Abstract
We trained M.Sc. students learning a work activity-centered approach to ergonomics to use a sex- and gender-sensitive lens. Such a lens is useful for ergonomic analysis because gender can affect exposure to some workplace health determinants. Sex and gender training was given in two sessions during students' final year, as part of an intervention internship. We present here three categories for potential sex and gender inclusion in an ergonomics intervention. These categories are: (1) investigating and modeling work activity by integrating sex and gender; (2) implementing solutions with consideration of sex and gender; (3) exchanging with stakeholders on sex/gender issues. We propose that these categories could be useful for examining work activity-centered ergonomic interventions. Student questionnaires revealed that they were satisfied with this training, thought it useful for their practice, and felt that they were well-trained. They rated the training as important and ethically relevant for all ergonomists. However, students did not feel they integrated sex and gender enough in their interventions and they perceived some obstacles to integration. Our results nevertheless support the idea that improving knowledge around sex and gender could be a lever for more inclusive and health-centered ergonomics interventions.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
St-Vincent, M., Vézina, N., Bellemare, M., Denis, D., Ledoux, É., Imbeau, D.: Ergonomic Intervention. IRSST, Montréal (2014)
Laberge, M., Blanchette-Luong, V., Blanchard, A., Sultan-Taïeb, H., Riel, J., Lederer, V., Major, M.-È.: Impacts of considering sex and gender during intervention studies in occupational health: Researchers’ perspectives. Appl. Ergon. 102960(82), 1–9 (2020)
Vézina, N., Chatigny, C., Calvet, B.: L’intervention ergonomique : Que fait-on des caractéristiques personnelles comme le sexe et le genre ? Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé 18(2), 1–19 (2016)
Coutarel, F., Caroly, S., Vézina, N., Daniellou, F.: Marge de manoeuvre situationnelle et pouvoir d’agir : Des concepts à l’intervention ergonomique. Le Travail Humain 78(1), 29 (2015)
Riel, J., Bernstein, S., Cox, R., Laberge, M., Lederer, V., Messing, K., Saint-Charles, J.: Perspectives interdisciplinaires sur les inégalités sociales et de genre en santé au travail : constats et défis pour l’action. In: 86e congrès de l’ACFAS, Chicoutimi (2018)
Légaré, F., Borduas, F., Freitas, A., Jacques, A., Godin, G., Luconi, F., Grimshaw, J.: Development of a simple 12-item theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development on clinical behavioral intentions. PLoS One 9(3), 1–10 (2014)
Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)/Institute of gender and Health (# IGK 153464 / GESTE Team).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Inigo, M., Laberge, M., Chadoin, M., Messing, K. (2021). Training M.Sc. Students in Ergonomics to Integrate a Sex/Gender-Sensitive Approach. In: Black, N.L., Neumann, W.P., Noy, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 21st Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2021). IEA 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 220. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74605-6_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-74604-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-74605-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)