Skip to main content

Online Education as an Indicator of Effective Public Administration of Higher Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”

Abstract

The relevance of this article is determined by two social processes related to the institutionalization of online education in the higher education system of the Russian Federation. The first is that the total number of students studying in electronic format is steadily increasing. The second one is manifested in the state's desire to use online education as an indicator that evaluates the effectiveness of public administration in the field of educational policy. The author hypothesizes that online education cannot be an indicator of the effectiveness of public administration, since the ill-considered implementation of this form of educational process will inevitably lead to a decrease in the quality of student education and a systemic deterioration in the training of specialists. To substantiate this hypothesis, an empirical study was conducted using the group interview method in student groups. The analysis of the obtained data fully confirmed this hypothesis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tyukavkin NM (2015) Systematization of the theoretical foundations of neo-institutionalism. Bull Samara State Univ Ser “Econ Manage” 9/1(131):209–216

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moskovskiy AV (2005) Limits of institutionalism. Economist 6:74–81

    Google Scholar 

  3. Demsetz H (1988) Efficiency, competition, and policy. Oxford, pp 164–184

    Google Scholar 

  4. Durkheim E (1991) On the division of social labor. Science, Moscow, p 595

    Google Scholar 

  5. Parsons T (2002) On social systems. Akadem-Project, Moscow, p 534

    Google Scholar 

  6. Weber M (1990) On some categories of understanding sociology. Selected works. Progress Publ, Moscow, pp 494–546

    Google Scholar 

  7. Coleman JS (1993) The role of rights in a theory of social action. J Inst Theor Econ 149:213–232

    Google Scholar 

  8. Miroshnikov SN (2018) The Essence and content of the concepts of “public administration” and “development management” in modern conditions. Prospect Sci 9:40–44

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gnatyuk MA (2019) Methodological aspect of inertia research. Bull Modern Res 1.6(28):68–74

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grachev NI (2017) The Essence of the state. Bull Saratov State Law Acad 4:11–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Vaskov MA, Kovalev VV, Gafiatulina NKh (2020) Online education in the higher school of Russia: the main actors of institutionalization and social consequences 9(3):45–57

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kovalev VV, Kasyanov VV, Manucharyan AK (2020) Online education in higher education in Russia: a factor of destruction or a source of development? Hum South Russia 9(3):2–91

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kovalev VV, Dyatlov AV, Vodenko KV (2020) Assessment of the quality of online education (based on focused interviews in student groups). Bull South Russian State Univ (Novocherkassk Polytechnic Institute) 13(3):6–14

    Google Scholar 

  14. Polonsky VM (1995) Dictionary of concepts and terms on the legislation of the Russian Federation on education. Moscow Institute of Educational Systems Development, pp 231–232

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kachalov V, Prudkovsky B (1999) About the assessment of the quality of higher education. High Educ Russia 2:54–58

    Google Scholar 

  16. Andreev AA, Soldatkin VI (2002) Applied philosophy of open quality: a pedagogical aspect. Alfa Publisher, Moscow, p 234

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pavlenko KV (2010) Neoinstitutional approach to assessing the quality of education in higher education. J Sociol Soc Anthropol 13(1):90–100

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ushakov BG (2008) The quality of education and/or education quality (problems of methodology, practice and evaluation). Manage Consult 3:149–161

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zaborova EN, Shchipacheva (2004) Quality of education in the higher school system: the experience of sociological analysis. News of Ural State University of Economy 9:78

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karasik LV (2019) The concept and principles of implementing public administration functions. Acad J 10:126–129

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anistratenko, T., Bersyrov, T., Dyatlov, A. (2022). Online Education as an Indicator of Effective Public Administration of Higher Education. In: Beskopylny, A., Shamtsyan, M. (eds) XIV International Scientific Conference “INTERAGROMASH 2021”. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 247. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80946-1_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80945-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80946-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics