Skip to main content

Prostate Artery Embolization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transradial Access in Interventional Radiology

Abstract

Over the past decade, prostate artery embolization (PAE) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment option for patients suffering from lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Literature over that time has moved from discussion of technique and technical feasibility of the procedure to comparisons of PAE with traditional surgical therapies such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). In most studies of patients undergoing PAE, transfemoral arterial access was obtained to catheterize the prostatic arteries. More recently, the use of transradial access to perform PAE has been described. While technically challenging, the transradial technique offers several potential advantages in appropriately selected patients, which may improve the benefit-risk profile of PAE and improve patient satisfaction. We describe the history and applications of PAE, list the equipment needed to perform PAE, review the procedural steps and technical considerations, and provide a case example, all in the context of transradial access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Egan KB. The epidemiology of benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms: prevalence and incident rates. Urol Clin North Am. 2016;43(3):289–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mitchell ME, Waltman AC, Athanasoulis CA, Kerr WS, Dretler SP. Control of massive prostatic bleeding with angiographic techniques. J Urol. 1976;115(6):692–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bischoff W, Goerttler U. Successful intra-arterial embolization of bleeding carcinoma of the prostate (author’s transl). Urologe A. 1977;16(2):99–102.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Appleton DS, Sibley GN, Doyle PT. Internal iliac artery embolisation for the control of severe bladder and prostate haemorrhage. Br J Urol. 1988;61(1):45–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Li BC. Internal iliac artery embolization for the control of severe bladder and prostate haemorrhage. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 1990;28(4):220–1, 253.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DeMeritt JS, Elmasri FF, Esposito MP, Rosenberg GS. Relief of benign prostatic hyperplasia-related bladder outlet obstruction after transarterial polyvinyl alcohol prostate embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11(6):767–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carnevale FC, Antunes AA, da Motta Leal Filho JM, de Oliveira Cerri LM, Baroni RH, Marcelino AS, et al. Prostatic artery embolization as a primary treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia: preliminary results in two patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(2):355–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel TV, Yu H, Isaacson AJ. Preclinical and clinical evidence for prostate artery embolization. In: Isaacson AJ, Bagla S, Raynor MC, Yu H, editors. Prostate artery embolization. Cham: Springer Nature; 2019. p. 71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isaacson AJ, Fischman AM, Burke CT. Technical feasibility of prostatic artery embolization from a transradial approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206(2):442–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhatia S, Harward SH, Sinha VK, Narayanan G. Prostate artery embolization via transradial or transulnar versus transfemoral arterial access: technical results. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(6):898–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu LB, Cedillo MA, Bishay V, Ranade M, Patel RS, Kim E, et al. Patient experience and preference in transradial versus transfemoral access during transarterial radioembolization: a randomized single-center trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(3):414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yamada R, Bracewell S, Bassaco B, Camacho J, Anderson MB, Conrad A, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral arterial access in liver cancer embolization: randomized trial to assess patient satisfaction. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(1):38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iezzi R, Pompili M, Posa A, Annicchiarico E, Garcovich M, Merlino B, et al. Transradial versus transfemoral access for hepatic chemoembolization: intrapatient prospective single-center study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(9):1234–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabró P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, et al. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015;385(9986):2465–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mamas MA, Tosh J, Hulme W, Hoskins N, Bungey G, Ludman P, et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in England during changes in practice: insights from the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(5):e004482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. McWilliams JP, Bilhim TA, Carnevale FC, Bhatia S, Isaacson AJ, Bagla S, et al. Society of interventional radiology multisociety consensus position statement on prostatic artery embolization for treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: from the Society of Interventional Radiology, the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, Société Française de Radiologie, and the British Society of Interventional Radiology: endorsed by the Asia Pacific Society of Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology, Canadian Association for Interventional Radiology, Chinese College of Interventionalists, Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia, Japanese Society of Interventional Radiology, and Korean Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(5):627–37.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhatia S, Sinha VK, Kava BR, Gomez C, Harward S, Punnen S, et al. Efficacy of prostatic artery embolization for catheter-dependent patients with large prostate sizes and high comorbidity scores. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(1):78–84.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bhatia S, Sinha VK, Harward S, Gomez C, Kava BR, Parekh DJ. Prostate artery embolization in patients with prostate volumes of 80 mL or more: a single-institution retrospective experience of 93 patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(10):1392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang MQ, Guo LP, Zhang GD, Yuan K, Li K, Duan F, et al. Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to large (>80 mL) benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of midterm follow-up from Chinese population. BMC Urol. 2015;15:33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurbatov D, Russo GI, Lepetukhin A, Dubsky S, Sitkin I, Morgia G, et al. Prostatic artery embolization for prostate volume greater than 80 cm3: results from a single-center prospective study. Urology. 2014;84(2):400–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang JL, Wang MQ, Duan F, Yuan B. A comparative study of prostatic artery embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia with different prostatic volume. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2019;99(31):2435–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mathevosian S, Plotnik AN, McWilliams JP. Prostate artery embolization for giant prostatic enlargement: short-term efficacy and safety. J Vasc Interv Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.06.021.

  23. Rastinehad AR, Caplin DM, Ost MC, VanderBrink BA, Lobko I, Badlani GH, et al. Selective arterial prostatic embolization (SAPE) for refractory hematuria of prostatic origin. Urology. 2008;71(2):181–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pereira K, Halpern JA, McClure TD, Lewis NA, Kably I, Bhatia S, et al. Role of prostate artery embolization in the management of refractory haematuria of prostatic origin. BJU Int. 2016;118(3):359–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Geevarghese R, Harding J, Parsons N, Hutchinson C, Parsons C. The relationship of embolic particle size to patient outcomes in prostate artery embolisation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-regression. Clin Radiol. 2020;75(5):366–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. de Assis AM, Moreira AM, de Paula Rodrigues VC, Harward SH, Antunes AA, Srougi M, et al. Pelvic arterial anatomy relevant to prostatic artery embolisation and proposal for angiographic classification. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(4):855–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maclean D, Maher B, Harris M, Dyer J, Modi S, Hacking N, et al. Planning prostate artery embolisation: is it essential to perform a pre-procedural CTA. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2018;41(4):628–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Schott P, Katoh M, Fischer N, Freyhardt P. Radiation dose in prostatic artery embolization using cone-beam CT and 3D roadmap software. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(9):1452–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bilhim T, Tinto HR, Fernandes L, Martins Pisco J. Radiological anatomy of prostatic arteries. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;15(4):276–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bilhim T, Pisco JM, Rio Tinto H, Fernandes L, Pinheiro LC, Furtado A, et al. Prostatic arterial supply: anatomic and imaging findings relevant for selective arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23(11):1403–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bagla S, Rholl KS, Sterling KM, van Breda A, Papadouris D, Cooper JM, et al. Utility of cone-beam CT imaging in prostatic artery embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(11):1603–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bhatia S, Sinha V, Bordegaray M, Kably I, Harward S, Narayanan G. Role of coil embolization during prostatic artery embolization: incidence, indications, and safety profile. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(5):656–64.e3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yu SCH, Cho C, Hung E, Wang D, Chiu P, Yee CH, et al. Case-control study of intra-arterial verapamil for intraprostatic anastomoses to extraprostatic arteries in prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hypertrophy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28(8):1167–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ayyagari R, Powell T, Staib L, Chapiro J, Schoenberger S, Devito R, et al. Case-control comparison of conventional end-hole versus balloon-occlusion microcatheter prostatic artery embolization for treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(9):1459–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Bilhim T, Costa NV, Torres D, Pisco J, Carmo S, Oliveira AG. Randomized clinical trial of balloon-occlusion versus conventional microcatheter prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Vasc Interv Radiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.06.019.

  36. Torres D, Costa NV, Pisco J, Pinheiro LC, Oliveira AG, Bilhim T. Prostatic artery embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia: prospective randomized trial of 100-300 μm versus 300-500 μm versus 100- to 300-μm + 300- to 500-μm embospheres. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;30(5):638–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bilhim T, Pisco J, Campos Pinheiro L, Rio Tinto H, Fernandes L, Pereira JA, et al. Does polyvinyl alcohol particle size change the outcome of prostatic arterial embolization for benign prostatic hyperplasia? Results from a single-center randomized prospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(11):1595–602.e1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Franiel T, Aschenbach R, Trupp S, Lehmann T, von Rundstedt FC, Grimm MO, et al. Prostatic artery embolization with 250-μm spherical polyzene-coated hydrogel microspheres for lower urinary tract symptoms with follow-up MR imaging. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(8):1127–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Moreira AM, de Assis AM, Carnevale FC, Antunes AA, Srougi M, Cerri GGA. Review of adverse events related to prostatic artery embolization for treatment of bladder outlet obstruction due to BPH. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(10):1490–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mouli S, Hohlastos E, Salem R. Prostate artery embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol. 2019;36(2):142–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Carnevale FC, Moreira AM, de Assis AM, Antunes AA, Cristina de Paula Rodrigues V, Srougi M, et al. Prostatic artery embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia: 10 years’ experience. Radiology. 2020;296(2):444–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jason Gruener .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gruener, J., Rastinehad, A.R. (2022). Prostate Artery Embolization. In: Fischman, A.M., Patel, R.S., Lookstein, R.A. (eds) Transradial Access in Interventional Radiology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81678-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81678-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81677-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81678-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics