Abstract
The shift from closed to open innovation is the major cultural evolution underlying the transition from industrial to knowledge societies. Cities have become associated with volatile economies, dense nodes of information and knowledge and social networks, globalised markets, cosmopolitanism, competitive higher education institutions, creativity and vibrancy, but also with issues like social polarisation and social diversity as these dynamics produce growing inequalities within the cityscape. City governments alone cannot tackle these challenges effectively and in economically sustainable ways. Novel solutions are thus required if our cities are to have any hope of a more sustainable and resilient future.
Economic growth is increasingly being driven by cities and institutions. Cities, not nation states, will determine our future survival and therefore, how cities and citizens participate in public value dialogue is crucial. As citizens and residents become problem-solvers, co-designers and co-producers of public services, the economy should be understood from a broader perspective than just efficiency and effectiveness to also include the dimensions of public values.
Economic development and the activities of the collaborative knowledge society differ fundamentally from those of the industrial period. This change can also be seen in a public values context. Moreover, this is fundamental not only to addressing the social and economic needs of the cities, but also when contributing economically effective and sustainable approaches to cities in the future.
Some industrial cities have already undergone a period of economic restructuring. The fate of these cities has been the consequence of the forces of ‘creative destruction’, melding social capital, technology, information flows, creativity, inclusiveness and the public values backing and supporting them. Success in this new environment is however widely differentiated.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2012). Why nations fail. The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. The Crown Publishing Group. Random House Inc.
Airaksinen, J. (2018). Kestävä tulevaisuus kasvaa kaupunkien itsehallinnon voimasta. In Inga Nyholm (Ed.), Kaupunkien aikakausi – Kaupunkitutkijoiden puheenvuoroja 2020-luvun kaupunkipolitiikasta, Helsingin kaupungin keskushallinnon julkaisuja, 11, 8–11.
Buntz, B. (2016). Why Chicago is a Smart City King. The Windy City benefits from both strong local support and the unique infrastructure of the entire Midwest region. IOT World Today, 4th May 2016.
Chang, H. J. (2014). Economics. The User’s Guide. Pelican.
Florida, R. (1995). Toward the learning region. Futures, 27(5), 527–536.
Florida, R. (2003). Cities and the creative class. City & Community, 2(1), 3–19.
Florida, R. (2006). The flight of the creative class: The new global competition for talent. Liberal Education, 92(3), 22–29.
Gordon, R. J. (2016). The rise and fall of American growth. Princeton University Press.
Hahnel, R., & Wright, E. O. (2016). Alternatives to capitalism. Verso.
Harvey, D. (2016). The right to the city. In Richard T. LeGates and Frederic Stout (Eds.), The City Reader Sixth Edition, 272–278. Routledge.
Hort, S., & Therborn, G. (2012). Citizenship and welfare: Politics and social policies. The Wiley-Blackwell companion to political sociology, 360–371.
Häikiö, L. (2018). Parasta kaupunkipolitiikkaa on sosiaalisesti kestävän kaupunkikehityksen edistäminen. In Inga Nyholm (Ed.) Kaupunkien aikakausi – Kaupunkitutkijoiden pu-heenvuoroja 2020-luvun kaupunkipolitiikasta, Helsingin kaupungin keskushallinnon julkaisu-ja, 11, 26–29.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of Great American Cities. Random House.
Jacobs, J. (1969). Economy of cities. Random House.
Joss, S. (2015). Sustainable cities. Governing for Urban Innovation. Palgrave.
Julkunen, R. (2017). Muuttuvat hyvinvointivaltiot. Eurooppalaiset hyvinvointivaltiot reformoi-tavina. SoPhi. Jyväskylän yliopisto. Jyväskylä.
Khanna, P. (2016). Connectography: Mapping the future of global civilization. Random House.
Kivistö, S., Pihlström, S., & Tolonen, K. (2016). Onko kaikki kaupan. In teoksessa Kivis-tö, Pihlström, Tolonen (Eds.), Talous ja Moraali. Gaudeamus, 6–19. Helsinki University Press.
Kocka, J. (2016). Kapitalismin lyhyt historia. Gaudeamus.
Korkman, S. (2016). Moraalin merkitys taloudelle. In teoksessa Kivistö, Pihlström, To-lonen (Eds.), Talous ja Moraali. Gaudeamus, 20–38. Helsinki University Press.
Laakso, S., Loikkanen, H. A., Lönnqvist, H. (2002). Oppihistoriallinen katsaus kaupunki-taloustieteeseen. Kansantaloudellinen aikakauskirja, 98(4), 394–408. Helsingin yliopisto.
Laine, M. (2018). Kaupunkilaisten aika. In Inga Nyholm (Ed.), Kaupunkien aikakausi – Kaupunkitutkijoiden puheenvuoroja 2020-luvun kaupunkipolitiikasta, Helsingin kaupungin keskushallinnon julkaisuja 11, 44–47.
Laitinen, I. (2012). Moraalinen logo. Organisaatioiden arvovallankumous. Talentum.
Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Local public service productivity and performance measurement. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 9(1), 49–75.
Laitinen, I., Kinder, T., & Stenvall, J. (2018). Street-level new public governances in integrated services-as-a-system. Public Management Review, 20(6), 845–872.
Le Galès, P. (2002). European cities. Oxford University Press.
Le Galès, P. (2016). Neoliberalism and urban change: Stretching a Good Idea Too Far?, 154–172. Territory, Politics, Governance, 4, 2.
Lillrank, P. (2016). Köyhät ja kapitalismi. In teoksessa Kivistö, Pihlström, Tolonen (Eds.), Talous ja Moraali. Gaudeamus, 39–56. Helsinki University Press.
Niall, F. (2014). The great degeneration: How institutions decay and economies die. Penguin.
Niemelä, J. (2018). Kestävän kehityksen kaupunkipolitiikka. In Inga Nyholm (Ed.), Kaupunkien aikakausi – Kaupunkitutkijoiden puheenvuoroja 2020-luvun kaupunkipolitiikasta, Helsingin kaupungin keskushallinnon julkaisuja 11, 64–67.
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political science & politics, 28(4), 664–683.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Culture and politics (pp. 223–234). Palgrave Macmillan.
Sassen, S. (2016). The Impact of the New Technologies and Globalization on Cities. In Richard T. LeGates and Frederic Stout (Eds.), The City Reader Sixth Edition, 252–258. Routledge.
The City of Chicago Technology Plan. (2013). City of Chicago (94 p).
The City of Chicago Technology Plan. (2019). City of Chicago.
Therborn, G. (2000). Dimensions of globalisation and the dynamics of (in) equalities (pp. 33–48). Bringing Society Back In.
Therborn, G. (2017). Cities of power: The urban, the national, the popular, the global. Verso Books.
Teivainen, T. (2016). Ekonomismi ja demokratian tulevaisuus. In teoksessa Kivistö, Pihlström, Tolonen (Eds.), Talous ja Moraali. Gaudeamus, 91–105. Helsinki University Press.
Tuomala, M. (2019). Markkinat, valtio & eriarvoisuus, Vastapaino.
UN-Habitat, United Nations Human Settlements Programme. (2016). Key Findings and Messages. In Richard T. LeGates and Frederic Stout (Eds.), The City Reader Sixth Edition, 661–665. Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stenvall, J., Laitinen, I., Yeoman, R., Thompson, M., Mueller Santos, M. (2022). Economic Development Policy and Public Values. In: Public Values for Cities and City Policy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80799-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80799-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80798-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80799-3
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)