Skip to main content

Assessing the Proposed Volume of Recreational Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Moscow’s Urban Protected Areas

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Development of Urban Green Infrastructure (SSC 2020)

Part of the book series: Springer Geography ((SPRINGERGEOGR))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 635 Accesses

Abstract

The importance of urban protected areas is increasing all over the world because of urbanization. Protected areas in cities provide many ecosystem services; one of the most important is daily recreation. The study is devoted to the recreational ecosystem services of urban protected areas in Moscow. The article proposes an approach to assess the proposed volume of the recreational ecosystem services on the basis of the recreational development and recreational potential of the protected area. The study takes into account various types of recreation and the corresponding infrastructure facilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bukvareva, E.N., Sviridova, T.V., (eds.) Ecosystem services of Russia: prototype national report, vol. 2. Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Accounting Principles in Russia. English version of the report published originally in Russian in 2020, BCC Press. Moscow (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chizhova, V.P.:. Recreational Load in Recreation Areas. Timber industry (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fischer, L.K., Honold, J., Botzat, A., Brinkmeyer, D., Cvejić, R., Delshammar, T., Lafortezza, R.: Recreational ecosystem services in European cities: sociocultural and geographical contexts matter for park use. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 455–467 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Naturvårdsverket. Guide to valuing ecosystem services. Report 6854, November 2018 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kulczyk, S., Woźniak, E., Derek, M.: Landscape, facilities and visitors: an integrated model of recreational ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 31, 491–501 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.02.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lankia, T., Kopperoinen, L., Pouta, E., Neuvonen, M.: Valuing recreational ecosystem service flow in Finland. J. Outdoor Recreat. Tour. 10, 14–28 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2015.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lupp, G., Förster, B., Kantelberg, V., Markmann, T., Naumann, J., Honert, C., Pauleit, S.: Assessing the recreation value of urban woodland using the ecosystem service approach in two forests in the Munich metropolitan region. Sustainability 8(11), 1156 (2016). http://doi.org/10.3390/su8111156

  8. Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J.P., Termansen, M., Bidoglio, G.: Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Ind. 45, 371–385 (2014). http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018

  9. Peña, L., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Onaindia, M.: Mapping recreation supply and demand using an ecological and a social evaluation approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 13, 108–118 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshimura, N., Hiura, T.: Demand and supply of cultural ecosystem services: Use of geotagged photos to map the aesthetic value of landscapes in Hokkaido. Ecosyst. Serv. 24, 68–78 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Decree of the Government of the Moscow Region of December 23, 2013 N 1098/55 On the approval of « Instructions. Regional park standard of the Moscow region » (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Order of the Ministry of Sports of Russia of 05/25/2016 N 586 (ed. Of 11/21/2016) On the approval of Methodological recommendations for the development of networks of physical culture and sports organizations and the provision of the population with the services of such organizations»

    Google Scholar 

  13. Department of Nature Management and Environmental Protection of the city of Moscow. http://www.dpioos.ru/eco/ru/oopt

  14. Mospriroda. https://mospriroda.ru/

  15. Open data Moscow City Government. https://data.mos.ru/

  16. Velomoskva. https://mos.bike/

  17. Yandex.Maps. https://yandex.ru/maps

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aleksandriiskaia, K., Klimanova, O. (2021). Assessing the Proposed Volume of Recreational Ecosystem Services: A Case Study of Moscow’s Urban Protected Areas. In: Vasenev, V., et al. Advanced Technologies for Sustainable Development of Urban Green Infrastructure. SSC 2020. Springer Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75285-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics