Abstract
When trying to take sex and gender into account in participatory research, the challenges of knowledge users and researchers can be quite different. This communication aims to present perspectives of both stakeholders and researchers involved in occupational health intervention research (IR) studies about the facilitators and obstacles to considering sex and gender throughout the whole study, from the early stages to the final dissemination. Interviews were conducted with co-researchers and partners involved in seven occupational health IR projects integrating sex or gender considerations to some degree. The interviews were transcribed, and a qualitative content analysis was made. The obstacles and facilitators to sex/gender conscious interventions perceived by the investigators and the partners were then compared to bring out similarities and differences. Among the commonalities, not addressing sex and gender issues head on, a personal interest for s/g questions, the complexity related to studying s/g, the socio-political context were themes discussed by both researchers and partners. Partners also found that a positive relationship with the research team and an initial interest of the community or workplace for the s/g aspect of the project made the process easier. However, the facilitators or obstacles may differ from one context to another and it is mandatory for researchers to consider the characteristics of the community in which the intervention takes place, and the sensitivity to s/g matters in order to minimize resistance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Graham, I.D., Kothari, A., McCutcheon, C., et al.: Moving knowledge into action for more effective practice, programs and policy: protocol for a research program on integrated knowledge translation. Implement Sci. 13(22), 1–15 (2018)
World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/health-topics/gender#tab=tab_1. Accessed 07 Feb 2021
Laberge, M., Blanchette-Luong, V., Blanchard, A., Messing, K., et al.: Impacts of considering sex and gender during intervention studies in occupational health: researchers’ perspectives. Appl. Ergon. 82, 102960 (2020)
Messing, K., Punnett, L., Bond, M., Alexanderson, K., Pyle, J., Zahm, S., Wegman, D., Stock, S.R., de Grosbois, S.: Be the fairest of them all: challenges and recommendations for the treatment of gender in occupational health research. Am. J. Ind. Med. 43(6), 618–29 (2003)
Riel, J., Major, M.-E.: The challenges of mobilizing workers on gender issues: lessons from two studies on the occupational health of teachers in québec. New Solutions J. Environ. Occup. Health Policy 27(3), 284–303 (2017)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Poupart-Monette, V., Laberge, M., Genier, ML., Riel, J., Messing, K., Lederer, V. (2021). Facilitators and Obstacles to Sex/Gender-Conscious Intervention-Research on Occupational Health: Researchers and Partners Perspectives. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_60
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_60
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74604-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74605-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)