perceptions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aslan, H., & Karip, E. (2014). Okul müdürlerinin liderlik standartlarının geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 20(3), 255–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogotch, I., Bauer, S., & Su-Keene, E. (2019). New beginnings, repeated: The continuing search for educational leadership. Research in Educational Administration & Leadership, 4(1), 110–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, C. L., & English, F. W. (2010). De-constructing the logic/emotion binary in educational leadership preparation and practice. Journal of Educational Administration, 48(5), 561–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodbeck, F. C., Frese, M., Akerblom, S., Audia, G., Bakacsi, G., Bendova, H., … Wunderer, R. (2000). Cultural variation of leadership prototypes across 22 European countries. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. J. (2018). In the minds of followers: Follower-centric approaches to leadership. In J. Antonakis & D. V. Day (Eds.), The nature of leadership (pp. 82–108). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, J. L. (2013). Diversity leadership: Influence of ethnicity, gender, and minority status. Open Journal of Leadership, 2(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. M. (1989). The marginalization of black executives. Social Problems, 36(4), 317–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (2004). Developing leadership capability: What’s inside the black box? Academy of Management Perspectives, 18(3), 136–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, P. T., & Foti, R. (2015). If you’re not with me you’re...? Examining prototypes and cooperation in leader–follower relationships. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(2), 161–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunliffe, A. L., & Eriksen, M. (2011). Relational leadership. Human Relations, 64(11), 1425–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, S., Darling-Hammond, L., LaPointe, M., & Meyerson, D. (2005). School leadership study: Developing successful principals. Review of research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, Stanford Educational Leadership Institute. Commissioned by the Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from http://www.srnleads.org/data/pdfs/sls/sls_rr.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • deLeon, M. J., & Brunner, C. C. (2013). Cycles of fear: A model of lesbian and gay educational leaders’ lived experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 49(1), 161–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dimmock, C., & Walker, A. (2005). Educational leadership: Culture and diversity. London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan, J. P., Komives, S. R., & Segar, T. C. (2009). College student capacity for socially responsible leadership: Understanding norms and influences of race, gender, and sexual orientation. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 45(4), 927–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chin, J. L. (2010). Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist, 65(3), 216–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrich, L. C., & English, F. W. (2013). Leadership as dance: A consideration of the applicability of the ‘mother’ of all arts as the basis for establishing connoisseurship. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 16(4), 454–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2003). Cookie-cutter leaders for cookie-cutter schools: The teleology of standardization and the de-legitimization of the university in educational leadership preparation. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 2(1), 27–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2006). The unintended consequences of a standardized knowledge base in advancing educational leadership preparation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 42(3), 461–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2007). The art of educational leadership: Balancing performance and accountability. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, F. W. (2012). Bourdieu’s misrecognition: Why educational leadership standards will not reform schools or leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 44(2), 155–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability, and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(2), 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festekjian, A., Tram, S., Murray, C. B., Sy, T., & Huynh, H. P. (2014). I see me the way you see me: The influence of race on interpersonal and intrapersonal leadership perceptions. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(1), 102–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fidan, T., Ayyıldız, P., & Kurt, T. (2021). Eğitim liderliği araştırmalarında deneysel desenlerin yeri. In İ. Aydın, İ. Öztürk, T. G. Demir, Ö. Erdemli, & B. Toptaş (Eds.), Prof Dr. Ali Balcı’ya armağan (pp. 505–516). Ankara, Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (1999). Disappearing acts: Gender, power, and relational practice at work. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (2010). Leadership as relational practice. In K. Bunker, D. T. Hall, & K. E. Kram (Eds.), Extraordinary leadership: Addressing the gaps in senior executive development (pp. 121–136). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. K. (2012). The relational practice of leadership. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 83–106). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, R. J., Fraser, S. L., & Lord, R. G. (1982). Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(3), 326–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P. (2010). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 330–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2005). Teacher leadership: More than just a feel-good factor? Leadership and Policy in Schools, 4(3), 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York, NY: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helgstrand, K. K., & Stuhlmacher, A. F. (1999). National culture: An influence on leader evaluations? The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 7(2), 153–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A., Van Knippenberg, D., & Rast, D. E., III. (2012). Intergroup leadership in organizations: Leading across group and organizational boundaries. Academy of Management Review, 37(2), 232–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, J. G., Boal, K. B., & Sorenson, R. L. (1990). Top management leadership: Inside the black box. The Leadership Quarterly, 1(1), 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISLLC. (2008). Policy standards: ISLLC 2008 as adopted by the National Policy Board for Educational Administration. Washington, DC: CCSSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, P. L., Den Hartog, D. N., Konrad, E., Akerblom, S., Audia, G., Bakacsi, G., … Wunderer, R. (1999). National culture and leadership profiles in Europe: Some results from the GLOBE study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 503–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Köse, M., & Demir, E. (2014). Öğretmenlerin rol modelliği hakkında öğrenci görüşleri. International Journal of Social and Economic Sciences, 4(1), 8–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Xu, X., Grant, L., Strong, J., & Fang, Z. (2017). Professional standards and performance evaluation for principals in China: A policy analysis of the development of principal standards. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 45(2), 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R., & Hall, R. (2003). Identity, leadership categorization, and leadership schema. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 48–64). London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., Brown, D. J., Harvey, J. L., & Hall, R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. The Leadership Quarterly, 12(3), 311–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumby, J., & English, F. (2009). From simplicism to complexity in leadership identity and preparation: Exploring the lineage and dark secrets. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(2), 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maslyn, J. M., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2001). Leader–member exchange and its dimensions: Effects of self-effort and other's effort on relationship quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 697–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxcy, S. J. (1998). Preparing school principals for ethno-democratic leadership. International Journal of Leadership in Education Theory and Practice, 1(3), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medvedeff, M. E., & Lord, R. G. (2007). Implicit leadership theories as dynamic processing structures. In B. Shamir, R. Pillai, M. J. Bligh, & M. Uhl-Bien (Eds.), Follower centered perspectives on leadership: A tribute to the memory of James R. Meindl (pp. 51–70). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertkan, S., Arsan, N., Inal Cavlan, G., & Onurkan Aliusta, G. (2017). Diversity and equality in academic publishing: The case of educational leadership. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 47(1), 46–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, J. W. (2017). Think leader, think heterosexual male? The perceived leadership effectiveness of gay male leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, 34(2), 159–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, J. (2015). The empirical and moral foundations of the ISLLC standards. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(6), 718–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. J., & Taggar, S. (2004). Pathways to informal leadership: The moderating role of gender on the relationship of individual differences and team member network centrality to informal leadership emergence. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(2), 175–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, D., Nguyen, D. T., Wong, B. K. S., & Choy, W. K. W. (2015). A review of Singapore principals’ leadership qualities, styles, and roles. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(4), 512–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, J. D., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely coupled systems: A reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 203–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platow, M. J., Haslam, S. A., Foddy, M., & Grace, D. M. (2003). Leadership as the outcome of self-categorization processes. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 34–47). London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rast, D. E., III, Hogg, M. A., & van Knippenberg, D. (2018). Intergroup leadership across distinct subgroups and identities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(7), 1090–1103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 637–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L. (2003). Status characteristics and leadership. In D. Van Knippenberg & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Leadership and power: Identity processes in groups and organizations (pp. 65–78). London, UK: Sage Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, C. L., & Erickson, K. G. (2000). Creating and spreading status beliefs. American Journal of Sociology, 106(3), 579–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. E., Mueller, R., Lituchy, T., & Liu, J. (1996). Think manager – Think male: A global phenomenon? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17(1), 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. R. (1998). Mental representation and memory. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (pp. 391–445). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swartz, E. (2003). Teaching white preservice teachers: Pedagogy for change. Urban Education, 38(3), 255–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tavares, G. M., Sobral, F., Goldszmidt, R., & Araújo, F. (2018). Opening the implicit leadership theories’ black box: An experimental approach with conjoint analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 100. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G., Martin, R., & Riggio, R. E. (2013). Leading groups: Leadership as a group process. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, S. M., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2012). Cultural constraints on the emergence of women as leaders. Journal of World Business, 47(4), 604–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. In P. A. M. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Tory Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories in social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 399–417). London, UK: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2003). Relationship development as a key ingredient for leadership development. In S. E. Murphy & R. E. Eiggio (Eds.), The future of leadership development (pp. 129–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M. (2006). Relational leadership theory: Exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing. Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 654–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhl-Bien, M., & Ospina, S. M. (2012). Exploring the competing bases for legitimacy in contemporary leadership studies. In M. Uhl-Bien & S. M. Ospina (Eds.), Advancing relational leadership research: A dialogue among perspectives (pp. 1–40). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Group norms, prototypicality, and persuasion. In D. J. Terry & M. A. Hogg (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 157–170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Knippenberg, D. (2011). Embodying who we are: Leader group prototypicality and leadership effectiveness. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1078–1091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., & Wenzel, M. (2005). When “different” means “worse”: In-group prototypicality in changing intergroup contexts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(1), 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldzus, S., Mummendey, A., Wenzel, M., & Weber, U. (2003). Towards tolerance: Representations of superordinate categories and perceived ingroup prototypicality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, A., & Dimmock, C. (2002). Moving school leadership beyond its narrow boundaries: Developing a cross-cultural approach. In K. Leithwood et al. (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration. Springer international handbooks of education (Vol. 8, pp. 167–202). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieczorek, D., & Manard, C. (2018). Instructional leadership challenges and practices of novice principals in rural schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 34(2), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, B. L., Madsen, J., & Young, M. A. (2010). Implementing diversity plans: Principals’ perception of their ability to address diversity in their schools. NASSP Bulletin, 94(2), 135–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuncer Fidan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Fidan, T., Ayyıldız, P. (2022). The Role of Prototypicality in Educational Leadership. In: English, F.W. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Educational Leadership and Management Discourse. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99097-8_124

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics