Skip to main content

Transitioning from a Linear to a Circular Construction Supply Chain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Climate Emergency – Managing, Building , and Delivering the Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

Circular economy (CE), unlike the linear (take-make-dispose) economy, is an economic paradigm which envisions that materials and products are kept at their highest quality and value as useful resources. To achieve a circular economy in the construction industry, supply chain firms that operate in the sector will have to adopt circular business models to generate value throughout the life cycle of built assets. In this study, the experiences of construction supply chain firms are explored to understand the critical factors that can enable circular economy transition in the supply chain. A qualitative research strategy was adopted, and data was collected using exploratory semi-structured interviews with 14 participants spanning 12 stakeholder organisations in the UK and France, respectively. Thematic analysis of the transcripts revealed nine critical success factors for circular economy transition: (1) maturity of markets for circular products; (2) flexible business models that allow for innovation; (3) change in mindset and communication strategy; (4) minimising costs of secondary production; (5) collaboration amongst industry stakeholders; (6) flexible regulations and standards that embrace innovation; (7) industry leadership; (8) design for deconstruction; and (9) availability of resources in commercial quantities. Particularly, strong collaboration across industry stakeholders (e.g. deconstruction specialists, trade federations, client organisations, designers and regulators) and the need to minimise secondary production costs are critical for driving circular economy in the construction supply chain. These findings imply that economic incentives that minimise secondary production costs (e.g. tax breaks and subsidies for circular adoption and higher taxes for virgin resources) can be used to encourage construction supply chain firms to transition towards circular economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • BAM, & ARUP. (2017). Circular business models for the built environment. https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/a/8436_business-models-low-res.pdf

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M. (2011). Logistics and supply chain management (4th ed.). Edinburgh Pearson Education Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A.W., Ireland, P., & Townsend, M. (2006). Managing in construction supply chains and markets: reactive and proactive options for improving performance and relationship menagement. Thomas Telford Services Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIT Climate-KIC. (2019). The challenges and potential of circular procurements in public construction projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015a). Growth within: A circular economy for a competitive Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015b) Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the circular economy - AI as a tool to accelerate the transition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a circular economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 618–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honic, M., Kovacic, I., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Improving the recycling potential of buildings through Material Passports (MP): An Austrian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 787–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-Afari, P., & Amor, B. (2020). Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130, 109948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, B. L. (2017). Thematic analysis/interpretive thematic analysis. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–9). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, L. A. L., Ramón, X. R., & Domingo, S. G. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector–a review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraven, D., Bukvić, U., Di Maio, F., & Hertogh, M. (2019). Circular transition: Changes and responsibilities in the Dutch stony material supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tingley, D. D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Caneghem, J., Van Acker, K., De Greef, J., Wauters, G., & Vandecasteele, C. (2019). Waste-to-energy is compatible and complementary with recycling in the circular economy. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(5), 925–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vilella, M. (2019). Waste-to-energy is not a sustainable business the EU says, Zerowaste Europe. https://zerowasteeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/zero_waste_europe_policy_briefing_sustainable_finance_en.pdf

  • Virlanuta, F. O., David, S., & Manea, L. D. (2020). The transition from linear economy to circular economy: A behavioral change. FORCE: Focus on Research in Contemporary Economics, 1(1), 4–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witjes, S., & Lozano, R. (2016). Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emmanuel Manu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Manu, E., Ankrah, N.A., Bentrar, J. (2022). Transitioning from a Linear to a Circular Construction Supply Chain. In: Gorse, C., Scott, L., Booth, C., Dastbaz, M. (eds) Climate Emergency – Managing, Building , and Delivering the Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79450-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79450-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79449-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79450-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics