Skip to main content

Select Rare Disease Drug Approvals: Lessons Learned

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Rare Disease Drug Development
  • 615 Accesses

Abstract

Until the passage of the US Orphan Drug Act of 1983, only a small number of rare diseases had approved therapies. Since then, there has been a marked increase in rare disease research funding and development efforts, due to regulatory changes, multiple international initiatives, and financial incentives.

Despite the rapidly growing number of rare disease product regulatory approvals and pending applications, obtaining US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) or European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval does not guarantee payer reimbursement. Additionally, despite efforts to harmonize the regions, there are still discrepancies in the evaluations of the new therapies between North America and Europe, leading to differences in the access to products in these regions.

The authors have seen examples where drugs approved for neurological rare diseases were given conditional coverage or were restricted to a certain small group of patients who participated or benefited the most in the clinical trials based on age or level of function. On the other hand, in some instances, populations not included in the clinical trials have been accepted to support marketing authorizations.

Growing concerns regarding the gap between the demand for health services and technologies and the available resources have driven introduction of systems to access robust information around clinical benefit, value for money, and potential adoption/diffusion and affordability of therapies coming to market. Pricing is also being analyzed in light of growing healthcare expenditures and the economic crisis linked to COVID-19.

This chapter will discuss recent rare disease drug approvals with a focus on neuromuscular diseases, specifically Duchenne muscular dystrophy and spinal muscular atrophy. These approvals have recently affected (and, in some cases, improved) patients’ lives and required investigation of new ways of obtaining reimbursement from insurers and government systems. These issues will be discussed in addition to the importance of safety and tolerability of the potential new treatments in rare neurological diseases. The authors will highlight some of the post-approval research and development (R&D) and commercial challenges that these novel products are facing in the global marketplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Progress in Fighting Rare Diseases. PhRMA Website (phrma.org). Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  2. Hahn SM. Rare disease day 2020: FDA continues important work on treatments for rare diseases, February 21, 2020. Accessed at www.fda.gov on 19 Nov 2020.

  3. Evaluate Pharma’s Orphan Drug Report 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  4. List of FDA Orphan Drugs. Genetic and Rare Diseases at: rarediseases.info.nih.gov. Accessed 19 Nov 2020.

  5. Maynard JM. FDA is working to bridge the gaps and meet the needs for rare disease product development, published May 29, 2019 (at www.fda.gov). Accessed 19 Nov 2020.

  6. EURORDIS Rare Diseases Europe Website. List of the latest marketing authorizations and orphan medicinal products designations at https://www.eurordis.org/orphan-drug-designations-marketingauthorisations. Accessed 17 Dec 2020.

  7. FDA Website, 2020 Biological Approvals at https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/development-approvalprocess-cber/2020-biological-license-application-approvals. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  8. Mendell JR, Shilling C, et al. Evidence-based path to newborn screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(3):304–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muscular Dystrophy News Today, Life Expectancy, at musculardystrophynews.com. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  10. Sarepta therapeutics announces FDA approval of amondys 45 (casimersen) injection for the treatment of Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) in patients amenable to skipping exon 45, 25 Feb 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  11. FDA News Release. FDA approves targeted treatment for rare Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation, 12 Aug 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  12. FDA News Release. FDA grants accelerated approval to first targeted treatment for rare Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutation, 12 Dec 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  13. FDA News Release. FDA approves drug to treat Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 09 Feb 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  14. FDA News Release. d FDA grants accelerated approval to first drug for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, 19 Sept 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Translarna Summary of Product Characteristics (last updated September 29, 2020), European Medicines Agency Website (ema.europe.eu). Accessed 24 Nov 2020.

  16. PTC therapeutics receives conditional approval in the European Union for Translarna™ for the treatment of nonsense mutation Duchenne muscular dystrophy, August 4, 2014, company Website.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mecuri E, Muntoni F, Osorio AN, et al. Safety and effectiveness of ataluren: comparison of results from the STRIDE Registry and CINRG DMD Natural History Study. J Comp Eff Res. 9(5), Research Article Open Access, published online: 30 Jan 2020 at https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2019-0171; https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/cer-2019-0171. Accessed 27 Dec 27, 2020.

  18. Sarepta Receives Negative CHMP Re-examination Opinion for Eteplirsen, September 21, 2018, investorrelations.sarepta.com. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  19. Johnson CY. An old drug gets a new price to fight a rare disease: $89,000; The Washington Post, February 10, 2017 at https://www.abqjournal.com/947324/an-old-drug-gets-a-new-price-to-fight-a-rare-disease-89000-a-year.html. Accessed 29 Dec 2020.

  20. At FDA’s Website (fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements). Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  21. Carroll J. After being spurned at the FDA, PTC buys a controversial Duchenne MD therapy from Marathon, Endpoints News, 16 March 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neurology. 2016; 87(20): 2123–2131.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Carroll J. Was PTC Therapeutics playing games when it tried to defuse the Deflazacort controversy with a $35,000 annual price? Endpoints News, 8 May 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pollack A. Advisors to F.D.A. vote against Duchenne muscular dystrophy drug. New York Times, April 15, 2016 at https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/26/business/muscular-dystrophy-drug-fda-sarepta-eteplirsen.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2021.

  25. Eteplirsen LC. A controversial approval. Cases and tools in biotechnology management (ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub). Accessed on line 20 Nov 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ledford H. US government approves controversial drug for muscular dystrophy, Nature, International Weekly Journal of Science, 20 Sept 2016. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20645.

  27. Controversy Surrounds Exondys 51 Approval. What you should know (managedhealthcareexecutive.com), published August 4, 2017. Accessed 20 Nov 2020.

  28. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Application Number 206488Orig1s000, Summary Review (of Eteplirsen: NDA 206488), Commisioner’s Decision dated September 16, 2016 (at accessdata.fda.gov). Accessed on 20 Nov 2020.

  29. European Medicines Agency, Exondys (eteplirsen), Table of Contents, at https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/exondys. Accessed 24 Dec 2020.

  30. Carroll J. Sarepta gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy fails on function – raising serious questions about all of their drugs. Endpoints News, January 7, 2021 at https://endpts.com/sarepta-gene-therapy-for-duchenne-muscular-dystrophy-fails-on-function-raising-serious-questions-about-all-their-drugs/. Accessed 10 Jan 2021.

  31. Lally C, Jones C, Farwell W, Reyna SP, Cook SF, Flanders WD. Indirect estimation of the prevalence of spinal muscular atrophy Type I, II, and III in the United States. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2017;12:175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-017-0724-z. Accessed 24 Dec 2020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Wirth B, Karakaya M, Kye MJ, Mendoza-Ferreira N. Twenty-five years of spinal muscular atrophy research: from phenotype to genotype to therapy, and what comes next. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2020;21:231–61. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genom-102319-103602. Accessed 24 Dec 2020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. De Sanctis R, Coratti G, Pasternak A, et al. Developmental milestones in type I spinal muscular atrophy. Neuromuscul Disord. 2016;26:754–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Oskoui M, Levy G, Garland CJ, Gray JM, O’Hagen J, De Vivo DC, Kaufmann P. The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy type 1. Neurology. 2007;69:1931–6. At http://www.neurology.org/cgi/content/full/69/20/1931. Accessed 26 Dec 2020.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Wirth B, Brichta L, Schrank B, et al. Mildly affected patients with spinal muscular atrophy are partially protected by an increased SMN2 copy number. Hum Genet. 2006;119:422–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-006-0156-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Glascock J, Sampson J, Haidet-Phillips A, et al. Treatment algorithm for infants diagnosed with spinal muscular atrophy through newborn screening. J Neuromuscul Dis. 2018;5:145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Singh NN, Howell MD, Androphy EJ, Singh RN. How the discovery of ISSN1 led to the first medical therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. Gene Ther. 2017;24:520–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. FDA Website. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Application Number: 209531Orig1s000, Administrative and Correspondence Documents at https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/nda/2016/209531Orig1s000Admincorres.pdf. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  39. Chiriboga CA, Swoboda KJ, Darras BT, et al. Results from a Phase I study of Nusinersen (ISIS-SMNRx) in Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Neurology. 2016;86, 2016 at https://n.neurology.org/content/neurology/86/10/890.full.pdf.

  40. Finkel RS, Chiriboga CA, Vajsar J, et al. Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a Phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study. Lancet. 2016;388:3017–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31408-8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Finkel RS, Mercuri E, Darras BT, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1723–32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1702752.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Mercuri E, Darras BT, Chiriboga CA, et al. Nusinersen versus sham control in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:625–35. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1710504.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nusinersen initiated in infants during the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: Interim efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 NURTURE study. Neuromuscul Disord. 2019;29(11):842–56. https://www.nmd-journal.com/article/S0960-8966(19)31127-7/fulltext.

  44. Mendell JR, Al-Zaidy S, Shell R, et al. Single-dose gene-replacement therapy for spinal muscular atrophy. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:1713–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Novartis Website. “Zolgensma® data shows rapid, significant, clinically meaningful benefit in SMA including prolonged event-free survival, motor milestone achievement and durability now up to 5 years post-dosing”, March 24, 2020 at https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/zolgensma-data-shows-rapid-significant-clinically-meaningful-benefit-sma-including-prolonged-event-free-survival-motor-milestone-achievement-and-durability-now. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  46. Avexis Website. Overview of the Zolgensma Clinical Studies at https://www.zolgensma.com/clinical-studies. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  47. Novartis Website. Zolgensma® data including patients with more severe SMA at baseline further demonstrate therapeutic benefit, including prolonged event-free survival, increased motor function and milestone achievement, October 1, 2020 at https://www.novartis.com/news/media-releases/zolgensma-data-including-patients-more-severe-sma-baseline-further-demonstrate-therapeutic-benefit-including-prolonged-event-free-survival-increased-motor. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  48. Landon-Cardinal O, Baril-Dionne A, Hoa S, et al. Recognising the spectrum of scleromyositis: HEp-2 ANA patterns allow identification of a novel clinical subset with anti-SMN autoantibodies. RMD Open. 2020;6(2):e001357. https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2020-001357.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Risdiplam DS. First approval. Drugs. Published online October 12, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40265-020-01410-z.

  50. O’Keefe L. FDA approves oral treatment for spinal muscular atrophy. FDA News Release, August 7, 2020. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/pressannouncements/fda-approves-oral-treatment-spinal-muscular-atrophy. Accessed 24 Dec 2020.

  51. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2019; 42: 385–406. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-070918-050501.

  52. European Medicines Agency. Zolgensma table of contents; https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/medicines/human/EPAR/zolgensma. Accessed 26 Dec 2020.

  53. Novartis Website. Avexis receives EC approval and activates “Day One” access program for Zolgensma, the only gene therapy for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), published on May 19, 2020 at https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2020/05/19/2035354/0/en/AveXis-receives-EC-approval-and-activates-Day-One-access-program-for-Zolgensma-the-only-gene-therapy-for-spinal-muscular-atrophy-SMA.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2021.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raymond A. Huml .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Huml, R.A., Leon, T. (2021). Select Rare Disease Drug Approvals: Lessons Learned. In: Huml, R.A. (eds) Rare Disease Drug Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78605-2_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78605-2_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78604-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78605-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics