Skip to main content

Restoring the Sense of Touch Using a Sensorimotor Demultiplexing Neural Interface: ‘Disentangling’ Sensorimotor Events During Brain-Computer Interface Control

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Brain-Computer Interface Research

Abstract

Rationale Paralyzed muscles can be reanimated following spinal cord injury (SCI) using a brain-computer interface (BCI) to enhance motor function alone. Importantly, the sense of touch is a key component of motor function. Simultaneously restoring the sense of touch and movement would meet functional needs for BCI users that seek to enhance upper limb function following SCI. Methods The study met institutional requirements for the conduct of human subjects and is registered on the http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov website (identifier: NCT01997125). The participant was a 27-year-old male with stable, non-spastic C5 quadriplegia resulting from a cervical SCI. The participant underwent implantation of a 96 channel Utah microelectrode recording array (Blackrock Microsystems, Inc.; Salt Lake, Utah) in his left primary motor cortex. The hand area of motor cortex was identified preoperatively by fusing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) activation maps obtained while the participant attempted movements co-registered to the preoperative planning MRI. During experiments, the participant was either completely blinded to the experimental conditions or given brief instructions to complete the necessary actions. Cue and trial parameters were randomized as needed. Results Results are adapted from (Ganzer PD, Colachis 4th SC, Schwemmer MA, Friedenberg DA, Dunlap CF, Swiftney CE, Sharma G in Restoring the sense of touch using a sensorimotor demultiplexing neural interface. Cell 2020). We demonstrate that a human participant with a clinically complete SCI can use a BCI to simultaneously reanimate both motor function and the sense of touch, leveraging residual touch signaling from their own hand. In primary motor cortex (M1), residual subperceptual hand touch signals are simultaneously demultiplexed from ongoing efferent motor intention, enabling intracortically controlled closed-loop sensory feedback. Using the closed-loop demultiplexing BCI almost fully restored the ability to detect object touch, and significantly improved several sensorimotor functions. Conclusion These results demonstrate that subperceptual neural signals can be decoded from human cortex and transformed into conscious perception, significantly augmenting function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ganzer PD, Colachis SC IV, Schwemmer MA., Friedenberg DA, Dunlap CF, Swiftney CE, Sharma G (2020) Restoring the sense of touch using a sensorimotor demultiplexing neural interface. Cell

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wrigley PJ, Siddall PJ, Gustin SM (2018) New evidence for preserved somatosensory pathways in complete spinal cord injury: a fMRI study. Hum Brain Mapp 39(1):588–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Awad A, Levi R, Lindgren L, Hultling C, Westling G, Nyberg L, Eriksson J (2015) Preserved somatosensory conduction in a patient with complete cervical spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med 47(5):426–431. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ioannides AA, Liu L, Khurshudyan A, Bodley R, Poghosyan V, Shibata T, Dammers J, Jamous A (2002) Brain activation sequences following electrical limb stimulation of normal and paraplegic subjects. Neuroimage 16(1):115–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sabbah P, De SS, Leveque C, Gay S, Pfefer F, Nioche C, Sarrazin JL, Barouti H, Tadie M, Cordoliani YS (2002) Sensorimotor cortical activity in patients with complete spinal cord injury: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurotrauma 19(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson KD (2004) Targeting recovery: priorities of the spinal cord-injured population. J Neurotrauma 21:1371–1383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Snoek GJ, IJzerman MJ, Hermens HJ, Maxwell D and Biering-Sorensen F (2004) Survey of the needs of patients with spinal cord injury: impact and priority for improvement in hand function in tetraplegics. Nat Spinal Cord 42 526–32

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blabe CH, Gilja V, Chestek CA, Shenoy KV, Anderson KD, Henderson JM (2015) Assessment of brain–machine interfaces from the perspective of people with paralysis. J Neural Eng 12:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Lebedev MA, Nicolelis MAL (2017) Brain-machine interfaces: from basic science to neuroprostheses and neurorehabilitation. Physiol Rev 97:767–837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hochberg LR et al (2012) Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature 485:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Collinger JL et al (2013) High-performance neuroprosthetic control by an individual with tetraplegia. The Lancet 381:557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilja V et al (2015) Clinical translation of a high-performance neural prosthesis. Nat Med 21:1142–1145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Simeral JD, Kim SP, Black MJ, Donoghue JP, Hochberg LR (2011) Neural control of cursor trajectory and click by a human with tetraplegia 1000 days after implant of an intracortical microelectrode array. J Neural Eng 8:025027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarosiewicz B et al (2015) Virtual typing by people with tetraplegia using a self-calibrating intracortical brain–computer interface. Sci Transl Med 7:313ra179

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bockbrader MA, Francisco G, Lee R, Olson J, Solinsky R, Boninger ML (2018) Brain computer interfaces in rehabilitation medicine. PM&R. 10(9S2):S233-S243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2018.05.028

  16. Moxon KA, Foffani G (2015) Brain-machine interfaces beyond neuroprosthetics. Neuron 86(1):55–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bouton CE, Shaikhouni A, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA, Nielson DM, Sharma G, Sederberg PB, Glenn BC, Mysiw WJ, Morgan AG, Deogaonkar M, Rezai AR (2016) Restoring cortical control of functional movement in a human with quadriplegia. Nature 533(7602):247–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedenberg DA, Schwemmer MA, Landgraf AJ, Annetta NV, Bockbrader MA, Bouton CE, Zhang M, Rezai AR, Mysiw WJ, Bresler HS, Sharma G (2017) Neuroprosthetic enabled control of graded arm muscle contraction in a paralyzed human. Sci Rep 7(1):8386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharma G, Friedenberg DA, Annetta N, Glenn B, Bockbrader M, Majstorovic C, Domas S, Mysiw WJ, Rezai A, Bouton C (2016) Using an artificial neural bypass to restore cortical control of rhythmic movements in a human with quadriplegia. Sci Rep 6:33807. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Skomrock ND, Schwemmer MA, Ting JE, Trivedi HR, Sharma G, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA (2018) A characterization of brain-computer interface performance trade-offs using support vector machines and deep neural networks to decode movement intent. Front Neurosci 12:763. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schwemmer MA, Skomrock ND, Sederberg PB, Ting JE, Sharma G, Bockbrader MA, Friedenberg DA (2018) Meeting brain-computer interface user performance expectations using a deep neural network decoding framework. Nat Med 24:1669–1676. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-018-0171-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Colachis SC 4th, Bockbrader MA, Zhang M, Friedenberg DA, Annetta NV, Schwemmer MA, Skomrock ND, Mysiw WJ, Rezai AR, Bresler HS, Sharma G (2018) Dexterous control of seven functional hand movements using cortically-controlled transcutaneous muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia. Front Neurosci 12:208. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2018.00208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ajiboye AB et al (2017) Restoration of reaching and grasping movements through brain-controlled muscle stimulation in a person with tetraplegia: a proof-of-concept demonstration. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30601-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bockbrader M, Annetta N, Friedenberg D, Schwemmer M, Skomrock N, Colachis S 4th, Zhang M, Bouton C, Rezai A, Sharma G, Mysiw WJ (2019) Clinically significant gains in skillful grasp coordination by an individual with tetraplegia using an implanted brain-computer interface with forearm transcutaneous muscle stimulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. pii:S0003–9993(19)30163–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.445

  25. Manohar A, Foffani G, Ganzer PD, Bethea J, Moxon KA (2017) Cortex dependent recovery of unassisted hindlimb locomotion after complete spinal cord injury in the adult rat. eLife 6 pii: e23532

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ganzer PD, Moxon KA, Knudsen EB, Shumsky JS (2013) Serotonergic pharmacotherapy promotes cortical reorganization after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 241:84–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Annetta N, Friend J, Schimmoeller A, Buck VS, Friedenberg D, Bouton CE, Bockbrader MA, Ganzer P, Colachis S, Zhang M, Mysiw WJ, Rezai AR, Sharma G (2018) A high definition non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation system for cortical control of combinatorial rotary hand movements in a human with tetraplegia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2018.2864104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Obhi SS, Hall P (2011) Sense of agency and intentional binding in joint action. Exp Brain Res 211:655–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wuolle KS, Doren CLV, Thrope GB, Keith MW, Peckham PH (1994) Development of a quantitative hand grasp and release test for patients with tetraplegia using a hand neuroprosthesis. J Hand Surg 19:209–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar N, Manjaly JA, Miyapuram KP (2014) Feedback about action performed can alter the sense of self-agency. Front Psychol 5:145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Financial support for this study came from Battelle Memorial Institute and The Ohio State University Center for Neuromodulation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick D. Ganzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ganzer, P.D. et al. (2021). Restoring the Sense of Touch Using a Sensorimotor Demultiplexing Neural Interface: ‘Disentangling’ Sensorimotor Events During Brain-Computer Interface Control. In: Guger, C., Allison, B.Z., Gunduz, A. (eds) Brain-Computer Interface Research. SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79287-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79287-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-79286-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-79287-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics