Skip to main content

HIV Testing and Prevention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
HIV Psychiatry

Abstract

Psychiatric illness is associated with increased likelihood of infection with HIV, and thus patients living with psychiatric illness represent a population that is particularly vulnerable to new HIV infection. Clinicians who work with patients with psychiatric illness and other patients at high risk for HIV have the opportunity and responsibility to intervene with screening, prevention, and other measures to reduce the burden of HIV-related illness in these patients. In this chapter, we review concepts in HIV prevention that are relevant to patients with psychiatric illness. We first discuss some of the core strategies in public health approaches to HIV prevention, including treatment as prevention (TasP), pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), and post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP.) We then review some of the factors that place psychiatrically ill people at particularly high risk for HIV. Finally, we discuss specific recommendations for assessment, testing, and providing PrEP and PEP to patients with psychiatric illness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Blank MB, Himelhoch S, Walkup J, Eisenberg MM. Treatment considerations for HIV-infected individuals with severe mental illness. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013;10(4):371–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Blank MB, Mandell DS, Aiken L, Hadley TR. Co-occurrence of HIV and serious mental illness among Medicaid recipients. Psychiatr Serv. 2002;53(7):868–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blank MB, Himelhoch SS, Balaji AB, Metzger DS, Dixon LB, Rose CE, et al. A multisite study of the prevalence of HIV with rapid testing in mental health settings. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(12):2377–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley MV, Remien RH, Dolezal C. Depression symptoms and sexual HIV risk behavior among serodiscordant couples. Psychosom Med. 2008;70(2):186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. LeGrand S, Reif S, Sullivan K, Murray K, Barlow ML, Whetten K. A review of recent literature on trauma among individuals living with HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(4):397–405.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Elkbuli A, Polcz V, Dowd B, McKenney M, Prado G. HIV prevention intervention for substance users: a review of the literature. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019;14(1):1.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Medicine Io. In: Auerbach JD, Wypijewska C, Brodie HK, editors. AIDS and behavior: an integrated approach. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 1994. p. 358.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Meade CS, Sikkema KJ. HIV risk behavior among adults with severe mental illness: a systematic review. Clin Psychol Rev. 2005;25(4):433–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Owczarzak J, Dickson-Gomez J. Provider perspectives on evidence-based HIV prevention interventions: barriers and facilitators to implementation. AIDS Patient Care STDs. 2011;25:171–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Rausch DM, Grossman CI, Erbelding EJ. Integrating behavioral and biomedical research in HIV interventions: challenges and opportunities. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013;63(Suppl 1):S6–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, Degen O, et al. Risk of HIV transmission through condomless sex in serodifferent gay couples with the HIV-positive partner taking suppressive antiretroviral therapy (PARTNER): final results of a multicentre, prospective, observational study. Lancet. 2019;393(10189):2428–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bavinton BR, Pinto AN, Phanuphak N, Grinsztejn B, Prestage GP, Zablotska-Manos IB, et al. Viral suppression and HIV transmission in serodiscordant male couples: an international, prospective, observational, cohort study. Lancet HIV. 2018;5(8):e438–e47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rodger AJ, Cambiano V, Bruun T, Vernazza P, Collins S, van Lunzen J, et al. Sexual activity without condoms and risk of HIV transmission in serodifferent couples when the HIV-positive partner is using suppressive antiretroviral therapy. JAMA. 2016;316(2):171–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 90-90-90: An ambitious treatment target to help end the AIDS epidemic: UNAIDS; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Stover J, Bollinger L, Izazola JA, Loures L, DeLay P, Ghys PD. What is required to end the AIDS epidemic as a public health threat by 2030? The cost and impact of the fast-track approach. PLoS One. 2016;11(5):e0154893.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter K, Gourlay A, Attawell K, Hales D, Supervie V, Touloumi G, et al. Substantial heterogeneity in progress toward reaching the 90-90-90 HIV target in the WHO European region. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2018;79(1):28–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Huerga H, Van Cutsem G, Ben Farhat J, Puren A, Bouhenia M, Wiesner L, et al. Progress towards the UNAIDS 90-90-90 goals by age and gender in a rural area of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: a household-based community cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):303.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Calabrese SK, Mayer KH. Providers should discuss U=U with all patients living with HIV. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(4):e211–e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. The LH. U=U taking off in 2017. Lancet HIV. 2017;4(11):e475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Riddell J, Amico KR, Mayer KH. HIV preexposure prophylaxis: a review. JAMA. 2018;319(12):1261–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HV infection in the United States – 2017 update 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/risk/prep/cdc-hiv-prep-guidelines-2017.pdf.

  22. Marcus JL, Katz KA, Krakower DS, Calabrese SK. Risk compensation and clinical decision making — the case of HIV preexposure prophylaxis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(6):510–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Remien RH, Higgins JA, Correale J, Bauermeister J, Dubrow R, Bradley M, et al. Lack of understanding of acute HIV infection among newly-infected persons-implications for prevention and public health: The NIMH Multisite Acute HIV Infection Study: II. AIDS Behav. 2009;13(6):1046–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Francis DP, Chin J. The prevention of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome in the United States. An objective strategy for medicine, public health, business, and the community. JAMA. 1987;257(10):1357–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Connor EM, Sperling RS, Gelber R, Kiselev P, Scott G, O’Sullivan MJ, et al. Reduction of maternal-infant transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 with zidovudine treatment. Pediatric AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol 076 Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(18):1173–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Owens DK, Davidson KW, Krist AH, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2203–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Volk JE, Marcus JL, Phengrasamy T, Blechinger D, Nguyen DP, Follansbee S, et al. No new hiv infections with increasing use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis in a clinical practice setting. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(10):1601–3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Pyra M, Anderson P, Haberer JE, Heffron R, Celum C, Asiimwe S, et al. Tenofovir-diphosphate as a marker of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use among east african men and women. Front Pharmacol. 2019;10:401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hare CB, Coll J, Ruane P, Molina J-M, Mayer KH, Jessen H, et al. The phase 3 discover study: daily F/TAF or F/TDF for HIV preexposure prophylaxis. Conference on retroviruses and opportunistic infections; March 4–7; Seattle, WA; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCormack S, Dunn DT, Desai M, Dolling DI, Gafos M, Gilson R, et al. Pre-exposure prophylaxis to prevent the acquisition of HIV-1 infection (PROUD): effectiveness results from the pilot phase of a pragmatic open-label randomised trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10013):53–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Molina JM, Capitant C, Spire B, Pialoux G, Cotte L, Charreau I, et al. On-demand preexposure prophylaxis in men at high risk for HIV-1 infection. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(23):2237–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marrazzo JM, Ramjee G, Richardson BA, Gomez K, Mgodi N, Nair G, et al. Tenofovir-based preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(6):509–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Choopanya K, Martin M, Suntharasamai P, Sangkum U, Mock PA, Leethochawalit M, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV infection in injecting drug users in Bangkok, Thailand (the Bangkok Tenofovir Study): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2013;381(9883):2083–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Van Damme L, Corneli A, Ahmed K, Agot K, Lombaard J, Kapiga S, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for HIV infection among African women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):411–22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Thigpen MC, Kebaabetswe PM, Paxton LA, Smith DK, Rose CE, Segolodi TM, et al. Antiretroviral preexposure prophylaxis for heterosexual HIV transmission in Botswana. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):423–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Baeten JM, Donnell D, Ndase P, Mugo NR, Campbell JD, Wangisi J, et al. Antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV prevention in heterosexual men and women. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(5):399–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Chou R, Evans C, Hoverman A, Sun C, Dana T, Bougatsos C, et al. Preexposure prophylaxis for the prevention of HIV infection: evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2019;321(22):2214–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pereira L, Goschin S, Ashley K. PrEP: a review for mental health professionals. J Gay Lesbian Mental Health. 2016;20(1):4–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Traeger MW, Schroeder SE, Wright EJ, Hellard ME, Cornelisse VJ, Doyle JS, et al. Effects of pre-exposure prophylaxis for the prevention of human immunodeficiency virus infection on sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67(5):676–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Remien RH, Stirratt MJ, Nguyen N, Robbins RN, Pala AN, Mellins CA. Mental health and HIV/AIDS: the need for an integrated response. AIDS. 2019;33(9):1411–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Defechereux PA, Mehrotra M, Liu AY, McMahan VM, Glidden DV, Mayer KH, et al. Depression and oral FTC/TDF pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) among men and transgender women who have sex with men (MSM/TGW). AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1478–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Gonzalez A, Mimiaga MJ, Israel J, Andres Bedoya C, Safren SA. Substance use predictors of poor medication adherence: the role of substance use coping among HIV-infected patients in opioid dependence treatment. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(1):168–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mehrotra ML, Glidden DV, McMahan V, Amico KR, Hosek S, Defechereux P, et al. The effect of depressive symptoms on adherence to daily oral PrEP in men who have sex with men and transgender women: a marginal structural model analysis of the iPrEx OLE study. AIDS Behav. 2016;20(7):1527–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Lanovitz RJ et al. HPTN083 interim result: pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) containing long-acting injectable cabotegravir (CAB-LA) is safe and highly effective for cisgender men and transgender men who have sex with men (MSM, TGW). AIDS 2020: Virtual; July 6–10, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Delany-Moretlwe S et al. Long-acting injectable cabotegravir is safe and effective in preventing HIV infection in cisgender women: interim results from HPTN 084. HIV research for prevention (HIVR4P) virtual conference 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Health resources and services administration 2016. Updated guidelines for antiretroviral postexposure prophylaxis after sexual, injection drug use, or other nonoccupational exposure to HIV—United States. 2016. Available from: https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/38856.

  47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Health Resources and Services Administration (CDC). Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP). Updated May 23, 2018. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/risk/pep/index.html.

  48. Centers for Disease Control. PEP HIV basics. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/hiv/basics/pep.html.

  49. Zash R, Makhema J, Shapiro RL. Neural-tube defects with dolutegravir treatment from the time of conception. N Engl J Med. 2018;379(10):979–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Dugdale CM, Ciaranello AL, Bekker LG, Stern ME, Myer L, Wood R, et al. Risks and benefits of dolutegravir- and efavirenz-based strategies for south african women with HIV of child-bearing potential: a modeling study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(9):614–25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Hoffman RM, Mofenson LM. Decision making in a time of uncertainty: dolutegravir for reproductive-age women. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(9):658–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark V. Bradley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Multiple-Choice Questions

Multiple-Choice Questions

  1. 1.

    Post-exposure prophylaxis differs from pre-exposure prophylaxis in which of the following ways? (Please choose one only.)

    1. (a)

      It is helpful in reducing HIV transmission.

    2. (b)

      It is recommended for an HIV-negative sexual partner of a person with HIV and needs to be taken on a daily basis for the duration of the relationship, or it is not consistently efficacious in preventing HIV transmission.

    3. (c)

      The duration of post-exposure prophylaxis is the same as that of pre-exposure prophylaxis.

    4. (d)

      Post-exposure prophylaxis is indicated emergently following an accidental exposure of an HIV-negative person to the blood or body fluid of an HIV-positive person during a sexual encounter or injection drug use.

    5. (e)

      Post-exposure prophylaxis is a response to a medical emergency and but is not comprised of treatment with antiretroviral medications.

      (Correct answer is d.)

  2. 2.

    Post-exposure prophylaxis or PEP is indicated for which of the following clinical presentations?

    1. (a)

      An HIV-negative man who is in a long-term monogamous relationship with an HIV-positive man experiences condom failure during receptive anal sex.

    2. (b)

      A person with opioid use disorder in remission experiences a relapse and shares needles during an instance of injection drug use.

    3. (c)

      An HIV-negative person who was drugged and awakened after a sexual encounter while intoxicated with no recollection of the encounter.

    4. (d)

      An HIV-negative, non-pregnant woman who is of childbearing age and is in a long-term relationship with an HIV-positive man realizes that her partner “forgot” to put on a condom during vaginal intercourse.

    5. (e)

      All of the above.

      (Correct answer is e.)

  3. 3.

    Treatment as prevention (TasP) refers to which of the following HIV prevention strategies:

    1. (a)

      Incorporating evidence-based behavioral prevention interventions within the workflow of a primary care clinic

    2. (b)

      The collecting of detailed HIV risk behavior information by primary care clinicians during routine visits

    3. (c)

      The prescription of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) by psychiatrists to patients with mental illness and high-risk HIV behavior

    4. (d)

      The use of combined antiretroviral therapy to reduce the viral load of people living with HIV and thereby preventing their infection of others

    5. (e)

      The use of Medicaid funding to support HIV education efforts

      (Correct answer is d.)

  4. 4.

    Examples of structural factors that contribute to increased HIV risk include which of the following?

    1. (a)

      A 32-year-old woman who uses intravenous drugs is ambivalent about entering treatment for opioid use disorder.

    2. (b)

      A specific state law criminalizes programs which provide clean needles to people who inject drugs.

    3. (c)

      A 55-year-old man discontinues lithium carbonate due to concerns about interactions with his antiretroviral regimen and experiences subsequent mania leading to high-risk sexual behavior.

    4. (d)

      A primary care clinician, upon learning that her patient exchanges sex for money, feels embarrassed and uncomfortable discussing methods of reducing HIV transmission risk.

    5. (e)

      A 23-year-old man who has sex with men (MSM) does not believe that he is at risk for HIV as he does not identify as gay or bisexual.

      (Correct answer is b.)

  5. 5.

    Which of the following statements is correct regarding PrEP?

    1. (a)

      All patients taking TDF/FTC for PrEP should switch to TAF/FTC as the latter combination of antiretrovirals is associated with fewer renal side effects.

    2. (b)

      It is not necessary to rule out HIV infection prior to initiating PrEP.

    3. (c)

      PrEP can only be prescribed by infectious disease physicians.

    4. (d)

      The combination TAF/FTC is not recommended for use in cisgender women because its effectiveness in this population has not been well evaluated.

    5. (e)

      Individuals on PrEP only need to be reassessed every 12 months in order to repeat HIV testing and assess for adherence, risk behaviors, and side effects.

      (Correct answer is d.)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bradley, M.V., Pereira, L.F., Cohen, M.A.A. (2022). HIV Testing and Prevention. In: Bourgeois, J.A., Cohen, M.A.A., Makurumidze, G. (eds) HIV Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80665-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80665-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80664-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80665-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics