Skip to main content

Practice Enterprise and MOOCs in Higher Education Real and Perceived Performances

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Do Machines Dream of Electric Workers?

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 49))

  • 413 Accesses

Abstract

The paper aims to present and discuss the results of a performance research related to the fusion between two advanced teaching methodologies and their latest evolutions: the practice enterprise (PE) and the massive open online courses (MOOC). Ongoing practices encourage the extension of experience to the synergy between PE and MOOC with particular attention to the preparation of different roles of the teaching staff represented by teachers, tutors and mentors. The hypothesis concerns how to evaluate PE and MOOC with the same methodology, distinguishing the real performances from the perceived ones. This result would pave the way for a common platform to use these advanced teachings together, perfecting their implementation. The document wants to argue that this fusion is not only possible but also necessary to implement the preparation of teachers for further diffusion of these innovative didactics in higher education programmes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    HEIPNET: Inclusion of Innovative Work-Based-Learning and Business Partnerships in HEI Curricula Development, Erasmus + Project 2019–2021. n° 2019–1-LT01-KA203-060,514—999,893,752 Partners: University of Graz, Utena University Lithuania,LIBA Association Lithuania, EUROPEN-PEN International, University of Pavia.

  2. 2.

    EUROPEN-PEN International Worldwide Practice Enterprise Network,Essen Germany.

  3. 3.

    Hiim, H., and Hippe, E. 2006. “Praksisveiledning i lærerutdanningen: En didaktisk veiledningsstrategi.” Oslo: Gyldendal akademisk.

  4. 4.

    Perting Ltd., operates in the field of organizational consulting, network and merchandising of ICT products, is the first unit of certified Simulated Enterprise, established by an Italian University. It started up on October 2001 in Forlì Faculty of Economics—Bologna University. http://perting.poloforli.unibo.it/.

  5. 5.

    No Risk Agency, operating from 2008 in Risk Insurance.

  6. 6.

    BECK project integrating education with consumer behaviour relevant to energy efficiency and climate change at the Universities of Russia, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh KA 2 Capacity Building in higher education 01/10/2019—31/11/2021.

  7. 7.

    Strategic Integration of Learning Models-Needs Assessment Analysis.8.06.2015 ISPEHE Innovate Strategic Partnership for European Higher Education Erasmus + Project KA2—Cooperation and Innovation for Good Practices 1/1/2015–31/12/2016.

References

  1. Strazzeri, L. (2020). Soft skills in university education: A real experience. Behave yourself! Soft Skills Development Student Program at the Department of Economics and Business Studies, University of Genoa, Impresa Progetto n 1.Publ. on Line (2020). https://doi.org/10.15167/1824-3576/IPEJM2020.1.1259.

  2. Bratton, J. (Ed.) (2020). Organizational Leadership. SAGE Publications Ltd, ISBN: 9781526460127

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yuan, L., Powell, S., & Olivier, B. (2014). Beyond MOOCs: Sustainable online learning in institutions. CETIS. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.1075.1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smart, K. L., & Csapo, N. (2007) Learning by doing: Engaging students through learner-centered activities. Business and Professionals Communication Quarterly December 1.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ertmer Timothy, P.A., &. Newby, J. (2013). Behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism: comparing critical features from an instructional design perspective, performance improvement quality, performance improvement quarterly. J. Wiley, 26(2), 43–71.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chomsky, N. (1967). Preface to the reprint of A Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavio. In L. A. Jakobovits & M. S. Miron (Eds.), Readings in the psychology of language (pp. 142–143). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jonassen, D. H. (1990). Thinking technology: Toward a Constructivist View of Instructional Design. Educational Technology, 30(9). ISSN 0013-1962.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jona, K., & Naidu S. (eds.). (2014). MOOCs: emerging research. Distance Education, 35(2), 141–144. Publ. on line.https://doi.org/10.1177/10805699070700040302.

  10. Kolmos, A. (2002). Facilitating change to a problem-based model. International Journal for Academic Development, 7(1). Publ. On Line 10 Dec 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hiim, H., & Hippe, E. (2006). Praksisveiledning i lærerutdanningen: En didaktisk veiledningsstrategi. Gyldendal akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Martin, M. (2018). Why we should buldoze business school. The Guardian, Fri 27 Apr (2018) https://www.theguardian.com/news/2018/apr/27

  13. Boyatzis R. E., Stubbs E. C., & Taylor S. N. (2017). Learning cognitive and emotional intelligence competencies through graduate management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2002.8509345.

  14. Morselli, D. (2016). La pedagogia dell’imprenditività nell’educazione secondaria. Formazione & Insegnamento, 14(2), 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves T.C. Reynolds, T. H.(eds.) (2015a). Global reach and local practice. In The Promise of MOOCs. Language Learning & Technology. http://llt.msu.edu/issues.

  16. Brown, M. (2016). MOOCs as social practice: a kaleidoscope of perspectives. Portland Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bonk, C. J., Lee, M. M., Reeves, T. C., & Reynolds, T. H. (eds.) (2015b). MOOCs and open education around the world. Routledge NY

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bianchi, M., Gualdi, D., & Tampieri, L. (2017). The role of organizational ties managed by Practice. The case of Perting Ltd. International Journal of Organizations, 18, 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bianchi, M., Hernandez-Lara, A. B., & Gualdi, D. (2015). The contribution of virtual enterprises to competence-based learning: An assessment from the students’ perspective. Technology, Innovation and Educational Journal, 1(4), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ciappei, C., Laudano, M. C., Zollo, L., & Rialti, R. (2016) Evaluating the quality of entrepreneurial education analysing its ability to increase entrepreneurial attitude and intent of students, Excellence in Services. In 19th Toulon-Verona International Conference, Conference Proceedings (pp. 117–132). Huelva.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bianchi, M., Tampieri, L., Valli Casadei, D., & Paganelli, G. (2016). Real and perceived performances. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 10(10), 1038–1047. ISSN 1548-4583.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bianchi, M., Baseska, M., Tampieri, L Ngo Mai, S., &.Verges J., (eds.) (2014). Beyond the horizon of Tempus Projects. In Theory and practice of project management. Il Ponte Vecchio. ISBN 978-88-654&1-407-1.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Cameron, K. (1986). Effectiveness as paradox: Consensus and conflict in conceptions of organizational effectiveness. Management Science, 32(5), 539–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cameron, K., & Whetten, D. (1977). Some conclusions about organizational effectiveness 1983. In K. Cameron & D. Whetten (Eds.), Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple (pp. 61–278). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Djalali, A. (2017). A didactic perspective on leadership education—focussing on the development of competencies within MBA programs, SteinBeis Edition

    Google Scholar 

  26. Powell, S. (2016). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. Manchester Metropolitan University's Research, e-space.mmu.ac.uk.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tampieri, L. (2020). La valutazione delle performance nel project management. Wolters Kluwer Italia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Bianchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bianchi, M. (2022). Practice Enterprise and MOOCs in Higher Education Real and Perceived Performances. In: Solari, L., Martinez, M., Braccini, A.M., Lazazzara, A. (eds) Do Machines Dream of Electric Workers?. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83321-3_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics