Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Immediate and Early Implantation Versus Delayed Implantation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Innovative Perspectives in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery

  • 1679 Accesses

Abstract

Immediate and early dental implant placements are new approaches introduced to enhance some features of the conventional delayed protocols, such as shortening of the total treatment time in edentulous patients, hard and soft tissue preservation in the extraction socket, and improvement of esthetics. In this chapter, we will discuss the clinical indications and outcomes of these protocols.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Koh RU, Rudek I, Wang H-L. Immediate implant placement: positives and negatives. Implant Dent. 2010;19(2):98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kois JC. Predictable single tooth peri-implant esthetics: five diagnostic keys. Compend Contin Educ Dent (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2001;22(3):199.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kao RT, Fagan MC, Conte GJ. Thick vs. thin gingival biotypes: a key determinant in treatment planning for dental implants. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2008;36(3):193–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Funato A, Salama MA, Ishikawa T, Garber DA, Salama H. Timing, positioning, and sequential staging in esthetic implant therapy: a four-dimensional perspective. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007;27(4):313–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bhola M, Neely AL, Kolhatkar S. Immediate implant placement: clinical decisions, advantages, and disadvantages. J Prosthodont Implant Esthet Reconstr Dent. 2008;17(7):576–81.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nemcovsky CE, Artzi Z, Moses O, Gelernter I. Healing of marginal defects at implants placed in fresh extraction sockets or after 4–6 weeks of healing: a comparative study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002;13(4):410–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tarnow DP, Magner AW, Fletcher P. The effect of the distance from the contact point to the crest of bone on the presence or absence of the interproximal dental papilla. J Periodontol. 1992;63(12):995–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gastaldo JF, Cury PR, Sendyk WR. Effect of the vertical and horizontal distances between adjacent implants and between a tooth and an implant on the incidence of interproximal papilla. J Periodontol. 2004;75(9):1242–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Schropp L, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Bone healing following immediate versus delayed placement of titanium implants into extraction sockets: a prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(2):189–99.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen ST, Wilson TG Jr, Hammerle C. Immediate or early placement of implants following tooth extraction: review of biologic basis, clinical procedures, and outcomes. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(Suppl):12–25.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schropp L, Isidor F. Timing of implant placement relative to tooth extraction. J Oral Rehabil. 2008;35:33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Botticelli D, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Hard-tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites. J Clin Periodontol. 2004;31(10):820–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quirynen M, Van Assche N, Botticelli D, Berglundh T. How does the timing of implant placement to extraction affect outcome? Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE): quality-assessed Reviews [Internet]. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (UK); 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lindeboom JA, Tjiook Y, Kroon FH. Immediate placement of implants in periapical infected sites: a prospective randomized study in 50 patients. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101(6):705–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanz I, Garcia-Gargallo M, Herrera D, Martin C, Figuero E, Sanz M. Surgical protocols for early implant placement in post-extraction sockets: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23:67–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Buser D, Halbritter S, Hart C, Bornstein MM, Grütter L, Chappuis V, et al. Early implant placement with simultaneous guided bone regeneration following single-tooth extraction in the esthetic zone: 12-month results of a prospective study with 20 consecutive patients. J Periodontol. 2009;80(1):152–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Immediate and early implant loading protocols: a literature review of clinical studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94(3):242–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Polyzos IP, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: dental implants in fresh extraction sockets (immediate, immediate-delayed and delayed implants). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(9).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bassir SH, El Kholy K, Chen CY, Lee KH, Intini G. Outcome of early dental implant placement versus other dental implant placement protocols: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2019;90(5):493–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartz-Arad D, Chaushu G. The ways and wherefores of immediate placement of implants into fresh extraction sites: a literature review. J Periodontol. 1997;68(10):915–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen ST, Buser D. Clinical and esthetic outcomes of implants placed in postextraction sites. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009;24 Suppl:186–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A. Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15(4):498–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Shervin Shafiei

Authors
  1. Shervin Shafiei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shervin Shafiei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

    Mark R. Stevens

  2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA

    Shohreh Ghasemi

  3. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

    Reza Tabrizi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shafiei, S. (2021). Immediate and Early Implantation Versus Delayed Implantation. In: Stevens, M.R., Ghasemi, S., Tabrizi, R. (eds) Innovative Perspectives in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75750-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75750-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75749-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75750-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation