Skip to main content

Adult Brachial Plexus Injuries: Determinants of Treatment (Timing, Injury Type, Injury Pattern)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1238 Accesses

Abstract

Brachial plexus lesions impact severely in the quality of life of patients that suffer from this type of injuries. Surgical treatment is at present the mainstay of treatment in patients that do not recover spontaneously. There are many determinants to consider in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries. The most important determinants are surgical timing and injury type. The latter includes preganglionic vs postganglionic injury; supraclavicular, retroclavicular, and infraclavicular; and the injury pattern. Other determinants of treatment are time from trauma to surgery, extent of the primary injury, compliance with postoperative rehabilitation, patient’s age, and body mass index.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siqueira MG, Malessy MJA. Traumatic brachial plexus lesions: clinical and surgical aspects. In: Treatment of peripheral nerve lesions: Prism Books; 2011. p. 93–110.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Results and current approach for Brachial Plexus reconstruction. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj. 2011;6:2.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Siquiera MG, Martins R, Heisse O, Socolovsky M (2010) Lesiones traumáticas del plexo braquial e adultos: Parte 1. Mecanismos de lesión, métodos diagnósticos e indicaciones del tratamiento quirúrgico. In: Neurocirugía, Aspectos Clínicos y Quirurgícos, 1st Ed. Corpus.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jones SJ, Parry CB, Landi A. Diagnosis of brachial plexus traction lesions by sensory nerve action potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials. Injury. 1981;12:376–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seddon HJ. A classification of nerve injuries. Br Med J. 1942;2:237–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sunderland S. A classification of peripheral nerve injuries producing loss of function. Brain. 1951;74:491–516.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Terzis JK, Papakonstantinou KC. The surgical treatment of brachial plexus injuries in adults. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:1097–122. quiz 1123–1124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Midha R. Nerve transfers for severe brachial plexus injuries: a review. Neurosurg Focus. 2004;16:E5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parry CB. Pain in avulsion lesions of the brachial plexus. Pain. 1980;9:41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Narakas AO. Lesions found when operating traction injuries of the brachial plexus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1993;95(Suppl):S56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Use of clinical signs and computed tomography myelography findings in detecting and excluding nerve root avulsion in complete brachial plexus palsy. J Neurosurg. 2006;105:835–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Landi A, Copeland S. Value of the Tinel sign in brachial plexus lesions. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1979;61:470–1.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertelli JA, Ghizoni MF. Long thoracic nerve: anatomy and functional assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:993–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith J, Padgett DJ, Kaufman KR, et al. Rhomboid muscle electromyography activity during 3 different manual muscle tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:987–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Birch R. Injuries to the brachial plexus: controversies and possibilities. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2001;12:285–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Birch R. Infraclavicular lesions. In: Boome RB, editor. The hand and upper extremity: the brachial plexus. Edinburgh and New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1997. p. 79–88.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Millesi H. Update on the treatment of adult brachial plexus injuries. In: Brachial plexus injuries. Martin Dunitz Ltd. 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Socolovsky M, di Masi G, Bonilla G, et al. Age as a predictor of long-term results in patients with brachial plexus palsies undergoing surgical repair. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018;15:15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Battaglia D. Use of long autologous nerve grafts in brachial plexus reconstruction: factors that affect the outcome. Acta Neurochir. 2011;153:2231–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Socolovsky M, di Masi G, Bonilla G, et al. The phrenic nerve as a donor for brachial plexus injuries: is it safe and effective? Case series and literature analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2015;157:1077–86; discussion 1086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Elhassan B, Bishop AT, Hartzler RU, et al. Tendon transfer options about the shoulder in patients with brachial plexus injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:1391–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Socolovsky M, Di Masi G, Bonilla G, Malessy M. Spinal to accessory nerve transfer in traumatic brachial plexus palsy: is body mass index a predictor of outcome? Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:159–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Socolovsky M, Martins RS, Di Masi G, et al. Influence of body mass index on the outcome of brachial plexus surgery: are there any differences between elbow and shoulder results? Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:2337–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Socolovsky M, Paez MD. A literature review of intercostal-to-musculocutaneous-nerve transfers in brachial plexus injury patients: does body mass index influence results in Eastern versus Western countries? Surg Neurol Int. 2013;4:152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee J-Y, Kircher MF, Spinner RJ, et al. Factors affecting outcome of triceps motor branch transfer for isolated axillary nerve injury. J Hand Surg Am. 2012;37:2350–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnsen PH, Wolfe SW. Successful nerve transfers for traumatic brachial plexus palsy in a septuagenarian: a case report. Hand (N Y). 2016;11:NP30–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bonnard C, Anastakis DJ, van Melle G, Narakas AO. Isolated and combined lesions of the axillary nerve. A review of 146 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:212–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Terzis JK, Barbitsioti A. Primary restoration of elbow flexion in adult post-traumatic plexopathy patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65:72–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Terzis JK, Barmpitsioti A. Axillary nerve reconstruction in 176 posttraumatic plexopathy patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:233–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Costales, R., Socolovsky, M. (2021). Adult Brachial Plexus Injuries: Determinants of Treatment (Timing, Injury Type, Injury Pattern). In: Shin, A.Y., Pulos, N. (eds) Operative Brachial Plexus Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69517-0_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69517-0_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69516-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69517-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics