Abstract
Biophilia, biophilic design, bio-inspired and bio-design are design genres that adopted nature and biological elements as part of design processes. With the spread use of natural elements in design nowadays, from the analogical approach to the application of the biological materials in design brought up a different connotation towards the diverse use of nature in everyday life. This paper discusses the background knowledge of Biophilia, biophilic design, bio-inspired and bio-design and the application of biological materials in urban environments, especially for home. As part of a larger project on the application of biological materials in everyday products, this study investigates the emotional design and perception, while identifying the purposes of biological materials which incorporated into designs or systems. Data from 158 potential consumers were collected in an online survey specifically designed for this study, differentiating between design and non-design participants. Interesting findings are that more than 65% of non-design respondents are not aware of the terms biophilia and biophilic design, but they are familiar with the terms bio-inspired and bio-design. On the other hand, the potential consumers which are from non-design and design background as well agreed that having biological materials indoors, can a) help to release stress, b) create awareness of nature and ecological impact, c) can foster a sense of care, and d) can be educational.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albaum, G.: The Likert scale revisited: an alternate version. J. Mark. Res. Soc. 39(2), 331–332 (1997)
Arvay, C.G.: The biophilia effect: a scientific and spiritual exploration of the healing bond between humans and nature. Sounds True, Canada (2018)
Balling, J.D., Falk, J.H.: Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environ. Behav. 14(1), 5–28 (1982)
Bartczak, C., Dunbar, B., Bohren, L.: Incorporating biophilic design through living walls: the decision-making process. Construct. Green. Soc. Struct. Sustain. 307 (2013)
Collin, P.: Dictionary of Environment & Ecology, 5th edn. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc (2004)
Eckardt, M.H.: Fromm’s humanistic ethics and the role of the prophet. A Prophetic Analyst: Erich Fromm’s Contributions to Psychoanalysis, pp. 151–165 (1996)
Frumkin, H.: Beyond toxicity: human health and the natural environment. Am. J. Prev. Med. 20(3), 234–240 (2001)
Grinde, B., Patil, G.G.: Biophilia: does visual contact with nature impact on health and well-being? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 6(9), 2332–2343 (2009)
Gunawardena, K., Steemers, K.: Living walls in indoor environments. Building and Environment (2018)
Gruber, P., Bruckner, D., Hellmich, C., Schmiedmayer, H.-B., Stachelberger, H., Gebeshuber, I.C.: Biomimetics- Materials, Structures and Processes: Examples. Ideas and Case Studies. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Hoffmann, A.O., et al.: Dog-assisted intervention significantly reduces anxiety in hospitalized patients with major depression. Eur. J. Integr. Med. 1(3), 145–148 (2009)
Howell, A., Dopko, R., Passmore, Holli-Anne., Buro, K.: Nature connectedness: associations with well-being and mindfulness. Pers. Ind. Differ. 51(2), 166–171 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037
Huelat, B.J.: The wisdom of biophilia-nature in healing environments. J. Green Build. 3(3), 23–35 (2008)
Johns, R.: Likert items and scales. Survey question bank: methods fact sheet 1 (2010)
Johnson, N.: Biophilic design benefits (2014). https://www.architectureanddesign.com.au/features/features-articles/why-biophilic-architecture-works-five-reasons-and?mid=7603c81e3d&utm_source=Cirrus+Media+Newsletters&utm_campaign=9a3dbdbe88-Architecture+and+Design+Newsletter+-+201&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_fe913f1856-9a3dbdbe88-59078485. Accessed 2014
Kaplan, S.: The restorative benefits of nature: toward an integrative framework. J. Environ. Psychol. 15(3), 169–182 (1995)
Kellert, S.R., Heerwagen, J., Mador, M.: Biophilic Design: The Theory. Science and Practice of Bringing Buildings to Life. Wiley, Hoboken (2008)
Magnan, R.A.: Discover Bio-design Thinking: Adopting Visual Images to Transform Our Information Processing Abilities. Xlibris Corporation (2018)
Matell, M.S., Jacoby, J.: Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-Scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. J. Appl. Psychol. 56(6), 506 (1972)
Montana-Hoyos, C.: BIO-ID4S: Biomimicry in industrial design for sustainability. VDM-Germany (2010)
Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: The basic emotional impact of environments. Percept. Mot. Skills 38(1), 283–301 (1974)
Myers, W.: Bio design: nature, science creativity. Revised and expanded version. Thames and Hudson (2018)
O’Haire, M.: Companion animals and human health: benefits, challenges, and the road ahead. J. Vet. Behav. Clin. Appl. Res. 5(5), 226–234 (2010)
Parsaee, M., Demers, C.M., Hébert, M., Lalonde, J.F., Potvin, A.: A photobiological approach to biophilic design in extreme climates. Build. Environ. 154, 211–226 (2019)
Rosenbaum, M.S., Ramirez, G.C., Camino, J.R.: A dose of nature and shopping: the restorative potential of biophilic lifestyle center designs. J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 40, 66–73 (2018)
Sayuti, N.A.A., Montana-Hoyos, C., Bonollo, E.: A study of furniture design incorporating living organisms with particular reference to biophilic and emotional design criteria. Acad. J. Sci. 4(1), 75–106 (2015)
Sayuti, N.A.A., Ahmed-Kristensen, S.: Understanding emotional responses and perception within new creative practices of biological materials. In: Conference proceeding, the Sixth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2020). University of Oulu, Finland (2020)
Sayuti, N.A.A., Sommer, B., Ahmed-Kristensen, S.: Identifying the purposes of biological materials in everyday designs. Environ.-Behav. Proc. J. 5(15). Accepted. Conference on AMEABRA International Virtual Conference on Environment-Behaviour Studies, 2nd Series (2020). https://amerabra.org/aivce-bs-2-2020shahalam/
Sayuti, N.A.A., Montana-Hoyos, C., Bonollo, E.: Biophilic design: why do designers incorporate living organisms in furniture design? In: Conference Proceeding, the Fifth International Conference on Design Creativity (ICDC2018). University of Bath, UK (2018)
Simaika, J.P., Samways, M.J.: Biophilia as a universal ethic for conserving biodiversity. Conserv. Biol. 24(3), 903–906 (2010)
Terrapin Bright Green: 14 Patterns of biophilic design: Improving health & well-being in the built environment. New York, USA (2012)
Terrapin Bright Green: The Economic of biophilia: why designing with nature in mind makes financial sense. New York, USA (2014)
Thorpe, A.: The Designer’s Atlas of Sustainability. Island Press (2007)
Ulrich, R.S.: Natural versus urban scenes some psychophysiological effects. Environ. Behav. 13(5), 523–556 (1981)
Wilson, E.O.: Biophilia. Harvard University Press (1984)
Yin, J., Zhu, S., MacNaughton, P., Allen, J.G., Spengler, J.D.: Physiological and cognitive performance of exposure to biophilic indoor environment. Build. Environ. 132, 255–262 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sayuti, N.‘.A., Sommer, B., Ahmed-Kristensen, S. (2021). Bio-related Design Genres: A Survey on Familiarity and Potential Applications. In: Brooks, A., Brooks, E.I., Jonathan, D. (eds) Interactivity and Game Creation. ArtsIT 2020. Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering, vol 367. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73426-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73426-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73425-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73426-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)