Abstract
The COVID-19 virus proliferated from its first emergence to a global phenomenon becoming a pandemic as declared by the World Health Organization on 11th March 2020. This sanitary emergency obliged people to suddenly face several changes in their way of life due to imposed countries’ lockdown and social distancing. One of these rapid changes involved schools and universities and, consequently, students and professors: with the sudden lockdown of universities and colleges worldwide, they had to turn the traditional “in presence” classes into online courses. A published survey among Italian academic staff and students allowed to identify and highlight the factors that affect ergonomics of workstation (learning and teaching workplace), postural and environmental comfort and teaching/learning effectiveness.
This paper would like to give guidelines to set the right home environment and the timing of learning/teaching activities to improve global comfort, both for students and teachers, and improve learning effectiveness. Thirty-Five Master Degree students were involved in the experiment during the second-semester lessons (during Italian lockdown) and were asked to fill questionnaires and check their learning outcomes by answering multiple-choice tests. Data were statistically processed, and results were used to create guidelines to set the learning home-environment at best, where and when possible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
World Health Organization: Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic
Mulla, Z., Osland-Paton, V., Rodriguez, M., Vazquez, E., Plavsic, S.: Novel coronavirus, novel faculty development programs: rapid transition to eLearning during the pandemic. J. Perinat. Med. 48, 446–449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2020-0197
Girik Allo, M.: Is the online learning good in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic? The case of EFL learners. J. Sinestesia 10, 1–10 (2020)
Bright, C., Lindsay, E., Lowe, D., Murray, S., Liu, D.: Factors that impact learning outcomes in Remote Laboratories (2008)
IULM: Online teaching: the testimonials of students and teachers. https://www.iulm.it/it/news-ed-eventi/news/didattica-online-testimonianze-docenti-studenti
Reyes-Chua, E., Sibbaluca, B.G., Miranda, R.D., Palmario, G.B., Moreno, R.P., Solon, J.P.T.: The status of the implementation of the e-learning classroom in selected higher education institutions in region IV - a amidst the covid-19 crisis. J. Crit. Rev. 7, 253–258 (2020). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.11.41
Robertson, M., Vink, P.: Examining new ways of office work between the Netherlands and the USA. Work 41, 5086–5090 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-2012-1042-5086
Kurland, N., Cooper, C.: Manager control and employee isolation in telecommuting environments. J. High Technol. Manage. Res. 13, 107–126 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(01)00051-7
Xu, J.: Investigating factors that influence conventional distraction and tech-related distraction in math homework. Comput. Educ. 81, 304–314 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.024
Calderwood, C., Ackerman, P.L., Conklin, E.M.: What else do college students “do” while studying? An investigation of multitasking. Comput. Educ. 75, 19–29 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.004
Dietz, S., Henrich, C.: Texting as a distraction to learning in college students. Comput. Human Behav. 36, 163–167 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.045
Wallis, C.: The multitasking generation. Time 167, 48–55 (2006)
David, P., Kim, J.-H., Brickman, J.S., Ran, W., Curtis, C.M.: Mobile phone distraction while studying. New Media Soc. 17, 1661–1679 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814531692
Fiorillo, I., Anzisi, F.J., Carbone, A., Califano, R., Naddeo, A.: A comfort evaluation tool for sitting postures: the case of Library chairs. In: WORK (2019)
Piro, S., Fiorillo, I., Anjani, S., Smulders, M., Naddeo, A., Vink, P.: Towards comfortable communication in future vehicles. Appl. Ergon. 78, 210–216 (2018)
Naddeo, A., Fasulo, L., Vallone, M.: Ergonomic analysis and comfort driven redesign of student classroom combo desks at university of Salerno (Italy). J. Ind. Des. Eng. Graph. 10, 33–44 (2015)
Castellucci, H.I., Arezes, P.M., Viviani, C.A.: Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools. Appl. Ergon. 41, 563–568 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2009.12.001
Dianat, I., Karimi, M.A., Asl Hashemi, A., Bahrampour, S.: Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data. Appl. Ergon. 44, 101–108 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.004
Honan, M.: Mobile work: ergonomics in a rapidly changing work environment. Work 52, 289–301 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-152164
Hamberg-van Reenen, H.H., van der Beek, A.J., Blatter, B.M., van der Grinten, M.P., van Mechelen, W., Bongers, P.M.: Does musculoskeletal discomfort at work predict future musculoskeletal pain? Ergonomics 51, 637–648 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701743433
Alessandro, N., Sandro, M.: Postural comfort inside a car: Development of an innovative model to evaluate the discomfort level. SAE Int. J. Passeng. Cars – Mech. Syst. 2, 1065–1070 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-1163
Ng, P.K., Jee, K., Yee Lim, S.: Development of ergonomics guidelines for improved sitting postures in the classroom among Malaysian University students. Am. J. Appl. Sci. 13, 907–912 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2016.907.912
Michael, A., Heracleous, C.: Assessment of natural lighting performance and visual comfort of educational architecture in Southern Europe: the case of typical educational school premises in Cyprus. Energy Build. 140, 443–457 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.087
Cajochen, C., et al.: Effect of daylight LED on visual comfort, melatonin, mood, waking performance and sleep. Light. Res. Technol. 51, 1044–1062 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477153519828419
Marchand, G.C., Nardi, N.M., Reynolds, D., Pamoukov, S.: The impact of the classroom built environment on student perceptions and learning. J. Environ. Psychol. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.06.009
Higgins, S., Hall, E., Wall, K., Woolner, P., McCaughey, C.: The impact of school environments: a literature review. The Centre for Learning and Teaching, School of Education, Communication and Language Science, University of Newcastle (2005)
Galinsky, T., Swanson, N., Sauter, S., Hurrell, J.J., Schleifer, L.M.: A field study of supplementary rest breaks for data-entry operators. Ergonomics 43, 622–638 (2000)
Naddeo, A., Califano, R., Fiorillo, I.: Identifying factors that influenced wellbeing and learning effectiveness during the sudden transition into eLearning due to the COVID-19 lockdown. Work, 1–23 (2021, Preprint). https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-203358
Grinten, M.P.: Development of a practical method for measuring body part discomfort. Adv. Ind. Ergon. Saf. 4, 311–318 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fiorillo, I., Califano, R., Naddeo, A. (2022). The New Ergonomic Paradigm for Academic Learning Environments During Covid-19 Lockdown. In: Rizzi, C., Campana, F., Bici, M., Gherardini, F., Ingrassia, T., Cicconi, P. (eds) Design Tools and Methods in Industrial Engineering II. ADM 2021. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_75
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91234-5_75
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-91233-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-91234-5
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)