Skip to main content

Risk Uncertainty Quantification for Various Occupancy Classes Using Stochastic Ground Motion

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SECON’21 (SECON 2021)

Abstract

Seismic events are amongst the natural hazards that are known to produce excessive economic losses and human casualties throughout history. Seismic risk can be observed as a function of hazard, exposure and vulnerability. While hazard and exposure are dependent on the site of interest and are unchangeable, studies on vulnerability can help in reducing the seismic risk by adopting retrofitting methods. One of the features that affect the damage and loss characteristics of a building is its occupancy class (commercial, residential, educational, hospitals etc.). The occupancy class of a building mainly affects the number and severity of the casualties as well as the contents damage produced during a seismic event. This work aims to compare the damage and loss properties, i.e., the number of casualties, the economic loss and the damage in properties along with the associated uncertainty of buildings having various occupancy classes by considering a single building model type and subjecting them to a set of stochastic ground motions. All building occupancy classes are according to HAZUS-MH. Normalized losses and injuries are computed using Performance Based Engineering (PBE) workflow developed by Natural Hazards Engineering Research Infrastructure (NHERI).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellingwood BR, Kinali K (2009) Quantifying and communicating uncertainty in seismic risk assessment. Struct Saf 31:179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dolce M, Prota A, Borzi B, da Porto F, Lagomarsino S, Magenes G, Moroni C, Penna A, Polese M, Speranza E, Verderame GM, Zuccaro G (2020) Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy. Bull Earthquake Eng 1–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pavel F (2021) Seismic risk assessment of on-ground circular reinforced concrete and prestressed concrete water tanks using stochastic ground motion simulations. Bull Earthquake Eng 19:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zsarnoczay A, McKenna F, Wang C, Elhaddad W, Gardner M (2019) NHERI-SimCenter/PBE: Release v2.0.0 (Version v2.0.0). Zenodo

    Google Scholar 

  5. Committee E, Whitman R, Borcherdt R, Brookshire D, Eisner R, Holmes W, Olson R, O’Rourke M, Lagorio H, Reitherman R, Solutions S (2013) HAZUS-MH 2.1 earthquake model technical manual

    Google Scholar 

  6. Agency F, Hamburger R, Bachman R, Heintz J, Hooper J, Whittaker A (2012) Seismic performance assessment of buildings, vol 1, Methodology

    Google Scholar 

  7. Scheingraber C, Käser M (2018) Uncertainty quantification for seismic risk assessment using Latin hypercube sampling and Quasi Monte Carlo simulation. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering

    Google Scholar 

  8. Passeri F, Foti S, Cox BR, Rodriguez-Marek A (2018) Influence of epistemic uncertainty in shear wave velocity on seismic ground response analyses. Earthq Spectra 35:929–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li Y, Conte JP, Barbato M (2016) Influence of time-varying frequency content in earthquake ground motions on seismic response of linear elastic systems. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 45:1271–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vlachos C, Papakonstantinou KG, Deodatis G (2018) Predictive model for site specific simulation of ground motions based on earthquake scenarios. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 47:195–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dabaghi M, Kiureghian AD (2018) Simulation of orthogonal horizontal components of near-fault ground motion for specified earthquake source and site characteristics. Earthquake Eng Struct Dynam 47:1369–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding from the Ministry of Earth Sciences, India through grant MoES/P.O. (Seismo)/1(304)/2016 is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leanda J. Payyappilly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Payyappilly, L.J., Somala, S.N. (2022). Risk Uncertainty Quantification for Various Occupancy Classes Using Stochastic Ground Motion. In: Marano, G.C., Ray Chaudhuri, S., Unni Kartha, G., Kavitha, P.E., Prasad, R., Achison, R.J. (eds) Proceedings of SECON’21. SECON 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_64

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_64

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80311-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80312-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics