Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification with PET/CT: Applications

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hybrid Cardiac Imaging

  • 664 Accesses

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the USA and worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Duncker DJ, Bache RJ. Regulation of coronary blood flow during exercise. Physiol Rev. 2008;88:1009–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Muller JM, Davis MJ, Chilian WM. Integrated regulation of pressure and flow in the coronary microcirculation. Cardiovasc Res. 1996;32:668–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Canty JM Jr. Coronary pressure-function and steady-state pressure-flow relations during autoregulation in the unanesthetized dog. Circ Res. 1988;63:821–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ, Huang SC, Selin CE, Kuhl DE. Regional myocardial perfusion assessed with N-13 labeled ammonia and positron emission computerized axial tomography. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:209–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gould KL, Schelbert HR, Phelps ME, Hoffman EJ. Noninvasive assessment of coronary stenoses with myocardial perfusion imaging during pharmacologic coronary vasodilatation. V. Detection of 47 percent diameter coronary stenosis with intravenous nitrogen-13 ammonia and emission-computed tomography in intact dogs. Am J Cardiol. 1979;43:200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah A, Schelbert HR, Schwaiger M, Henze E, Hansen H, Selin C, Huang SC. Measurement of regional myocardial blood flow with N-13 ammonia and positron-emission tomography in intact dogs. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985;5:92–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmann SR, Hack S, Tewson T, Welch MJ, Sobel BE. The dependence of accumulation of 13NH3 by myocardium on metabolic factors and its implications for quantitative assessment of perfusion. Circulation. 1980;61:34–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Selwyn AP, Allan RM, L’Abbate A, Horlock P, Camici P, Clark J, O’Brien HA, Grant PM. Relation between regional myocardial uptake of rubidium-82 and perfusion: absolute reduction of cation uptake in ischemia. Am J Cardiol. 1982;50:112–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mullani NA, Goldstein RA, Gould KL, Marani SK, Fisher DJ, O’Brien HA Jr, Loberg MD. Myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82. I. Measurement of extraction fraction and flow with external detectors. J Nucl Med. 1983;24:898–906.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Herrero P, Markham J, Shelton ME, Weinheimer CJ, Bergmann SR. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with rubidium-82 and positron emission tomography. Exploration of a mathematical model. Circulation. 1990;82:1377–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lautamaki R, George RT, Kitagawa K, Higuchi T, Merrill J, Voicu C, DiPaula A, Nekolla SG, Lima JA, Lardo AC, Bengel FM. Rubidium-82 PET-CT for quantitative assessment of myocardial blood flow: validation in a canine model of coronary artery stenosis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36:576–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergmann SR, Fox KA, Rand AL, McElvany KD, Welch MJ, Markham J, Sobel BE. Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O. Circulation. 1984;70:724–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nekolla SG, Reder S, Saraste A, Higuchi T, Dzewas G, Preissel A, Huisman M, Poethko T, Schuster T, Yu M, Robinson S, Casebier D, Henke J, Wester HJ, Schwaiger M. Evaluation of the novel myocardial perfusion positron-emission tomography tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02: comparison to 13N-ammonia and validation with microspheres in a pig model. Circulation. 2009;119:2333–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Manabe O, Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Naya M, deKemp RA, Tamaki N. Repeatability of rest and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 82Rb dynamic PET. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:68–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lortie M, Beanlands RS, Yoshinaga K, Klein R, Dasilva JN, deKemp RA. Quantification of myocardial blood flow with 82Rb dynamic PET imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1765–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin JW, Sciacca RR, Chou RL, Laine AF, Bergmann SR. Quantification of myocardial perfusion in human subjects using 82Rb and wavelet-based noise reduction. J Nucl Med. 2001;42:201–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sdringola S, Johnson NP, Kirkeeide RL, Cid E, Gould KL. Impact of unexpected factors on quantitative myocardial perfusion and coronary flow reserve in young, asymptomatic volunteers. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2011;4:402–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chan SY, Brunken RC, Czernin J, Porenta G, Kuhle W, Krivokapich J, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Comparison of maximal myocardial blood flow during adenosine infusion with that of intravenous dipyridamole in normal men. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20:979–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Czernin J, Muller P, Chan S, Brunken RC, Porenta G, Krivokapich J, Chen K, Chan A, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Influence of age and hemodynamics on myocardial blood flow and flow reserve. Circulation. 1993;88:62–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dayanikli F, Grambow D, Muzik O, Mosca L, Rubenfire M, Schwaiger M. Early detection of abnormal coronary flow reserve in asymptomatic men at high risk for coronary artery disease using positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1994;90:808–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sawada S, Muzik O, Beanlands RS, Wolfe E, Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M. Interobserver and interstudy variability of myocardial blood flow and flow-reserve measurements with nitrogen 13 ammonia-labeled positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1995;2:413–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Beanlands RS, Muzik O, Melon P, Sutor R, Sawada S, Muller D, Bondie D, Hutchins GD, Schwaiger M. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial flow reserve in patients with coronary atherosclerosis using nitrogen-13 ammonia positron emission tomography. Determination of extent of altered vascular reactivity. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:1465–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Czernin J, Auerbach M, Sun KT, Phelps M, Schelbert HR. Effects of modified pharmacologic stress approaches on hyperemic myocardial blood flow. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:575–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. de Jong RM, Blanksma PK, Willemsen AT, Anthonio RL, Meeder JG, Pruim J, Vaalburg W, Lie KI. Posterolateral defect of the normal human heart investigated with nitrogen-13-ammonia and dynamic PET. J Nucl Med. 1995;36:581–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Muzik O, Paridon SM, Singh TP, Morrow WR, Dayanikli F, Di Carli MF. Quantification of myocardial blood flow and flow reserve in children with a history of Kawasaki disease and normal coronary arteries using positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:757–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. DeGrado TR, Hanson MW, Turkington TG, Delong DM, Brezinski DA, Vallee JP, Hedlund LW, Zhang J, Cobb F, Sullivan MJ, Coleman RE. Estimation of myocardial blood flow for longitudinal studies with 13N-labeled ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Nucl Cardiol. 1996;3:494–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nagamachi S, Czernin J, Kim AS, Sun KT, Bottcher M, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1626–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yokoyama I, Murakami T, Ohtake T, Momomura S, Nishikawa J, Sasaki Y, Omata M. Reduced coronary flow reserve in familial hypercholesterolemia. J Nucl Med. 1996;37:1937–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Bottcher M, Czernin J, Sun K, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Effect of beta 1 adrenergic receptor blockade on myocardial blood flow and vasodilatory capacity. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:442–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Campisi R, Czernin J, Karpman HL, Schelbert HR. Coronary vasodilatory capacity and flow reserve in normal myocardium supplied by bypass grafts late after surgery. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80:27–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Muzik O, Duvernoy C, Beanlands RS, Sawada S, Dayanikli F, Wolfe ER Jr, Schwaiger M. Assessment of diagnostic performance of quantitative flow measurements in normal subjects and patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease by means of nitrogen-13 ammonia and positron emission tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:534–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nitzsche EU, Choi Y, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Huang SC, Schelbert HR. Noninvasive quantification of myocardial blood flow in humans. A direct comparison of the [13N]ammonia and the [15O]water techniques. Circulation. 1996;93:2000–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Iida H, Kanno I, Takahashi A, Miura S, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Ono Y, Shishido F, Inugami A, Tomura N, et al. Measurement of absolute myocardial blood flow with H215O and dynamic positron-emission tomography. Strategy for quantification in relation to the partial-volume effect. Circulation. 1988;78:104–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Senneff MJ, Geltman EM, Bergmann SR. Noninvasive delineation of the effects of moderate aging on myocardial perfusion. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:2037–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Araujo LI, Lammertsma AA, Rhodes CG, McFalls EO, Iida H, Rechavia E, Galassi A, De Silva R, Jones T, Maseri A. Noninvasive quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in coronary artery disease with oxygen-15-labeled carbon dioxide inhalation and positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1991;83:875–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamamoto Y, de Silva R, Rhodes CG, Araujo LI, Iida H, Rechavia E, Nihoyannopoulos P, Hackett D, Galassi AR, Taylor CJ, et al. A new strategy for the assessment of viable myocardium and regional myocardial blood flow using 15O-water and dynamic positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1992;86:167–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Uren NG, Melin JA, De Bruyne B, Wijns W, Baudhuin T, Camici PG. Relation between myocardial blood flow and the severity of coronary-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1782–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Laine H, Raitakari OT, Niinikoski H, Pitkanen OP, Iida H, Viikari J, Nuutila P, Knuuti J. Early impairment of coronary flow reserve in young men with borderline hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:147–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Schafers KP, Luscher TF, Camici PG. Low density lipoprotein cholesterol and coronary microvascular dysfunction in hypercholesterolemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:103–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Furuyama H, Odagawa Y, Katoh C, Iwado Y, Yoshinaga K, Ito Y, Noriyasu K, Mabuchi M, Kuge Y, Kobayashi K, Tamaki N. Assessment of coronary function in children with a history of Kawasaki disease using (15)O-water positron emission tomography. Circulation. 2002;105:2878–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Yoshinaga K, Katoh C, Noriyasu K, Iwado Y, Furuyama H, Ito Y, Kuge Y, Kohya T, Kitabatake A, Tamaki N. Reduction of coronary flow reserve in areas with and without ischemia on stress perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a study using oxygen 15-labeled water PET. J Nucl Cardiol. 2003;10:275–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wyss CA, Koepfli P, Mikolajczyk K, Burger C, von Schulthess GK, Kaufmann PA. Bicycle exercise stress in PET for assessment of coronary flow reserve: repeatability and comparison with adenosine stress. J Nucl Med. 2003;44:146–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Herrero P, Markham J, Weinheimer CJ, Anderson CJ, Welch MJ, Green MA, Bergmann SR. Quantification of regional myocardial perfusion with generator-produced 62Cu-PTSM and positron emission tomography. Circulation. 1993;87:173–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Tahari AK, Lee A, Rajaram M, Fukushima K, Lodge MA, Lee BC, Ficaro EP, Nekolla S, Klein R, deKemp RA, Wahl RL, Bengel FM, Bravo PE. Absolute myocardial flow quantification with (82)Rb PET/CT: comparison of different software packages and methods. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:126–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Slomka PJ, Alexanderson E, Jacome R, Jimenez M, Romero E, Meave A, Le Meunier L, Dalhbom M, Berman DS, Germano G, Schelbert H. Comparison of clinical tools for measurements of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow assessed with 13N-ammonia PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:171–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Di Carli M, Czernin J, Hoh CK, Gerbaudo VH, Brunken RC, Huang SC, Phelps ME, Schelbert HR. Relation among stenosis severity, myocardial blood flow, and flow reserve in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation. 1995;91:1944–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Anagnostopoulos C, Almonacid A, El Fakhri G, Curillova Z, Sitek A, Roughton M, Dorbala S, Popma JJ, Di Carli MF. Quantitative relationship between coronary vasodilator reserve assessed by 82Rb PET imaging and coronary artery stenosis severity. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1593–601.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Hajjiri MM, Leavitt MB, Zheng H, Spooner AE, Fischman AJ, Gewirtz H. Comparison of positron emission tomography measurement of adenosine-stimulated absolute myocardial blood flow versus relative myocardial tracer content for physiological assessment of coronary artery stenosis severity and location. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2009;2:751–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kajander SA, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietila M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A, Sipila HT, Teras M, Maki M, Airaksinen J, Hartiala J, Knuuti J. Clinical value of absolute quantification of myocardial perfusion with (15)O-water in coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc imaging. 2011;4:678–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Fiechter M, Ghadri JR, Gebhard C, Fuchs TA, Pazhenkottil AP, Nkoulou RN, Herzog BA, Wyss CA, Gaemperli O, Kaufmann PA. Diagnostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion PET: added value of myocardial flow reserve. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:1230–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kaufmann PA, Gnecchi-Ruscone T, Yap JT, Rimoldi O, Camici PG. Assessment of the reproducibility of baseline and hyperemic myocardial blood flow measurements with 15O-labeled water and PET. J Nucl Med. 1999;40:1848–56.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams K, Guo A, Renaud JM, Chow BJ, Klein R, Ruddy TD, Aung M, Garrard L, Beanlands RS. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease? J Nucl Cardiol. 2012;19:670.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Naya M, Murthy VL, Taqueti VR, Foster CR, Klein J, Garber M, Dorbala S, Hainer J, Blankstein R, Resnic F, Di Carli MF. Preserved coronary flow reserve effectively excludes high-risk coronary artery disease on angiography. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Bravo PE, Bergmark BA, Vita T, Taqueti VR, Gupta A, Seidelmann S, Christensen TE, Osborne MT, Shah NR, Ghosh N, Hainer J, Bibbo CF, Harrington M, Costantino F, Mehra MR, Dorbala S, Blankstein R, Desai A, Stevenson L, Givertz MM, Di Carli MF. Diagnostic and prognostic value of myocardial blood flow quantification as non-invasive indicator of cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:316–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Lee JM, Kim CH, Koo BK, Hwang D, Park J, Zhang J, Tong Y, Jeon KH, Bang JI, Suh M, Paeng JC, Cheon GJ, Na SH, Ahn JM, Park SJ, Kim HS. Integrated myocardial perfusion imaging diagnostics improve detection of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis by 13N-ammonia positron emission tomography. Circ Cardiovasc imaging. 2016;9:e004768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Danad I, Uusitalo V, Kero T, Saraste A, Raijmakers PG, Lammertsma AA, Heymans MW, Kajander SA, Pietila M, James S, Sorensen J, Knaapen P, Knuuti J. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64:1464–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. van de Hoef TP, Siebes M, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Fundamentals in clinical coronary physiology: why coronary flow is more important than coronary pressure. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:3312-9a.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gould KL, Johnson NP, Bateman TM, Beanlands RS, Bengel FM, Bober R, Camici PG, Cerqueira MD, Chow BJW, Di Carli MF, Dorbala S, Gewirtz H, Gropler RJ, Kaufmann PA, Knaapen P, Knuuti J, Merhige ME, Rentrop KP, Ruddy TD, Schelbert HR, Schindler TH, Schwaiger M, Sdringola S, Vitarello J, Williams KA Sr, Gordon D, Dilsizian V, Narula J. Anatomic versus physiologic assessment of coronary artery disease. Role of coronary flow reserve, fractional flow reserve, and positron emission tomography imaging in revascularization decision-making. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62:1639–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Johnson NP, Gould KL. Integrating noninvasive absolute flow, coronary flow reserve, and ischemic thresholds into a comprehensive map of physiological severity. J Am Coll Cardiol Img. 2012;5:430–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Tonino PA, De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Siebert U, Ikeno F, Van’t Veer M, Klauss V, Manoharan G, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Ver Lee PN, MacCarthy PA, Fearon WF, Investigators FS. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:213–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pijls NH, van Schaardenburgh P, Manoharan G, Boersma E, Bech JW, van’t Veer M, Bar F, Hoorntje J, Koolen J, Wijns W, de Bruyne B. Percutaneous coronary intervention of functionally nonsignificant stenosis: 5-year follow-up of the DEFER Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:2105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Kalesan B, Barbato E, Tonino PA, Piroth Z, Jagic N, Mobius-Winkler S, Rioufol G, Witt N, Kala P, MacCarthy P, Engstrom T, Oldroyd KG, Mavromatis K, Manoharan G, Verlee P, Frobert O, Curzen N, Johnson JB, Juni P, Fearon WF, Investigators FT. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2012;367:991–1001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Yilmaz A, Sechtem U. Angina pectoris in patients with normal coronary angiograms: current pathophysiological concepts and therapeutic options. Heart. 2012;98:1020–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Corcoran D, Hennigan B, Berry C. Fractional flow reserve: a clinical perspective. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;33:961–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, de Winter RJ, Koch KT, Dijksman LM, van den Berg AJ, Tijssen JG, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. The prognostic value of combined intracoronary pressure and blood flow velocity measurements after deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008;71:291–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. van de Hoef TP, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Delewi R, Piek MA, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Henriques JP, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Siebes M, Tijssen JG, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Physiological basis and long-term clinical outcome of discordance between fractional flow reserve and coronary flow velocity reserve in coronary stenoses of intermediate severity. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:301–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. van de Hoef TP, Nolte F, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Damman P, Chamuleau SA, Voskuil M, Verberne HJ, Henriques JP, van Eck-Smit BL, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Spaan JA, Siebes M, Tijssen JG, Meuwissen M, Piek JJ. Impact of hyperaemic microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve measurements in patients with stable coronary artery disease: insights from combined stenosis and microvascular resistance assessment. Heart. 2014;100:951–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, Schotborgh CE, Koch KT, de Winter RJ, Bax M, de Jong A, Spaan JA, Piek JJ. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001;103:184–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Garcia D, Harbaoui B, van de Hoef TP, Meuwissen M, Nijjer SS, Echavarria-Pinto M, Davies JE, Piek JJ, Lantelme P. Relationship between FFR, CFR and coronary microvascular resistance - practical implications for FFR-guided percutaneous coronary intervention. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0208612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. van de Hoef TP, Echavarria-Pinto M, van Lavieren MA, Meuwissen M, Serruys PW, Tijssen JG, Pocock SJ, Escaned J, Piek JJ. Diagnostic and prognostic implications of coronary flow capacity: a comprehensive cross-modality physiological concept in ischemic heart disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1670–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Camici PG, d’Amati G, Rimoldi O. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: mechanisms and functional assessment. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2015;12:48–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Neglia D, Michelassi C, Trivieri MG, Sambuceti G, Giorgetti A, Pratali L, Gallopin M, Salvadori P, Sorace O, Carpeggiani C, Poddighe R, L’Abbate A, Parodi O. Prognostic role of myocardial blood flow impairment in idiopathic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 2002;105:186–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Tio RA, Dabeshlim A, Siebelink HM, de Sutter J, Hillege HL, Zeebregts CJ, Dierckx RA, van Veldhuisen DJ, Zijlstra F, Slart RH. Comparison between the prognostic value of left ventricular function and myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with ischemic heart disease. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Murthy VL, Naya M, Foster CR, Hainer J, Gaber M, Di Carli G, Blankstein R, Dorbala S, Sitek A, Pencina MJ, Di Carli MF. Improved cardiac risk assessment with noninvasive measures of coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2011;124:2215–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Herzog BA, Husmann L, Valenta I, Gaemperli O, Siegrist PT, Tay FM, Burkhard N, Wyss CA, Kaufmann PA. Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Fukushima K, Javadi MS, Higuchi T, Lautamaki R, Merrill J, Nekolla SG, Bengel FM. Prediction of short-term cardiovascular events using quantification of global myocardial flow reserve in patients referred for clinical 82Rb PET perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:726–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Ziadi MC, Dekemp RA, Williams KA, Guo A, Chow BJ, Renaud JM, Ruddy TD, Sarveswaran N, Tee RE, Beanlands RS. Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58:740–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Gupta A, Taqueti VR, van de Hoef TP, Bajaj NS, Bravo PE, Murthy VL, Osborne MT, Seidelmann SB, Vita T, Bibbo CF, Harrington M, Hainer J, Rimoldi O, Dorbala S, Bhatt DL, Blankstein R, Camici PG, Di Carli MF. Integrated noninvasive physiological assessment of coronary circulatory function and impact on cardiovascular mortality in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2017;136:2325–36.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. Patel KK, Spertus JA, Chan PS, Sperry BW, Al Badarin F, Kennedy KF, Thompson RC, Case JA, McGhie AI, Bateman TM. Myocardial blood flow reserve assessed by positron emission tomography myocardial perfusion imaging identifies patients with a survival benefit from early revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:759–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Green R, Cantoni V, Acampa W, Assante R, Zampella E, Nappi C, Gaudieri V, Mannarino T, Cuocolo R, Petretta M, Cuocolo A. Prognostic value of coronary flow reserve in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease referred to PET myocardial perfusion imaging: a meta-analysis. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28:904.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Divisions of Nuclear Medicine and Cardiology, Departments of Radiology and Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA

    Chaitanya S. Rojulpote & Paco E. Bravo

Authors
  1. Chaitanya S. Rojulpote
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paco E. Bravo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paco E. Bravo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

    Stephan G. Nekolla

  2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Christoph Rischpler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rojulpote, C.S., Bravo, P.E. (2022). Myocardial Blood Flow Quantification with PET/CT: Applications. In: Nekolla, S.G., Rischpler, C. (eds) Hybrid Cardiac Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83167-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-83167-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-83166-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-83167-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation