Abstract
In Chap. 5, we introduced a conceptual model of migration culture. It was emphasized that the formation of such a culture is a function of environmental forces or factors, and values. This chapter builds upon the preceding thesis of a migration culture in Lithuania. Societal values are analysed via a synthesis of large-scale cross-national studies on values that have included Lithuania. A picture of Lithuania, relative to other countries, emerges that paints a picture of a culture that has, over decades, evolved into one that is low on tolerance, openness to change and optimism among other aspects, combining into a “perfect storm” of values at the societal-level conducive to a culture of migration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The ESS included a series of questions from the Portrait Value Questionnaire (Schwartz et al., 2001), consisting of individual-level questions about the importance placed on desirable goals, that, when aggregated to country level, reflect societal-level values.
- 2.
Schwartz also includes the dimensions Intellectual Autonomy and Hierarchy. These have not been included in this summary, as no reliable data for Lithuania are available. In a replication study by Ralston et al. (2011) in 50 societies, including Lithuania, internal consistency problems were found for these two dimensions.
References
Arikan, G., & Bloom, P. B. N. (2012). The influence of societal values on attitudes towards immigration. International Political Sciences Review, 34(2), 210–226.
Bates, W. (2014). Where are emancipative values taking us? Policy, 30(2), 12–21.
European Migration Network. (2016). https://123.emn.lt/. Accessed 24 March 2020.
European Social Survey. (2016). ESS8-2016 Documentation report. Edition 2.0. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, NSD—Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC.
Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., & Sachs, J. D. (2018). World happiness report 2018. Sustainable Development Solutions Network.
Hofstede, G. (1980a). Culture’s consequences. International differences in work-related values. Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1980b). Motivation, leadership, and organization: Do American theories apply abroad? Organizational Dynamics, 9, 42–63.
Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. Sage.
Inglehart, R. C., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.
Inglehart, R., Haerpfer, C., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano, J., Lagos, M., Norris, P., Ponarin, E., & Puranen, B., et al. (Eds.). (2014). World values survey: Round three—Country-pooled datafile version. www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV3.jsp. JD Systems Institute.
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change and democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Kumpikaite-Valiuniene, V. (2019). Endangered Lithuania. Migration Letters, 16(4), 637–646.
Mockaitis, A. I. (2002). The influence of national cultural values on management attitudes: A comparative study across three countries (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vilnius University.
Pessin, L., & Arpino, B. (2018). Navigating between two cultures: Immigrants’ gender attitudes toward working women. Demographic Research, 38(35), 967–1016.
Ralston, D. A., Egri, C. P., Mockaitis, A. I., et al. (2011). A twenty-first century assessment of values across the global workforce. Journal of Business Ethics, 104, 1–31.
Schiefer, D. (2013). Cultural values and group-related attitudes: A comparison of individuals with and without migration background across 24 countries. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 44(2), 245–262.
Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. In U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi, & G. Yoon (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: Theory, method, and applications (pp. 85–119). Sage.
Schwartz, S. H., Melech, G., Lehmann, A., Burgess, S., & Harris, M. (2001). Extending the cross-cultural validity of the theory of basic human values with a different method of measurement. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 519–542.
Schwartz, S. H. (2006). A theory of cultural value orientations: Explication and applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2–3), 137–182.
Smith, P. B., Peterson, M. F., & Schwartz, S. H. (2002). Cultural values, sources of guidance, and their relevance to managerial behaviour: A 47-nation study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 33(2), 188–208.
Welzel, C. (2013). Freedom rising: Human empowerment and the quest for emancipation. Cambridge University Press.
World Values Survey. https://www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Accessed 1 August 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumpikaitė -Valiūnienė, V., Liubinienė, V., Žičkutė, I., Duobienė, J., Mockaitis, A.I., Mihi-Ramirez, A. (2021). A Kaleidoscope of Societal Values in Lithuania: Migration Perspectives. In: Migration Culture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73014-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-73014-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-73013-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-73014-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)