Abstract
Circular economy (CE), unlike the linear (take-make-dispose) economy, is an economic paradigm which envisions that materials and products are kept at their highest quality and value as useful resources. To achieve a circular economy in the construction industry, supply chain firms that operate in the sector will have to adopt circular business models to generate value throughout the life cycle of built assets. In this study, the experiences of construction supply chain firms are explored to understand the critical factors that can enable circular economy transition in the supply chain. A qualitative research strategy was adopted, and data was collected using exploratory semi-structured interviews with 14 participants spanning 12 stakeholder organisations in the UK and France, respectively. Thematic analysis of the transcripts revealed nine critical success factors for circular economy transition: (1) maturity of markets for circular products; (2) flexible business models that allow for innovation; (3) change in mindset and communication strategy; (4) minimising costs of secondary production; (5) collaboration amongst industry stakeholders; (6) flexible regulations and standards that embrace innovation; (7) industry leadership; (8) design for deconstruction; and (9) availability of resources in commercial quantities. Particularly, strong collaboration across industry stakeholders (e.g. deconstruction specialists, trade federations, client organisations, designers and regulators) and the need to minimise secondary production costs are critical for driving circular economy in the construction supply chain. These findings imply that economic incentives that minimise secondary production costs (e.g. tax breaks and subsidies for circular adoption and higher taxes for virgin resources) can be used to encourage construction supply chain firms to transition towards circular economy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
BAM, & ARUP. (2017). Circular business models for the built environment. https://www.arup.com/-/media/arup/files/publications/a/8436_business-models-low-res.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Christopher, M. (2011). Logistics and supply chain management (4th ed.). Edinburgh Pearson Education Ltd.
Cox, A.W., Ireland, P., & Townsend, M. (2006). Managing in construction supply chains and markets: reactive and proactive options for improving performance and relationship menagement. Thomas Telford Services Ltd.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
EIT Climate-KIC. (2019). The challenges and potential of circular procurements in public construction projects.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015a). Growth within: A circular economy for a competitive Europe.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2015b) Towards a circular economy: Business rationale for an accelerated transition.
Ellen MacArthur Foundation. (2019). Artificial intelligence and the circular economy - AI as a tool to accelerate the transition.
Esposito, M., Tse, T., & Soufani, K. (2018). Introducing a circular economy: New thinking with new managerial and policy implications. California Management Review, 60(3), 5–19.
Ghisellini, P., Ripa, M., & Ulgiati, S. (2018). Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 618–643.
Honic, M., Kovacic, I., & Rechberger, H. (2019). Improving the recycling potential of buildings through Material Passports (MP): An Austrian case study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 217, 787–797.
Hossain, M. U., Ng, S. T., Antwi-Afari, P., & Amor, B. (2020). Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 130, 109948.
Kirchherr, J., Reike, D., & Hekkert, M. (2017). Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, 221–232.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.
Morseletto, P. (2020). Targets for a circular economy. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104553.
Nasir, M. H. A., Genovese, A., Acquaye, A. A., Koh, S., & Yamoah, F. (2017). Comparing linear and circular supply chains: A case study from the construction industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 443–457.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Dickinson, W. B., Leech, N. L., & Zoran, A. G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in focus group research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21.
Peterson, B. L. (2017). Thematic analysis/interpretive thematic analysis. In The international encyclopedia of communication research methods (pp. 1–9). Wiley.
Ponterotto, J. G. (2005). Qualitative research in counseling psychology: A primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52(2), 126.
Ruiz, L. A. L., Ramón, X. R., & Domingo, S. G. (2020). The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector–a review and an integrative model approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 248, 119238.
Schraven, D., Bukvić, U., Di Maio, F., & Hertogh, M. (2019). Circular transition: Changes and responsibilities in the Dutch stony material supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 150, 104359.
Teece, D. J. (2010). Business models, business strategy and innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 172–194.
Tingley, D. D., Cooper, S., & Cullen, J. (2017). Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 148, 642–652.
Van Caneghem, J., Van Acker, K., De Greef, J., Wauters, G., & Vandecasteele, C. (2019). Waste-to-energy is compatible and complementary with recycling in the circular economy. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(5), 925–939.
Vilella, M. (2019). Waste-to-energy is not a sustainable business the EU says, Zerowaste Europe. https://zerowasteeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/zero_waste_europe_policy_briefing_sustainable_finance_en.pdf
Virlanuta, F. O., David, S., & Manea, L. D. (2020). The transition from linear economy to circular economy: A behavioral change. FORCE: Focus on Research in Contemporary Economics, 1(1), 4–18.
Witjes, S., & Lozano, R. (2016). Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 112, 37–44.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Manu, E., Ankrah, N.A., Bentrar, J. (2022). Transitioning from a Linear to a Circular Construction Supply Chain. In: Gorse, C., Scott, L., Booth, C., Dastbaz, M. (eds) Climate Emergency – Managing, Building , and Delivering the Sustainable Development Goals. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79450-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79450-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79449-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79450-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)