Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Laws and Regulations Governing Hospitals and Healthcare Entities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Medical-Legal Aspects of Acute Care Medicine

  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

Healthcare is the most regulated economic activity in the USA; and, therefore, not unexpectedly, is subject to a large array of federal, state, and local statutes, regulations, laws, and ordinances. Although such regulatory oversight applies to clinical practices, as well as healthcare institutions of all sizes, the scope of regulatory oversight is best exemplified in the regulation of acute and long-term care facilities. The importance of compliance with all applicable laws is vital to operational and strategic integrity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Chevron, supra.

  2. 2.

    See The Governance Institute, supra.

References

  1. American Hospital Association (AHA). Regulatory overload: assessing the regulatory burden on health systems, hospitals and post-acute care providers. Available online at: https://www.aha.org/system/files/2018-02/regulatory-overload-report.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  2. Söylemez MM. The Jundishapur School: its history, structure, and functions. Am J Islam Soc Sci. 22:2. Available online at: https://www.academia.edu/14579207/The_Jundishapur_School_Its_History_Structure_and_Functions. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  3. Guenter B. Risse, mending bodies, saving souls: a history of hospitals. New York: Oxford University Press; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Starr P. The social transformation of american medicine. New York: Basic Books; 1982. p. 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Penn Medicine. History of Pennsylvania Hospital. Available online at: http://www.uphs.upenn.edu/paharc/features/creation.html#:~:text=The%20Story%20of%20the%20Creation%20of%20the%20Nation%27s,the%20fastest%20growing%20city%20in%20the%2013%20colonies. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  6. Williams WH. The early days of Anglo-America’s first hospital: The Pennsylvania Hospital, 1751-1775. J Am Med Assoc. 1972;220(1):115–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vern L, Bullough B. Medieval Nursing. Nurs Hist Rev. 1993;1:89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. James H. Cassedy, medicine in america: a short history. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosen G. The structure of American medical practice 1875–1941. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1983.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Nancy G. Siraisi, medieval and early renaissance medicine: an introduction to knowledge and practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beck AH. The flexner report and the standardization of American medical education. JAMA. 2004;291(17):2139–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Flexner A. Medical education in the United States and Canada: a report to the Carnegie foundation for the advancement of teaching. New York: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching; 1910.

    Google Scholar 

  13. U.S. Const. amend. X.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Title VI of the Public Health Service Act, Pub. L. No. 79-725, 60 Stat. 1040 (1946) (codified, as amended, at 42 U.S.C. §§ 291-291o (1976)) [hereinafter referred to as the Act or Title VII. In 1975 Congress enacted Title XVI of the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974 to supplant the original Hill-Burton Act. Pub. L. No.93-641, 88 Stat. 2258 (codified at 42 U.S.C. §§ 300o-300t (1976)) [hereinafter referred to as the new Act or Title XVI].

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pub. L. No. 92–603, § 1122, 86 Stat. 1386–90 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974, Pub. L. No. 93–641, 88 Stat. 2225 (repealed 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Compliance level. 42 C.F.R. § 124.503 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hill-Burton Facilities. MedicareFAQ. Available online at: https://www.medicarefaq.com/blog/hill-burton-act/. Verified 12 Jun 2020.

  19. Roberts JS, Coale JG, Redman RR. A history of the joint commission on accreditation of hospitals. JAMA. 1987;258(7):936–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Survey, Certification and Enforcement Procedures. 42 CFR Parts 488 and 489. Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 66 / Friday, April 5, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Conditions for Coverage (CfCs) & Conditions of Participations (CoPs). https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Legislation/CFCsAndCoPs/index.html?redirect=/CFCsAndCOPs/. 2013. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  22. Joint Commission International Accreditation and Certification Policies. Accreditation and certification fee policies. 2015. http://www.jointcommissioninternational.org/assets/3/7/06-Accreditation-Fee-Policies.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  23. Armour S. House panel probes organizations that accredit most U.S. Hospitals. https://www.wsj.com/articles/house-panel-probes-organizations-that-accredit-most-u-s-hospitals-1520871334. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  24. Griffith JR, Knutzen SR, Alexander JA. Structural versus outcomes measures in hospitals: a comparison of joint commission and medicare outcomes scores in hospitals. Qual Manag Health Care. 2002;10(2):29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barnett ML, Olenski AR, Jena AB. Patient mortality during unannounced accreditation surveys at US Hospitals. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(5):693–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lam MB, Figueroa JF, Feyman Y, Reimold KE, Orav EJ, Jha AK. Association between patient outcomes and accreditation in US hospitals: observational study. BMJ. 2018;363:k4011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. AHA. Health care systems. Available online at: https://www.aha.org/advocacy/health-care-systems. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  28. AHRQ. Defining Health Systems. Content last reviewed September 2017. Agency for healthcare research and quality, Rockville, MD. Available online at: https://www.ahrq.gov/chsp/chsp-reports/resources-for-understanding-health-systems/defining-health-systems.htm. Verified October 11, 2020.

  29. Public Law 105–33, 111 Stat. 251 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Critical Access Hospitals Fact Sheet. CMS. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/downloads/CritAccessHospfctsht.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  31. Limitation on prices of drugs purchased by covered entities. 42 USC 256b(a)(4)(L)(i).

    Google Scholar 

  32. CMS. Hospitals. Online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Hospitals. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  33. 42 CFR 485 subpart F.

    Google Scholar 

  34. CMS. Critical Access Hospital Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/Downloads/CritAccessHospfctsht.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  35. CMS. Critical Access Hospitals. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/CAHs.

  36. John Elflein. Number of all hospitals in the U.S. 1975–2018. Statista. July 2, 2020. Available online at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/185843/number-of-all-hospitals-in-the-us-since-2001/. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  37. Liu JB, Kelz RR. Types of hospitals in the United States. JAMA. 2018;320(10):1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. NYCRR 10. 441.8. Acute Care.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Definition of Acute care hospital. Law Insider. Available online at: https://www.lawinsider.com/dictionary/acute-care-hospital. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  40. CMS. What are long-term care hospitals? Revised June 2019. Available online at: https://www.medicare.gov/Pubs/pdf/11347-Long-Term-Care-Hospitals.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  41. Schiel WC. Medical definition of long-term care facility. MedicineNet. Available online at: https://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=24859. Verified October 11, 2020.

  42. 42 CFR Part 483. Requirements for states and long term care facilities. Available online at: https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/part-483. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  43. Jost TS. Regulation of the quality of nursing home care in the United States. Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;1(4):223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Kapp MB. Malpracxtice liability in long term care: a changing environment. 24 Creighton L Rev. 1235 (1191).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stevenson DG, Studdert DM. The rise of nursing home litigation: findings from a national survey of attorneys. Health Aff. 2003;22(2):219–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Studdert DM, Spittal MJ, Mello MM, et al. Relationship between quality of care and negligence litigation in nursing homes. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1243–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Implications of For-Profit Enterprise in Health Care. In: Gray BH, editor. For-profit enterprise in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 1986. An exchange on for-profit health care. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK217899/. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Berkowitz E. America’s welfare state: from Roosevelt to Reagan. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Title XVIII, Social Security Act of 1965, Pub. L. No. 89-97, 79 Stat. 286 (codified in scattered sections of 26, 42 & 45 U.S.C. (1976)). The elderly are the chief beneficiaries of the program, although persons with certain disabilities and those with end-stage renal disease are eligible regardless of age. Need is not a factor in entitlement to benefits. "Part A" Medicare benefits, which provide hospital insurance, are funded primarily through the Social Security tax.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Xu J, Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Arias E. Mortality in the United States, 2012. October 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Health Care Financing Administration, Office of the Actuary. Data from estimates based on President’s fiscal year 2001 budget. Jan, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  52. DeParle NA. Celebrating 35 years of medicare and medicaid. Health Care Financ Rev. 2000;22(1):1–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. U.S. Constitution, Art. 1, §8, cl. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Galva JE, Atchison C, Levey S. Public health strategy and the police powers of the state. Public Health Rep. 2005;120 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):20–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wayman v. Southard. 23 U.S. (10 Wheat) 1, 41, (1825).

    Google Scholar 

  56. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 372 (1989). See also Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. Adkins, 310 U.S. 381, 398 (1940) (“Delegation by Congress has long been recognized as necessary in order that the exertion of legislative power does not become a futility”).

    Google Scholar 

  57. Szalados JE. Regulatory law and the clinical practice of the neurosciences. Chapter 5. In: Szalados JE, editor. Ethics and law for neurosciences clinicians: foundations and evolving challenges. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press; 2019. p. 81–103.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 551 et seq. and 5 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  59. Administrative Procedure Act (APA). 5 U.S.C. §551(5) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  60. Administrative Procedure Act (APA). 5 U.S.C. §551(4) (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  61. HHS. HHS Regulations Toolkit. Available online at: https://www.hhs.gov/regulations/regulations-toolkit/index.html.

  62. Estate of Smith v. Heckler. 747 F.2d 583 (10th Circ. 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  63. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Auer v. Robbins, 519 U.S. 452 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  65. Skidmore v. Swift, 323 U.S. 134 (1944).

    Google Scholar 

  66. Administrative Procedure Act. 5 USC §551 et seq. (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  67. Brown RS, Clement DG, Hill JW, Retchin SM, Bergeron JW. Do health maintenance organizations work for Medicare? Health Care Financ Rev. 1993;15(1):7–23.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. CMS. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  70. Econometrica, Inc. Final Evaluation Report. Evaluation of the community-based care transitions program. November 2017. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439931/#R5. Verified 11 Oct. 2020.

  71. Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). CMS. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Readmissions-Reduction-Program.

  72. Jencks SF, Williams MV, Coleman EA. Rehospitalizations among patients in the medicare fee-for-service program [published correction appears in N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 21;364(16):1582]. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(14):1418–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Medicare Payment Advisory Commission. Report to the congress: promoting greater efficiency in medicare. Available online at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4439931/#R5. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  74. CMS. The hospital value-based purchasing (VBP) program. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HVBP/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  75. Chee TT, Ryan AM, Wasfy JH, Borden WB. Current state of value-based purchasing programs. Circulation. 2016;133(22):2197–205. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.010268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Szalados JE. “P4P as a performance-based compensation arrangement in health care: foundation, administrative structure, and legal pitfalls” in Managed care litigation. 2007 Supplement. Barnes J. ed. BNA Books. pp. 129–180. 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Accessed 15 Oct 2015. MACRA: MIPS & APMs. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  78. The Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Centers for medicare and medicaid. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/HVBP/Hospital-Value-Based-Purchasing. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  79. Szalados JE. “P4P as a performance-based compensation arrangement in health care: foundation, administrative structure, and legal pitfalls” in managed care litigation. 2009 Cumulative Supplement. Barnes J. ed. BNA Books. pp. 129–180. 2007. ISBN: 978-1-57018-766-7.

    Google Scholar 

  80. CMS. Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program Fiscal Year 2020 Fact Sheet. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Medicare-Fee-for-Service-Payment/AcuteInpatientPPS/Downloads/HAC-Reduction-Program-Fact-Sheet.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  81. Zogg CK, Thumma JR, Ryan AM, Dimick JB. Medicare’s hospital acquired condition reduction program disproportionately affects minority-serving hospitals: variation by race, socioeconomic status, and disproportionate share hospital payment receipt. Ann Surg. 2020;271(6):985–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Fuller RL, Goldfield NI, Averill RF, Hughes JS. Is the CMS hospital-acquired condition reduction program a valid measure of hospital performance? Am J Med Qual. 2017;32(3):254–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Deficit Reduction Act, Pub. L. No. 109-1711, Chap. 3, § 6032; see also Deficit Reduction Act. 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(68) (2005). See also OIG. Compliance Resource Portal. Available online at: https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/compliance-resource-portal/index.asp. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  84. Publication of the OIG compliance program guidance for hospitals--OIG. Notice. Fed Regist. 1998;63(35):8987–98.

    Google Scholar 

  85. U.S. Sentencing Commission. Guidelines Manual (Nov. 2013) (USSG). http://www.ussc.gov/sites/default/files/pdf/guidelines-manual/2013/manual-pdf/2013_Guidelines_Manual_Full.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  86. Saum TB, Byassee J. Effective health care corporate compliance. Physician Exec. 2000;26(3):56–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Practical Guidance for Health Care Governing Boards on Compliance Oversight. April 20, 2015. Available online at: https://ahia.org/assets/Uploads/pdfUpload/WhitePapers/PracticalGuidanceForHealthCareGoverningBoardsOnComplianceOversight.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  88. Unites States Department of Justice. Antitrust division. Healthcare. Available online at: https://www.justice.gov/atr/health-care.

  89. Satiani B. Relevance of federal antitrust statutes to clinical practice. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37(6):1334–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. U.S.C. 15 (1013 b).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor. 42 U.S. Code § 1395dd (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  93. Ansell DA, Schiff RL. Patient dumping. Status, implications, and policy recommendations. JAMA. 1987;257(11):1500–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Morales v. Sociedad, 524 F.3d 54 (1st. Cir. 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  95. Examination and treatment for emergency medical conditions and women in labor. 42 USC 1395dd (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  96. 42 Code of Federal Regulations § 489.24(b).

    Google Scholar 

  97. Medicare Program: Changes to the Hospital Inpatient Prospective payment Systems and Fiscal Year 2009 Rates; Payments for Graduate medical Education in Certain Emergency Situations; Changes to Disclosure of Physician Ownership in Hospitals and Physician Self-Referral Rules; Updates to the long-Term Care Prospective Payment System; Updates to Certain IPPS-Excluded Hospitals; and Collection of information Regarding Financial Relationships between Hospitals. 73 Fed. Reg. 48434–48659 Vol 73 no. 161 (Aug. 19, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  98. 42 CFR Parts 413, 482, and 489. Medicare program: clarifying policies related to the responsibilities of medicare-participating hospitals in treating individuals with emergency medical conditions; final rule. 68 Fed. Reg. 53221-53264. Vol. 68 no. 174 (Sept. 9, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  99. Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). Requirements and implications related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). QSO-20-15 Hospital/CAH/EMTALA. CMS. March 9, 2020. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/files/document/qso-20-15-hospitalcahemtala.pdf.

  100. 1135 Waiver- At A Glance. CMS. Available online at: https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/SurveyCertEmergPrep/Downloads/1135-Waivers-At-A-Glance.pdf. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  101. 26 CFR § 1.501(a)-1. Exemption from taxation.

    Google Scholar 

  102. IRS (US) Revenue ruling 69-545, 1969-2, C.B. 117. Available online at: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/rr69-545.pdf.

  103. IRS. Charitable Hospitals – General Requirements for Tax-Exemption Under Section 501(c)(3). Available online at: https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/charitable-hospitals-general-requirements-for-tax-exemption-under-section-501c3.

  104. Internal Revenue Code. 26 U.S.C. §501(r).

    Google Scholar 

  105. Rosenbaum S, Margulies R. Tax-exempt hospitals and the patient protection and affordable care act: implications for public health policy and practice. Public Health Rep. 2011;126(2):283–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Lorens v. Catholic Health Care Partners, 35.6 F. Supp. 2d 827 (N.D. Ohio 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  107. Vencor, Inc. v. Physicians Mut. Ins. Co., 211 F.3d 1323 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  108. Provena Covenant Med. Ctr. v. Dep’t of Revenue, 925 N.E.2d 1131, 236 Ill. 2d 368, 2010 Ill. LEXIS 289, 339 Ill. Dec. 10 (Ill. Mar. 18, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  109. Pointer DD, Totten MK, Orlikoff JE. Trustee workbook 2. The balanced scorecard: a tool for maximizing board performance. Trustee. 2005;58(4):17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. The Governance Institute. Leadership in healthcare organizations. A guide to joint commission leadership standards. 2009. Available online at: https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-library/wp_leadership_standardspdf.pdf?db=web&hash=86F0223A5C016F833DA3DDB1C62F5D20. Verified 11 Oct 2020.

  111. Culica D, Prezio E. Hospital board infrastructure and functions: the role of governance in financial performance. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2009;6(3):862–73. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph6030862.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Jha A, Epstein A. Hospital governance and the quality of care. Health Aff. 2010;29(1):182–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Pronovost PJ, Armstrong CM, Demski R, Peterson RR, Rothman PB. Next level of board accountability in health care quality. J Health Organ Manag. 2018;32(1):2–8. https://doi.org/10.1108/JHOM-09-2017-0238.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Spaeth RG, Pickering KC, Webb SM. Quality assurance and hospital structure: how the physician-hospital relationship affects quality measures. Ann Health Law. 2003;12(2):235–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Director, Surgical and Neurocritical Care Units, Rochester Regional Health System at Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA

    James E. Szalados

  2. The Szalados Law Firm, Hilton, NY, USA

    James E. Szalados

Authors
  1. James E. Szalados
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Szalados .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Director, Surgical and Neurocritical Care Units, Rochester Regional Health System at Rochester General Hospital, Rochester, NY, USA

    James E. Szalados

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Szalados, J.E. (2021). The Laws and Regulations Governing Hospitals and Healthcare Entities. In: Szalados, J.E. (eds) The Medical-Legal Aspects of Acute Care Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68570-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68570-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68569-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68570-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation