Skip to main content

Quantitative Analysis Methods of Clustering Techniques

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clustering Techniques for Image Segmentation

Abstract

The hard and soft clustering techniques have membership functions. The chief objective of these functions is converging the final solution at the optimum global location. This chapter discusses the existing quantitative analysis methods to demonstrate the segmentation performance of clustering techniques. In the earliest quantitative analysis methods of clustering techniques, the MSE (mean square error), inter-cluster variation, and VXB function have generally been using that measure the local cluster similarity only. As compared to the former quantitative analysis methods, the three modern methods measure the local cluster similarity and the global homogeneity of segmented images without any human interaction or predefined threshold settings. This chapter discusses the working and the practical knowledge of the existing evaluation methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Borsotti, M., Campadelli, P., & Schettini, R. (1998). Quantitative evaluation of color image segmentation results. Pattern Recognition Letters, 19(8), 741–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, J., & Yang, Y.-H. (1994). Multiresolution color image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 16(7), 689–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D., Fowlkes, C., Tal, D., & Malik, J. (2001, July). A database of human segmented natural images and its application to evaluating segmentation algorithms and measuring ecological statistics. In Proceedings Eighth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. ICCV 2001 (Vol. 2, pp. 416–423). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakhira, M. K., Bandyopadhyay, S., & Maulik, U. (2004). Validity index for crisp and fuzzy clusters. Pattern Recognition, 37(3), 487–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddiqui, F. U. (2012). Enhanced clustering algorithms for gray-scale image segmentation. Master dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xie, X. L., & Beni, G. (1991). A validity measure for fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(8), 841–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Siddiqui, F.U., Yahya, A. (2022). Quantitative Analysis Methods of Clustering Techniques. In: Clustering Techniques for Image Segmentation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81230-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-81230-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-81229-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-81230-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics