Abstract
Residual biomass from agricultural produce can be used to generate energy in various forms, as well as chemicals. Availability for residual biomass across Mexico from various crops is presented in this chapter using a Geographic Information System (GIS) that allows to pinpoint this availability at the municipal level, as well as considering several restrictions to be imposed to adequately select sites to install processing facilities. Agave, barley, maize, pecan nut, rice, sugar cane, sorghum, and wheat were the crops selected due to its large producing volume in Mexico. Base processing technology is biomass gasification, with sub-stoichiometric air or with steam, to render a synthesis gas to be further processed. Secondary processing technologies assessed are: direct combustion to generate electricity and refrigeration (through combustion turbine and steam turbines), producing Fischer-Tropsch liquids, or producing ammonia or urea or methanol. Proposing the specific processing sites throughout Mexico and concluding that producing in some facilities electricity and Fischer-Tropsch liquids is a combination that has adequate profit.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- BTL:
-
Biomass to Liquids
- FTL:
-
Fischer-Tropsch Liquids
- GIS:
-
Geographic Information Systems
- GTL:
-
Gas to Liquids
- MILP:
-
Mixed-Integer Linear Programming
- NPP:
-
Net Primary Productivity
- ROCE:
-
Return on Capital Employed
- USA:
-
United States of America
References
Aspen Plus (n.d.) Available at: https://www.aspentech.com/en/products/engineering/aspen-plus. Accessed 21 Jan 2020
Anttila P et al (2015) ‘Availability, supply technology and costs of residual forest biomass for energy—a case study in northern China. Biomass Bioenergy Elsevier Ltd 83:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.09.012
Boerrigter H (May 2006) ‘Economy of biomass-to-liquids (BTL) plants, An engineering assessment’. Available at: www.ecn.nl/biomass p 29
Brahma A et al (2016) ‘GIS based planning of a biomethanation power plant in Assam, India.’ Renew Sustain Energ Rev Elsevier 62:596–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.009
Chen JCP (1991) Manual del azúcar de caña: para fabricantes de azúcar de caña y químicos especializados. México D.F.: Limusa. Available at: https://books.google.com.mx/books/about/Manual_del_azúcar_de_caña.html?id=7twjPQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y. Accessed 5 Oct 2018
Corella J, Orı A, Aznar P (1998) ‘Biomass gasification with air in fluidized bed: reforming of the’. pp 4617–4624
Caputo AC et al (2005) Economics of biomass energy utilization in combustion and gasification plants: effects of logistic variables. Biomass Bioenerg 28:35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.04.009
Corella J, Sanz A (2005) Modeling circulating fluidized bed biomass gasifiers. A pseudo-rigorous model for stationary state. Fuel Process Technol 86(9):1021–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2004.11.013
Corella J, Toledo JM, Molina G (2007) A review on dual fluidized-bed biomass gasifiers. Ind Eng Chem Res 46(21):6831–6839. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0705507
Corella J, Toledo JM, Molina G (2008) Biomass gasification with pure steam in fluidised bed: 12 variables that affect the effectiveness of the biomass gasifier. Int J Oil, Gas Coal Technol 1:194. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOGCT.2008.016739
CONEVAL (2011) ‘Multidimensional measurement of poverty in Mexico: an economic wellbeing and social rights approach’
Cutz L et al (2016) Assessment of biomass energy sources and technologies: the case of Central America. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 58:1411–1431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.322
CENACE (2018) Electricity prices
Farm-Futures (2018) Ammonia prices, Farm Futures. Available at: https://www.farmfutures.com/story-weekly-fertilizer-review-0-30765
Graham RL, English BC, Noon CE (2000) A geographic information system-based modeling system for evaluating the cost of delivered energy crop feedstock. Biomass Bioenerg 18(4):309–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00098-7
Girard P, Fallot A, Dauriac F (2002) Review of existing and emerging technologies for the large scale production of biofuels and identification of promising innovations for developing countries, Centre de coopération internationale en recherche agronomique pour le développemen
Gonzales DS, Searcy SW (2017) ‘GIS-based allocation of herbaceous biomass in biorefineries and depots.’ Biomass Bioenergy. Pergamon 97:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2016.12.009
Hofbauer H, et al (2002) ‘Biomass CHP plant güssing—a success story’, expert meeting on pyrolysis and gasification of biomass and waste. Available at: http://members.aon.at/biomasse/strassbourg.pdf
Haase M, Rösch C, Ketzer D (2016) GIS-based assessment of sustainable crop residue potentials in European regions. Biomass Bioenerg 86:156–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.01.020
Investopedia (n.d.) Value added definition. Available at: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/valueadded.asp. Accessed 21 Oct 2019
Iñiguez-Covarrubias G et al (2001) Utilization of by-products from the tequila industry. Part 2: potential value of Agave tequilana Weber azul leaves. Biores Technol 77(2):101–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00167-X
ICIS (2006) ICIS Prices. Available at: https://www.icis.com/chemicals/channel-info-chemicals-a-z/
IntraTec (2016) ‘Methanol E11A—economic analysis for different capacities—2016Q3’. IntraTec
INEGI (April 2017) Carta de Vegetación y Uso del Suelo, Serie VI Instituto Nacional de Geografía y Estadística. http://www.inegi.org.mx/geo/contenidos/recnat/usosuelo/defaults.aspx201117
IntraTec (2017) ‘Urea-e11a-economic-analysis-for-different-capacities-2017-q4’. IntraTec
Ketzer D, Rösch C, Haase M (2017) Assessment of sustainable grassland biomass potentials for energy supply in northwest Europe. Biomass Bioenerg 100:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.03.009
Li XT et al (2004) Biomass gasification in a circulating fluidized bed. Biomass Bioenerg 26:171–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00084-9
Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31(4):575–584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.005
Lin T et al (2015) ‘CyberGIS-enabled decision support platform for biomass supply chain optimization.’ Environ Modell Softw Elsevier Ltd 70:138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.018
Lozano FJ, Lozano R (2018) Assessing the potential sustainability benefits of agricultural residues: biomass conversion to syngas for energy generation or to chemicals production. J Clean Prod 172:4162–4169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.037
Milbrandt A (2005) A geographic perspective on the current biomass resource availability in the United States a geographic perspective on the current biomass resource availability in the United States, National renewable energy laboratory, contract no. DE-AC36-GO10337. NREL/TP-560-39181
Makan A (2013) Gas to liquids: launch pads proffered for small-scale GTL plants, financial times. Available at: https://www.ft.com/content/eb5105e8-a046-11e2-88b6-00144feabdc0. Accessed 13 Nov 2019
Nikolaou A, Remrova M, Jeliazkov I (2003) Biomass availability in Europe, EU Energy
National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (2012) Report of poverty in Mexico 2010: the country, its states and its municipalities
Pordesimo LO, Edens WC, Sokhansanj S (2004) Distribution of aboveground biomass in corn stover. Biomass Bioenerg 26:337–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00124-7
Pröll T et al. (2006) ‘Technical and economic potential of novel technologies for thermal biomass utilization’. pp 1–26
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo (2015) ‘Índice de Desarrollo Humano para las entidades federativas, México 2015’, Pnud, p 24. Available at: http://www.mx.undp.org/content/dam/mexico/docs/Publicaciones/PublicacionesReduccionPobreza/InformesDesarrolloHumano/PNUD_boletinIDH.pdf
Paiano A, Lagioia G (2016) Energy potential from residual biomass towards meeting the EU renewable energy and climate targets. The Italian case. Energy Policy. Elsevier 91:161–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.12.039
Rauch R (n. d.) ‘Indirectly heated gasifiers—the case of the guessing reactor’. 2(1)
Reed T, Das A (Mar 1988) ‘Handbook of biomass downdraft gasifier engine systems’. 148
Reyes Muro L, Camacho Villa TC, Guevara Hernández F (2013) Rastrojos. Manejo, Uso y Mercado en el Centro y Sur de México. México DF
Sustainable energy for all|SEforALL (n. d.). Available at: https://www.seforall.org/. Accessed 6 June 2019
Shadle LJ et al (2002) ‘Circulating fluid-bed technology for advanced power systems’
Spath PL, Dayton DC (2003) ‘Preliminary screening—technical and economic assessment of synthesis gas to fuels and chemicals with emphasis on the potential for biomass-derived syngas’. Natl Renew Energ Lab (December), 1–160. https://doi.org/10.2172/15006100
Spath P, et al (2005) Biomass to hydrogen production detailed design and economics utilizing the Battelle Columbus laboratory indirectly heated gasifier
Smil V (2008) Energy in nature and society: general energetics of complex systems: Vaclav Smil: 8580000793468: Amazon.com: Books. MIT Press. Available at: https://www.amazon.com/Vaclav-Smil-Society-General-Energetics/dp/B008UYYTL4/ref=sr_1_24?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1540332081&sr=1-24&keywords=smil%2C+vaclav. Accessed 23 Oct 2018
SAGARPA (2014a) Atlas agroalimentario 2014. México: secretaría de agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación
SAGARPA (2014b) SIAP—Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera» Datos Abiertos, Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación. Available at: http://www.siap.gob.mx/datos-abiertos/. Accessed 19 April 2016
Sahoo K et al (2016) ‘GIS-based biomass assessment and supply logistics system for a sustainable biorefinery: a case study with cotton stalks in the Southeastern US.’ Appl Energ Elsevier 182:260–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APENERGY.2016.08.114
Santibanez-Aguilar JE, et al (2018) ‘Facilities location for residual biomass production system using geographic information system under uncertainty’. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b03303
Santibanez-Aguilar JE et al (2019) Sequential use of geographic information system and mathematical programming for the optimal planning for energy production system from residual biomass. Ind Eng Chem Res 58(35):15818–15837
Tijmensen MJA et al (2002) Exploration of the possibilities for production of fischer–tropsch liquids and power via biomass gasification. Biomass Bioenerg 23:129–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00037-5
Vukašinović V, Gordić D (2016) Optimization and GIS-based combined approach for the determination of the most cost-effective investments in biomass sector. Appl Energy 178:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.06.037
Wang L et al (2008) Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 32(7):573–581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.12.007
Zhang F et al (2016) ‘Decision support system integrating GIS with simulation and optimisation for a biofuel supply chain.’ Renew Energy Elsevier Ltd 85:740–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.07.041
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lozano, F.J., Lozano-García, D.F., Castellanos, A.M., Flores-Tlacuahuac, A. (2022). Residual Biomass Use for Energy Generation. In: Lozano, F.J., Mendoza, A., Molina, A. (eds) Energy Issues and Transition to a Low Carbon Economy. Strategies for Sustainability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75661-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75661-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75660-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75661-1
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)