Skip to main content

A Case Study on Distributive Justice: Utilising Energy Taxation and Sovereign Wealth Funds

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Challenge for Energy Justice
  • 419 Accesses

Abstract

The energy sector is characterised by inequality. There is limited literature on ensuring that distributive justice is a key policy goal of the influential practitioner area of energy taxation. Too often energy taxation policy is developed in isolation and a more holistic perspective is needed which incorporates the entire tax system and the energy justice perspective. A focus on distributive justice as an over-arching energy taxation policy goal is particularly important, as a retention of the current status quo will continue to see countries lose the majority of the benefits of their own energy resources to foreign markets and consumers. Distributive justice can also ensure increased accountability, transparency and governance in their energy sectors and hence contribute to societal energy and climate goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Nature, 551, (30 November 2017)—Available at: https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v551/n7682/index.html#out (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  2. 2.

    Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Available at: https://eiti.org/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  3. 3.

    Piketty, T. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century (translated by Goldhammer, A.). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

  4. 4.

    P. 405. Crowson, P. 2008. Mining Unearthed. Aspearmont UK: London, UK.

  5. 5.

    P. 405. Crowson (2008).

  6. 6.

    Heffron, R. J. & McCauley, D. 2017. The concept of energy justice across the disciplines. Energy Policy, 105, 658–667.

  7. 7.

    McCauley, D., Heffron, R. J. Stephan, H. and Jenkins, K. 2013. Advancing Energy Justice: The triumvirate of tenets. International Energy Law Review, 32 (3), 107–110.

  8. 8.

    Sovacool, B, Heffron, R. J., McCauley, D & Goldthau, A. 2016. Energy decisions reframed as justice and ethical concerns. Nature Energy, https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.24.

  9. 9.

    Heffron and McCauley (2017).

  10. 10.

    Heffron, R. J., Ronne, A., Bradbrook, A., Tomain, J. P. and Talus, K. 2018. A Treatise for Energy Law. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 11 (1), 34–48.

  11. 11.

    Heffron, R. J. and Talus. K. 2016. The development of energy law in the 21st century: a paradigm shift? Journal of World Energy Law and Business, 9 (3), 189–202.

  12. 12.

    Heffron, R. J. and Talus. K. 2016. The Evolution of Energy Law and Energy Jurisprudence: Insights for Energy Analysts and Researchers. Energy Research and Social Science, 19, 1–10.

  13. 13.

    Reuven Avi-Yonah, 2018. University Webpage Profile: https://www.law.umich.edu/FacultyBio/Pages/FacultyBio.aspx?FacID=aviyonah (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  14. 14.

    Deloitte. 2013. Responsible Tax: Sustainable tax strategy. Available at: https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/uk/Documents/tax/uk-tax-responsible-tax-v2.pdf (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  15. 15.

    See the data from the following two academic blog posts: Available at: (1) http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2018/01/ssrn-tax-professor-rankings-1.html and (2) http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2018/01/11-tax-profs-blow-up-the-ssrn-download-rankings.html (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  16. 16.

    Gribnau, H. and Vording, H. 2017. The Birth of Tax Law as a Legal Discipline. Harris, P. and de Cogan, D. (Eds.). 2017. Studies in the History of Tax Law, Volume 8. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

  17. 17.

    P. 167. Duff, D. 2017. Tax Policy and the Virtuous Sovereign: Dworkinian Equality and Redistributive Taxation, (pp. 167–89). In Bhandari, M. (ed). 2017. Philosophical Foundations of Tax Law. Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK.

  18. 18.

    De la Feria, R. 2018. Tax Fraud and the Rule of Law. Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation, Working Paper Series 18/02 (January 2018).

  19. 19.

    Gribnau and Vording (2017).

  20. 20.

    Nature, 2015. Special Issue on Interdisciplinarity. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/interdisciplinarity-1.18295 (last accessed 1 May 2021)

  21. 21.

    Bird, R. M. and Zolt, E. M. 2005. Redistribution Via Taxation: The Limited Role of the Personal Income Tax in Developing Countries. 52 UCLA L. Rev. 1627.

  22. 22.

    Avi-Yonah, R. S. 2006. The Three Goals of Taxation. Tax L. Rev. 60, no. 1, 1–28.

  23. 23.

    Daniel, P., Keen, M., Swistak, A. and Thuronyi, V. (Eds.). 2017. International Taxation and the Extractive Industries. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

  24. 24.

    P. 1. Daniel et al. (2017).

  25. 25.

    Heffron and Talus. 2016. The Evolution of Energy Law and Energy Jurisprudence: Insights for Energy Analysts and Researchers. Please Note: The diagram was adapted by those authors from the: US EPA, Climate Change and the Life Cycle of Stuff, available at http://epa.gov/climatechange/climate-change-waste/life-cycle-diagram.html (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  26. 26.

    Daniel et al. (2017).

  27. 27.

    Sandford, C. 2000. Why Tax Systems Differ? A Comparative Study of the Political Economy of Taxation. Fiscal Publications: Bath, UK.

  28. 28.

    Pistone, P. and Villar Ezcurra, M. (Eds.). 2016. Energy Taxation, Environmental Protection and State Aids: Tracing the Path from Divergence to Convergence. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IBFD.

  29. 29.

    Traversa, E. and Wolff, S. 2016. Energy Tax Policy in an EU Context: Non-Discrimination, Free Movement and Tax Harmonisation. In Pistone and Villar Ezcurra, M. (Eds.). 2016.

  30. 30.

    Pitrone, F. 2016. Design of Energy Taxes in the European Union: Looking for a Higher Level of Environmental Protection. In Pistone and Villar Ezcurra, M. (Eds.). 2016.

  31. 31.

    Tirole, J. 2017. Economics for the Common Good. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  32. 32.

    Rietveld, M. and Toledano, P. (Eds.). 2017. The New Frontiers of Sovereign Investment. New York: Columbia University Press

  33. 33.

    Tsani, S. 2013. Natural resources, governance and institutional quality: The role of resource funds. Resources Policy. Vol. 38 (2) 181–195.

  34. 34.

    Alhashel, B. 2015. Sovereign Wealth Funds: A Literature Review. Journal of Business and Economics. Vol. 78, 1–13.

  35. 35.

    P. 5, Rietveld and Toledano (2017).

  36. 36.

    Carpantier, J. F. and Vermeulen, W. N. 2018. Emergence of Sovereign Wealth Funds. Journal of Commodity Markets 11 (C), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomm.2018.01.002

  37. 37.

    Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. 2018. Available at: https://www.swfinstitute.org/sovereign-wealth-fund-rankings/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  38. 38.

    Alhashel (2015).

  39. 39.

    Texas Permanent University Fund (US). 2018. https://www.utsystem.edu/puf (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  40. 40.

    The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. 2018. https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  41. 41.

    Alberta Heritage Fund (Canada). 2018. http://finance.alberta.ca/business/ahstf/index.html (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  42. 42.

    Sovereign Wealth Fund Institute. 2018. Available at: https://www.swfinstitute.org/sovereign-wealth-fund-rankings/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  43. 43.

    All the data in this sub-section on A Model SWF in Practice is from the website of The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. 2018. https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  44. 44.

    The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (2018).

  45. 45.

    The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (2018).

  46. 46.

    Financial Times. 2018. DRC mining co to renegotiate all contracts within next year (6 February 2018). Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/d6cb308a-0b4e-11e8-8eb7-42f857ea9f09 (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  47. 47.

    The Carter Center. 2017. A State Affair: Privatizing Congo’s Copper Sector. (Atlanta, GA, US). Available at: https://www.cartercenter.org/resources/pdfs/news/peace_publications/democracy/congo-report-carter-center-nov-2017.pdf (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  48. 48.

    ICIJ (Fitzgibbon, W.). 2017. Paradise Papers Research Raises Questions Over Glencore’s $440m Congo Discount. (14 December). Available at: https://www.icij.org/investigations/paradise-papers/paradise-papers-research-raises-questions-glencores-440m-congo-discount/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  49. 49.

    The Guardian. 2017. Paradise Papers prompt criminal complaint against Glencore. (21 December). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/dec/21/paradise-papers-prompt-criminal-complaint-against-glencore (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  50. 50.

    The Guardian. 2017. Paradise Papers: US puts sanctions on billionaire over dealings in DRC. (22 December). Available at: https://www.theguardian.com/news/2017/dec/22/paradise-papers-us-sanctions-billionaire-dealings-drc (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  51. 51.

    Financial Times. 2018. Ivanhoe founder Robert Friedland joins debate over DRC mining code (7 February). Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/44800d7c-0be4-11e8-839d-41ca06376bf2 (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  52. 52.

    Tsani (2013).

  53. 53.

    US Department of State. 2015. 2015 Investment Climate Statement—Democratic Republic of the Congo. Available at: https://www.state.gov/e/eb/rls/othr/ics/2015/241522.htm (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  54. 54.

    Calder, J. 2014. Administering Fiscal Regimes for Extractive Industries: A Handbook. Washington DC, US: IMF.

  55. 55.

    Radley, B. 2016. The limits of corporate social responsibility and the possibilities for harnessing mining to reinstitute processes of state-led local development in the DRC. In F Reyntjens, S Vandeginste & M Verpoorten (Eds.), L’Afrique des Grands Lacs Annuaire, 2015–2016 (pp. 169–186). Paris: L’Harmattan.

  56. 56.

    World Bank. 2008. Democratic Republic of Congo Growth with Governance In the Mining Sector. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTOGMC/Resources/336099-1156955107170/drcgrowthgovernanceenglish.pdf (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  57. 57.

    The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global (2018).

  58. 58.

    Multiple reports available on this: Amnesty International. 2018. Is my Smartphone powered by Child Labour? Available at: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/campaigns/2016/06/drc-cobalt-child-labour/ (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  59. 59.

    International Trade Administration (ITA)—U.S. Department of Commerce. 2018. Congo (DR)—Mining and Minerals. Available at: https://www.export.gov/article?id=Congo-Democratic-Republic-Mining-and-Minerals (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  60. 60.

    International Trade Administration (ITA)—U.S. Department of Commerce. 2018. Congo (DR)—Energy. Available at: https://www.export.gov/article?id=Congo-Democratic-Republic-Energy (last accessed 1 May 2021).

  61. 61.

    P. 48. Heffron, R. J., Ronne, A., Bradbrook, A., Tomain, J. P. and Talus, K. 2018. A Treatise for Energy Law. Journal of World Energy Law & Business, 11 (1), 34–48.

  62. 62.

    P. 40. Heffron et al. (2018).

  63. 63.

    International Forum of Sovereign Wealth Funds. 2018. Santiago Principles. Available at: http://www.ifswf.org/santiago-principles-landing/santiago-principles (last accessed 1 May 2021).

References

  • Alhashel, B. 2015. Sovereign Wealth Funds: A Literature Review. Journal of Business and Economics 78: 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowson, P. 2008. Mining Unearthed. London, UK: Aspearmont UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, P., M. Keen, A. Swistak, and V. Thuronyi, eds. 2017. International Taxation and the Extractive Industries. Oxford, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribnau, H., and H. Vording. 2017. The Birth of Tax Law as a Legal Discipline. In Studies in the History of Tax Law, ed. P. Harris and D. de Cogan, vol. 8. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffron, R.J., and D. McCauley. 2017. The Concept of Energy Justice across the Disciplines. Energy Policy 105: 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld, M., and P. Toledano, eds. 2017. The New Frontiers of Sovereign Investment. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Norwegian Government Pension Fund Global. 2018. Accessed 1 May 2021. https://www.nbim.no/en/the-fund/.

  • Tsani, S. 2013. Natural Resources, Governance and Institutional Quality: The Role of Resource Funds. Resources Policy 38 (2): 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raphael J Heffron .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Heffron, R.J. (2021). A Case Study on Distributive Justice: Utilising Energy Taxation and Sovereign Wealth Funds. In: The Challenge for Energy Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80097-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80097-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80096-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80097-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics