Skip to main content

Characteristics of Farms in the European Union: Relationships Between Energy Costs and Other Variables

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy Costs and Farm Characteristics in the European Union

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES))

  • 92 Accesses

Abstract

The very characteristics of agriculture call for specific attention when it comes to the evolution of this sector across the globe. In fact, this is a sector which produces essential products to meet basic human needs, but usually requires public intervention, through agricultural policies, to avoid an unbalanced evolution between demand and supply having consequences on market prices. This is because agricultural policies are so famous across the world and specifically in the European Union, in the framework of the Common Agricultural Policy. On the other hand, the great diversity of agricultural realities among regions calls for specific strategies to be adjusted to local particularities. In addition, climate change and global warming bring new challenges, namely in the use of critical resources (because of their scarcity and environmental impacts), such as energy and water. In this context, it would seem pertinent to assess the interrelationships between energy use in European Union farms and other farming variables, namely to identify how the energy consumption is affected by other dimensions in the sector. For this purpose, data from the European Union Farm Accountancy Data Network were considered for the period 2013–2018. This statistical information was first explored through descriptive analysis and then with matrices of correlation. As main insights, it is important to note that energy costs increased, on average over the period considered, by 2.7%. On the other hand, farms with a higher level of intensification and higher energy costs are those that receive more subsidies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Motor fuels and lubricants, electricity, heating fuels” [26].

  2. 2.

    “Total utilised agricultural area of holding. Does not include areas used for mushrooms, land rented for less than one year on an occasional basis, woodland and other farm areas (roads, ponds, non-farmed areas, etc.). It consists of land in owner occupation, rented land and land in share-cropping (remuneration linked to output from land made available). It includes agricultural land temporarily not under cultivation for agricultural reasons or being withdrawn from production as part of agricultural policy measures. It is expressed in hectares” [26].

  3. 3.

    “Number of equines, cattle, sheep, goats, pigs and poultry present on holding (annual average), converted into livestock units. Not included are beehives and other animals. Animals which do not belong to the holder but are held under a production contract are taken into account according to their annual presence” [26].

  4. 4.

    “Total of output of crops and crop products, livestock and livestock products and of other output” [26].

  5. 5.

    “Costs linked to the agricultural activity of the holder and related to the output of the accounting year.

    Included are amounts relating to inputs produced on the holding (farm use) = seeds and seedlings and feed for grazing stock and granivores, but not manure. When calculating FADN standard results, farm taxes and other dues are not included in the total for costs but are taken into account in the balance Subsidies and taxes (subsidies—taxes) on current and non-current operations. The personal taxes of the holder are not to be recorded in the FADN accounts” [26].

  6. 6.

    “Farm taxes and other dues (not including VAT and the personal taxes of the holder) and taxes and other charges on land and buildings. Subsidies on taxes are deducted” [26].

  7. 7.

    “Output—Intermediate consumption + Balance current subsidies and Taxes” [26].

References

  1. T.N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, J. Maroulis, Greenhouse gas emissions from rice farming inputs a cross-country assessment. J. Agric. Sci. 147, 117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. E. S. Azzi, E. Karltun, C. Sundberg, Small-scale biochar production on swedish farms: a model for estimating potential, variability, and environmental performance. J. Clean Prod. 280, 124873 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. C. Baillie, G. Chen, Opporunities for reducing on-farm energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in sugarcane. Int. Sugar J. 114, 725 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P. Pellegrini, R.J. Fernandez, Crop intensification, land use, and on-farm energy-use efficiency during the worldwide spread of the green revolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115, 2335 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. D. Soteriades, A. W. Stott, S. Moreau, T. Charroin, M. Blanchard, J. Liu, P. Faverdin, The relationship of dairy farm eco-efficiency with intensification and self-sufficiency. evidence from the french dairy sector using life cycle analysis, data envelopment analysis and partial least squares structural equation modelling. PLoS One 11, e0166445 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.E. Tallaksen, C.D. Reese, M.H. Reese, Cropping system fuel use for a diversified farm in the Midwestern United States. Appl. Eng. Agric. 35, 503 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Nacer, A. Hamidat, O. Nadjemi, M. Bey, Feasibility study of grid connected photovoltaic system in family farms for electricity generation in rural areas. Renew. Energy 96, 305 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. Schaffer, C. Duevelmeyer, Regional drivers of on-farm energy production in Bavaria. Energy Policy 95, 361 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. J.A. Bailey, P. Duinker, P. Amyotte, M. Adams, F. Khan, Measuring energy conservation on nova scotia (NS) farms: a 2004 to 2011 comparison. Energy 113, 144 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M.C. Balda, T. Furubayashi, T. Nakata, A novel approach for analyzing the food-energy nexus through on-farm energy generation. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 19, 1003 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V.J.P.D. Martinho, Output impacts of the single payment scheme in portugal: a regression with spatial effects. Outlook Agric 44, 109 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Ding, P. Pinson, Z. Hu, Y. Song, Optimal offering and operating strategies for wind-storage systems with linear decision rules. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 31, 4755 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. A. Erguido, A. Crespo Marquez, E. Castellano, and J. F. Gomez Fernandez, A Dynamic Opportunistic Maintenance Model to Maximize Energy-Based Availability While Reducing the Life Cycle Cost of Wind Farms, Renew. Energy 114, 843 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. V. J. P. D. Martinho, The Reality for Agricultural Economics Within the European Union: Stressing the Efficiency Indicators Across the Representative Farms (Springer International Publishing, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. V.J.P.D. Martinho, Insights from over 30 years of common agricultural policy in Portugal. Outlook Agric 46, 223 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Alekneviciene, B. Stareviciute, E. Alekneviciute, Evaluation of the efficiency of european union farms: a risk-adjusted return approach. Agric. Econ. 64, 241 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Ferto, Z. Bakucs, S. Bojnec, L. Latruffe, East-West European farm investment behaviour—the role of financial constraints and public support. Span. J. Agric. Res. 15, e0SC01 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  18. J. Marzec, A. Pisulewski, Measuring the efficiency of european union farms under heterogeneous technologies. Gospod. Narod.-Pol. J. Econ. 303, 111 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. N. Maraseni, S. Mushtaq, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change, Water Security and the Need for Integrated Policy Development: The Case of on-Farm Infrastructure Investment in the Australian Irrigation Sector, Environ. Res. Lett. 7, 034006 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Mushtaq, T.N. Maraseni, K. Reardon-Smith, Climate Change and Water Security: Estimating the Greenhouse Gas Costs of Achieving Water Security through Investments in Modern Irrigation Technology. Agric. Syst. 117, 78 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. I. Stavi and R. Lal, Agriculture and Greenhouse Gases, a Common Tragedy. A Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 33, 275 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. N.J. Glithero, S.J. Ramsden, P. Wilson, Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches. Agric. Syst. 109, 53 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V.J.P.D. Martinho, Socioeconomic impacts of forest fires upon Portugal: an analysis for the agricultural and forestry sectors. Sustainability 11, 2 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. B.L. Gowreesunker, S.A. Tassou, The impact of renewable energy policies on the adoption of anaerobic digesters with farm-fed wastes in Great Britain. Energies 9, 1038 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. QGIS.org, QGIS Geographic Information System. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project. https://qgis.org

  26. FADN, Agriculture—FADN : F. A. D. N.—Homepage, https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/rica/

  27. Stata, Stata: Software for Statistics and Data Science, https://www.stata.com/

  28. StataCorp, Stata 15 Base Reference Manual (Stata Press, College Station, TX, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. StataCorp, Stata Statistical Software: Release 15 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, TX, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by National Funds through the FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology, I.P., within the scope of the project Refª UIDB/00681/2020. Furthermore we would like to thank the CERNAS Research Centre and the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu for their support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vítor João Pereira Domingues Martinho .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Martinho, V.J.P.D. (2021). Characteristics of Farms in the European Union: Relationships Between Energy Costs and Other Variables. In: Energy Costs and Farm Characteristics in the European Union. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75839-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75839-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75838-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75839-4

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics