Skip to main content

The Relationship Between US Stock, Commodity and Virtual Markets During COVID-19 Forced Crisis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Market Dynamics after COVID 19

Part of the book series: Contributions to Finance and Accounting ((CFA))

  • 300 Accesses

Abstract

This study is aiming on investigating the relationship between the US stock, commodity, and virtual markets. Using a vector autoregressive model, we study the impulse response signal over the period going from December 02, 2019, to May 28, 2021, catching the time of the first appearance of the coronavirus pandemic. Our results outcomes that the commodity and cryptocurrency markets behave the same way for the S & P 500 stock market during the pandemic while the response of the commodity market is respectively unbalanced and positive for the US stock and cryptocurrencies markets. The virtual market, on the other hand, is found to behave differently when there is shocks emanating from the remaining two markets. In terms of variance decomposition, we realize that the commodity market explains 21% of the forecast error variance in the U.S. stock market which is the highest share of forecast for the three markets during the sanitary crisis. Our finding clarifies the necessity for investors to take into account the dependence of the three markets understudy to make better investment policies during a crisis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Goldman Sachs Commodity Index (GSCI) is a commodity index that gather 24 traded futures on commodity exchanges. It was first calculated by Goldman Sachs before being taken over by Standard Poor’s; hence, the notation S&P GSCI.

  2. 2.

    The suitable lag length selection criteria was found via the AIC information criteria test and results show that four lags are relevant for our model.

References

  • Baur, D. G., Dimpfl, T., & Kuck, K. (2018). Bitcoin, gold and the US dollar – A replication and extension. Finance Research Letters, 25, 103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouri, E., Molnár, P., Azzi, G., Roubaud, D., & Hagfors, L. I. (2017). On the hedge and safe haven properties of bitcoin: Is it really more than a diversifier? Finance Research Letters, 20, 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouri, E., Shahzad, S. J. H., Roubaud, D., Kristoufek, L., & Lucey, B. (2020). Bitcoin, gold, and commodities as safe havens for stocks: New insight through wavelet analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 77, 156–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciaian, P., Rajcaniova, M., & Kancs, d. (2016). The economics of bitcoin price formation. Applied Economics, 48(19), 1799–1815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbet, S., Meegan, A., Larkin, C., Lucey, B., & Yarovaya, L. (2018). Exploring the dynamic relationships between cryptocurrencies and other financial assets. Economics Letters, 165, 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derbali, A., & Chebbi, T. (2018). Dynamic equicorrelation between s&p500 index and s&p gsci.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyhrberg, A. H. (2016). Bitcoin, gold and the dollar – A garch volatility analysis. Finance Research Letters, 16, 85–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, J. C. S. (2017). Analyzing bitcoin price volatility. University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goczek, Ł., & Skliarov, I. (2019). What drives the bitcoin price? A factor augmented error correction mechanism investigation. Applied Economics, 51(59), 6393–6410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, R., & Wohar, M. (2017). Forecasting oil and stock returns with a qual var using over 150 years off data. Energy Economics, 62, 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Q., Zhang, D., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Searching for safe-haven assets during the covid-19 pandemic. International Review of Financial Analysis, 71, 101526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, D., Meng, L., & Wang, Y. (2020). Oil price shocks and Chinese economy revisited: New evidence from svar model with sign restrictions. International Review of Economics & Finance, 69, 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, S. (2008). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Cryptography Mailing list at https://metzdowd.com.

  • Nordin, N., Nordin, S., & Ismail, R. (2014). The impact of commodity prices, interest rate and exchange rate on stock market performance: An empirical analysis from Malaysia. Malaysian Management Journal, 18, 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papapetrou, E. (2001). Oil price shocks, stock market, economic activity and employment in Greece. Energy Economics, 23(5), 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravnik, R., & Žilić, I. (2011). The use of svar analysis in determining the effects of fiscal shocks in Croatia. Financial Theory and Practice, 35(1), 25–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, C. A. (1980). Comparison of interwar and postwar business cycles: Monetarism reconsidered. The American Economic Review, 70(2), 250–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, S. (2020). Effect of covid-19 on capital market with reference to s&p 500. Available at SSRN 3640871.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wijk, D. (2013). What can be expected from the bitcoin. Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Chen, X., & Zhao, P. (2020). The relationship between bitcoin and stock market. International Journal of Operations Research and Information Systems (IJORIS), 11(2), 22–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wątorek, M., Drożdż, S., Kwapień, J., Minati, L., Oświęcimka, P., & Stanuszek, M. (2020). Multiscale characteristics of the emerging global cryptocurrency market. Physics Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, B., Stuart, L., Tu, A., & Zhang, T. (2020). Analysis of the effect of covid-19 on the stock market and investing strategies. Available at SSRN 3563380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yousaf, I., & Ali, S. (2021). Linkages between stock and cryptocurrency markets during the covid-19 outbreak: An intraday analysis. Singapore Economic Review.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ben Osman, M., Naoui, K. (2022). The Relationship Between US Stock, Commodity and Virtual Markets During COVID-19 Forced Crisis. In: Goutte, S., Guesmi, K., Urom, C. (eds) Financial Market Dynamics after COVID 19 . Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98542-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics