Skip to main content

Imaging Considerations for Laryngeal Cancer Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Head and Neck Imaging

Abstract

Assessment in laryngeal cancer involves a multi-disciplinary team approach requiring clinico-radiological correlation. Clinical endoscopic assessment remains the gold standard approach for early mucosal disease with radiological assessment largely reserved for stage 2 disease and above. Utilisation of an appropriate imaging modality warrants an understanding of their benefits and potential pitfalls, particularly pertaining to CT, MRI and functional imaging. This must also be correlated with the patient’s history, the most suitable modality chosen based on the clinical question (staging, response evaluation or recurrence).

This chapter provides a detailed review of the clinically relevant laryngeal anatomy and the role of imaging in differentiating normal radiological appearances from disease, including the challenges of assessing laryngeal cartilage invasion, nodal disease and distant metastases. In addition, the surgical management of laryngeal cancer is explored, highlighting current best practice and recent technological advances. The importance of the multi-disciplinary team is also emphasised in reference to its role in staging, decision to treat and subsequent disease monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wu JH, Luo XY. Application of narrow band imaging in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the larynx. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 7;52(12):900–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Klimza H, Jackowska J, Piazza C, Banaszewski J, Wierzbicka M. The role of intraoperative narrow-band imaging in transoral laser microsurgery for early and moderately advanced glottic cancer. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018 Mar 1;85(2):228–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Houtte E, Van Lierde K, D’Haeseleer E, Claeys S. The prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population with dysphonia. Laryngoscope. Wiley-Blackwell. 2010 Feb;120(2):306–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tatla T. Dysplastic lesions of the larynx. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2015. p. 157–68.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mehanna H, Paleri V, West CML, Nutting C. Head and neck cancer-part 1: epidemiology, presentation, and preservation. Clin Otolaryngol. 2011 Feb;36(1):65–68. Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fakhry C, Krapcho M, Eisele DW, D’Souza G. Head and neck squamous cell cancers in the United States are rare and the risk now is higher among white individuals compared with black individuals. Cancer. 2018 May 15;124(10):2125–2133. Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  7. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene F, Byrd DR, Brookland RK, Washington MK, et al. AJCC cancer staging manual. Springer international publishing. 2017;XVII:1032.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doescher J, Veit JA, Hoffmann TK. The 8th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: Updates in otorhinolaryngology, head and neck surgery. KNO. 2017 Dec;65(12):1032. Springer Medizin

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wu JH, Luo XY. Application of narrow band imaging in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the larynx. Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Dec 7;52(12):900–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Piazza C, Del Bon F, Peretti G, Nicolai P. Narrow band imaging in endoscopic evaluation of the larynx. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Dec;20(6):472–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tatla T, Podoleanu AG, Elson DS. In: Sudhoff H, Bhutta MF, editors. Optical diagnostics in head and neck cancer. 9th ed. London: UCLH Head and Neck Centre; 2015. p. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shang D-S, Ruan L-X, Zhou S-H, Bao Y-Y, Cheng K-J, Wang Q-Y. Differentiating laryngeal carcinomas from precursor lesions by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T: a preliminary study. Public Library Sci. 2013;8(7):e68622.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wippold FJ. Head and neck imaging: the role of CT and MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging Wiley-Blackwell. 2007 Mar;25(3):453–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Connor S. Laryngeal cancer: how does the radiologist help? Cancer Imaging BioMed Central. 2007 May 28;7(1):93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu J-H, Zhao J, Li Z-H, Yang W-Q, Liu Q-H, Yang Z-Y, et al. Comparison of CT and MRI in diagnosis of laryngeal carcinoma with anterior vocal commissure involvement. Sci Rep Nature Publishing Group. 2016 Aug 2;6(1):30353.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Allegra E, Ferrise P, Trapasso S, Trapuzzano O, Barca A, Tamburrini S, et al. Early glottic cancer: role of MRI in the preoperative staging. Biomed Res Int Hindawi. 2014;2014(27):890385–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Agnello F, Cupido F, Sparacia G, Midiri F, Miroddi M, Grassedonio E, et al. Computerised tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a practical approach. Neuroradiol J. 2017 Jun;30(3):197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivière D, Mancini J, Santini L, Giovanni A, Dessi P, Fakhry N. Lymph-node metastasis following total laryngectomy and total pharyngolaryngectomy for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: frequency, distribution and risk factors. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis. 2017 Dec 22;135(3):163–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liao L-J, Lo W-C, Hsu W-L, Wang C-T, Lai M-S. Detection of cervical lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancer patients with clinically N0 neck-a meta-analysis comparing different imaging modalities. BMC Cancer BioMed Central. 2012 Jun 12;12(1):236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon DY, Hwang HS, Chang SK, Rho Y-S, Ahn HY, Kim JH, et al. CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):634–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoang JK, Vanka J, Ludwig BJ, Glastonbury CM. Evaluation of cervical lymph nodes in head and neck cancer with CT and MRI: tips, traps, and a systematic approach. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jan;200(1):W17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. de Bree R, Senft A, Coca-Pelaz A, Kowalski L, Lopez F, Mendenhall W, et al. Detection of distant metastases in head and neck Cancer: changing landscape. Adv Ther Springer Healthcare. 2018 Feb;35(2):161–72.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Takes RP, Rinaldo A, Silver CE, Haigentz M, Woolgar JA, Triantafyllou A, et al. Distant metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Part I Basic aspects Oral Oncol. 2012 Sep;48(9):775–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rohde M, Nielsen AL, Johansen J, Sørensen JA, Nguyen N, Diaz A, et al. Head-to-head comparison of chest X-Ray/head and neck MRI, Chest CT/Head and Neck MRI, and 18F-FDG PET/CT for detection of distant metastases and synchronous cancer in oral, pharyngeal, and laryngeal cancer. J Nucl Med. Society of Nuclear Medicine. 2017 Dec;58(12):1919–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu G-Z, Guan D-J, He Z-Y. (18)FDG-PET/CT for detecting distant metastases and second primary cancers in patients with head and neck cancer. A meta-analysis. Oral Oncol. 2011 Jul;47(7):560–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract: assessment and management in people aged 16 and over. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (UK); 2016 Feb.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Castaldi P, Leccisotti L, Bussu F, Miccichè F, Rufini V. Role of (18)F-FDG PET-CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital Pacini Editore. 2013 Feb;33(1):1–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Warner L, Chudasama J, Kelly CG, Loughran S, McKenzie K, Wight R, et al. Radiotherapy versus open surgery versus endolaryngeal surgery (with or without laser) for early laryngeal squamous cell cancer. Cochrane ENT Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 12;3(12):CD002027. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fink DS, Sibley H, Kunduk M, Schexnaildre M, Kakade A, Sutton C, et al. Subjective and objective voice outcomes after transoral laser microsurgery for early glottic cancer. Wiley-Blackwell. 2016 Feb;126(2):405–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sjögren EV. Transoral laser microsurgery in early Glottic lesions. Curr Otorhinolaryngol Rep.; Springer US. 2017;5(1):56–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Steiner W, Vogt P, Ambrosch P, Kron M. Transoral carbon dioxide laser microsurgery for recurrent glottic carcinoma after radiotherapy. Head Neck. 2004 Jun;26(6):477–484. Wiley-Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  32. Piazza C, Peretti G, Cattaneo A, Garrubba F, De Zinis LOR, Nicolai P. Salvage surgery after radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer: from endoscopic resections to open-neck partial and total laryngectomies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. American Medical Association. 2007 Oct;133(10):1037–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Remacle M, Arens C, Eldin MB, Campos G, Estomba CC, Dulguerov P, et al. Laser-assisted surgery of the upper aero-digestive tract: a clarification of nomenclature. A consensus statement of the European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2017 Oct;274(10):3723–3727. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  34. Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friedrich G, et al. Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the working committee, European laryngological society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000;257(4):227–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Remacle M, Van Haverbeke C, Eckel H, Bradley P, Chevalier D, Djukic V, et al. Proposal for revision of the European laryngological society classification of endoscopic cordectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2007 May;264(5):499–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taranjit Singh Tatla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tatla, T.S., Kumar, R., Fiorini, F., Weller, A. (2021). Imaging Considerations for Laryngeal Cancer Surgery. In: Tatla, T.S., Manjaly, J., Kumar, R., Weller, A. (eds) Head and Neck Imaging. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80897-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80897-6_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80895-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80897-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics