Skip to main content

Interactions Between Local Government and Voluntary Organizations: Theoretical Perspectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Voluntary and Public Sector Collaboration in Scandinavia

Abstract

This chapter develops an analytical model suited for empirical investigations of the interactions between local government and voluntary organizations. Public authorities and voluntary organizations interact through conflictual, complementary or cooperative relationships. We contend that, in addition to macro-institutional structures, that is the welfare state, meso-level institutional structures characterizing different policy fields define the modalities of interactions between public authorities and voluntary organizations. The authors identify two institutional regimes of voluntary sector-public sector relations—competitive pluralism and participatory governance—characterized by the ways they institutionalize the role played by voluntary organizations in policymaking and policy implementation and the degree of symmetry and hierarchy characterizing the relationship in these two arenas of interaction. Further, the authors show that these two regimes correspond to the mobilization of different types of power and trust in the interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford, J. (2009). Engaging public sector clients: From service-delivery to co-production. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alford, J. (2014). The multiple facets of co-production: Building on the work of Elinor Ostrom. Public Management Review, 16(3), 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.806578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 543–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvidson, M., Johansson, H., Johansson, S., & Norfeldt, M. (2018). Local society regimes: Liberal, corporatist and civil society regimes in Swedish metropolitan cities. Voluntary Sector Review, 9(1), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2016). Sociologie Générale. Volume 2. Cours au Collège de France, 1983–1986. Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. D. J. (1992). An invitation to reflexive sociology. Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2006). Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services: An introduction. Public Management Review, 8(4), 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandsen, T., Steen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2018). Co-production and co-creation. Engaging citizens in public services. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, P. M., & Rommetvedt, H. (1999). From corporatism to lobbyism? Parliaments, executives, and organized interests in Denmark and Norway. Scandinavian Political Studies, 22(3), 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1988). The firm, the market and the law. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (1991). Shaping the political arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P., & Powel, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in institutional fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A., & Ewert, B. (2015). Approaches and instruments in local welfare systems: Innovation, adoption and adaptation. Comparative Report of the Welfare Innovations at the Local Level in Favour of Cohesion (WILCO) Research Project. http://www.wilcoproject.eu/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/Comparative-Report-Social-Innovations1.pdf

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2011). Toward a general theory of strategic action fields. Sociological Theory, 29(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H. (1980). The role of nonprofit enterprise. Yale Law Journal, 89(3), 835–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2000). Leadership in the shaping and implementation of collaboration agendas: How things happen in a (not quite) joined-up world. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(6), 1159–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klenk, T., & Pavolini, E. (Eds.). (2015). Restructuring welfare governance. Marketization, managerialism and welfare state professionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhnle, S., & Selle, P. (1992). Government and voluntary organizations: A relational perspective. In S. Kuhnle & P. Selle (Eds.), Government and voluntary organizations. A relational perspective (pp. 1–33). Avebury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, D. (2012). From “Big government” to “Big governance”? In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M., & Rokkan, S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In S. M. Lipset & S. Rokkan (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignment: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. Wiley and Sons Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, T. (1986). The sources of social power, Volume I. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marwell, N. P., & Brown, M. (2020). Towards a governance framework for government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell & P. Bromley (Eds.), The nonprofit sector: A research handbook (3rd ed.). Sandford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Najam, A. (2000). The four C’s of government – Third sector relations. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 10(4), 375–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2004). The cross-cutting review of the voluntary sector: Where next for local government voluntary sector relationships? Regional Studies, 38(5), 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2008). Polycentric systems as one approach for solving collective action problems. Research Paper No. 2008-11-02, School of Environmental and Public Affairs, Indiana University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E., Parks, R. B., Whitaker, G. P., & Percy, S. L. (1978). The public service production process: A framework for analyzing police services. Policy Studies Journal, 7, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pestoff, V., Brandsen, T., & Verschuere, B. (Eds.). (2012). New public governance, the third sector and co-production. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, J. (Ed.). (2000). Debating governance. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ran, B., & Qi, H. (2019). The entangled twins: Power and trust in collaborative governance. Administration & Society, 51(4), 607–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy Networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M. (Ed.). (2002). The tools of government. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3), 213–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2008). Institutions and organizations. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selle, P. (1993). Voluntary organisations and the welfare state: The case of Norway. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 4(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R. (2007). NGOS and contracting. In E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn Jr., & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Grønbjerg, K. A. (2006). Scope and theory of government-nonprofit relations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (pp. 221–242). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. R., & Lipsky, M. (1993). Nonprofits for hire. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, R. (2006). Economic theories of nonprofit organizations. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The nonprofit sector. A research handbook (pp. 117–139). Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. M., & Sandfort, J. R. (2009). Building a policy fields framework to inform research on nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38(6), 1054–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Tocqueville, A. (2000 [1835]). Democracy in America. The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (H. H. Gerth & C. Wright Mills, Eds.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod, B. A. (1977). The voluntary nonprofit sector. D.C. Heath and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. R. (2000). Alternative models of government-nonprofit sector relations: Theoretical and international perspectives. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 29(1), 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernard Enjolras .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Enjolras, B., Trætteberg, H.S. (2021). Interactions Between Local Government and Voluntary Organizations: Theoretical Perspectives. In: Ibsen, B. (eds) Voluntary and Public Sector Collaboration in Scandinavia . Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72314-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72315-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics