Abstract
The complexity and rapid evolution of the management of valvular heart disease merit a patient-centered approach that prioritizes patients’ preferences. Shared decision-making is an evidence-based bidirectional process that involves an individualized and intentional exchange between patients, family, and health care providers that integrates patients’ values and priorities to reach a high-quality consensus treatment decision. Shared decision-making is widely endorsed by international valvular heart disease guidelines and increasingly integrated in clinical practice. Patient decision aids are evidence-based tools that facilitate shared decision-making. Strategies to address individual issues related to communication, health inequities and access to care can help ensure a truly patient-focused management of valvular heart disease.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Coylewright M, Palmer R, O’Neil E, et al. Patient-defined goals for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: a quantitative analysis. Health Expect. 2016;19(5):1036–43.
Committee on Quality health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK22857/. Accessed Jan 2021.
Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision-making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94(3):291–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec2013.10.031. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399113004722. Accessed Jan 2021.
Ubel PA, Scherr KA, Fagerlin A. Empowerment failure: how shortcomings in physician communication unwittingly undermine patient autonomy. Am J Bioeth. 2017;17(11):31. http://www.bioethics.net/articles/empowerment-failure-how-shortcomings-in-physician-communication-unwittingly-undermine-patient-autonomy/. Accessed Jan 2021.
Alston C, Berger Z, Brownlee S, et al. Shared decision-making strategies for best care. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2014. https://nam.edu/wpcontent/uploads/2015/06/SDMforBestCare2.pdf. Accessed Dec 2020.
Clayman M, Gulbrandsen P, Moris M. A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(3):600–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.016. https://ww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27780646. Accessed Dec 2020.
Yancy W. COVID-19 and African Americans. JAMA. 2020;323:1891. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2764789. Accessed Dec 2020.
Gaasch WH. Natural history, epidemiology, and prognosis of aortic stenosis. 2017. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/natural-history-epidemiology-and-prognosis-of-aortic-stenosis. Accessed Nov 2017.
Ryffel C, Lanz J, Corpataux N, et al. Mortality, stroke and hospitalizations associated with deferred versus expedited aortic valve replacement in patients referred for symptomatic severe aortic stenosis during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(9):e2020402. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.20402. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2771036?utm_source=For_The_Media&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ftm_links&utm_term=093020. Accessed Jan 2021.
Campo J, Tsoris A, Kruse J, et al. Prognosis of severe asymptomatic aortic stenosis with and without surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;108:74. https://www.tctmd.com/news/survival-better-early-avr-severe-asymptomatic-aortic-stenosis-says-retrospective-study. Accessed Jan 2021.
Malaisrie SC, McDonald E, Kruse J, et al. Mortality while waiting for aortic valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98:1564–71.
Matthias MS, Salyers MP, Frankel R. Re-thinking shared decision-making: context matters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(2):176–9. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/s0738399113000347. Accessed Dec 2017.
Tulsky JA, Beach MC, Butow PN, et al. A research agenda for communication between health care professionals and patients living with serious illness. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(9):1361–6. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2015.
O’Connor AM, Stacey D, Jacobsen M. Ottawa personal decision guide. Ottawa, ON: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute & University of Ottawa Canada; 2020. https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/das/OPDG.pdf. Accessed Jan 2021.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palmer, R. (2022). Making a High-Quality Treatment Decision: Shared Decision-Making. In: Hawkey, M.C., Lauck, S.B. (eds) Valvular Heart Disease. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86233-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86233-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86232-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86233-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)