Skip to main content

“Invisible Heritage”: New Technologies and the History of Antarctica’s Sealers Groups

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Festivals and Heritage in Latin America

Part of the book series: The Latin American Studies Book Series ((LASBS))

  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses alternative forms of heritage construction and preservation related to the human occupation of Antarctica by subaltern groups and its invisibilities in the official discourses on the colonization of the continent. Our proposal associates public, digital and sensorial archaeology approaches, highlighting a more pluralistic and democratic narrative about the southernmost past. For this purpose, we used tools such as new technologies applied to archaeological research (3D laser scan, object scanner, 3D printers, drones and others). Besides, through itinerant sensory exhibits (which simulates the Antarctic environment within an inflatable dome), we seek to narrow communication channels between the archaeological and non-archaeological public. Also, we encouraged the construction of multivocal narratives on the human occupation of Antarctica.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bezerra M (2012) Signifying heritage in Amazon: a public archaeology project at Vila de Joanes, Marajó Island, Brazil. Chungara 44(3):363–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonacchi C (2012) Introduction. In: Bonacchi C (eds) Archaeology and digital communication. Towards strategies of public engagement. Archetype Publications, London, pp 9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles C, McCuistion A, Means B (2013) Virtual artifact curation of the historical past and the next engine desktop 3D scanner. In: Technical briefs in historical archaeology, vol 6, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen C (1993) Worlds of sense. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Classen C (1997) Foundations for an anthropology of the senses. Int Soc Sci J 153:401–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobres M, Robb J (2000) Agency in archaeology: paradigm or platitude? In: Dobres, MR (orgs) Agency in Archaeology. Routledge, London & New York, pp 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Figueiroa R (2012) Por uma arqueologia das mídias: digitalizando em 3D o acervo cerâmico do museu de arqueologia de Xingó [For a midia archaeology: 3D scanning of the pottery collection from the Xingó Archaeological Museum]. In: 2º Colóquio de História e Arte História, arte e religiosidade nos caminhos da educação, 2012, Recife. URL: http://www.encontro2012.rj.anpuh.org/resources/anais/15/1338211118_ARQUIVO_ArtigoAnpuhRio2.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2016

  • Hodder I (2000) Agency and individuals in long-term processes. In: Dobres MR, Robb J (orgs) Agency in archaeology. Routledge, London & New York, pp 21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes D (1991) The varieties of sensory experience: a sourcebook in the anthropology of the senses. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes D (2005) Sensescapes: embodiment, culture and environment. In: Classen C (ed) The Book of Touch. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Howes D, Classen C (2009) Doing sensory anthropology. www.sensorystudies.org/?page_id=355. Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  • Kellner A (2010) Mistério sob o gelo—Uma aventura na Antártica [Mistery on the ice: An adventure in Antarctica]. Rocco, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (1994) Jamais fomos modernos. Ensaio de antropologia simétrica [We have never been modern]. Editora Nova fronteira. Rio de Janeiro

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour (1994b) On Technical mediation—philosophy, sociology, genealogy. Common Knowledge 3(2):29–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour (2012) Reagregando o social. Uma introdução à teoria do ator-rede [Reassembling the social. An introduction to Actor-Network-Theory]. EDUFBA e EDUSC, Salvador

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemos C (2014) Se me der licença, eu entro; se não der, eu vou embora: Patrimônio e Identidade na comunidade quilombola Chacrinha dos Pretos (Belo Vale/MG). [If you excuse me, I’ll come in, If you don’t, I’ll leave: Heritage and Identity at the quilombola community Chacrinha dos Pretos]. (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Belo Horizonte. 146p

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddison B (2014) Class and colonialism in Antarctic exploration, 1750–1920. Pickering and Chatto Publishers, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado M, Brito T (orgs) (2006) Antártica: ensino fundamental e ensino médio [Antarctica: elementary school and high school]. Ministério da Educação, Secretaria de Educação Básica, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman N (2004) Public archaeology. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pellini J (2010) Mudando o coração, a mente e as calças. A arqueologia sensorial [Changing the heart, the mind and the pants. Sensory Archeology]. Revista de Arqueologia do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, São Paulo 20:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellini (2016) Arqueologia e os sentidos. Entrando na toca do coelho [Archeology and the senses. Entering the rabbit hole]. Prismas

    Google Scholar 

  • Peris J, Felicísimo A, Polo M (2013) Three-dimensional models of archaeological objects: from laser scanners to interactive PDF documents. In: Technical briefs in historical archaeology, vol 7, pp 13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Pett D, Bonacchi C (2012) Conclusions. In: Bonacchi, C. (orgs). Archaeology and digital communication. Towards strategies of public engagement. Archetype Publications. London, pp 126–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L (2009) Measuring the success of digital public archaeology: towards a model for public participation in internet archaeology. Unpublished Master Thesis, University of London, London, 77p

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson L (2013) A digital public archaeology. Pap Inst Archaeol 23(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabloff J (2008) Archaeology matters: action archaeology in the Modern World. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, California, U.S.A

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor J, Berggren A, Dell’unto N et al (2015) Revisiting reflexive archaeology at Çatalhöyük: integrating digital and 3D technologies at the trowel’s edge. Antiquity 89:433–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilley C (1994) The materiality of stone. Explorations in landscape phenomenology: 1. Berg. Oxford e New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tratado Antártico [Antarctic Treaty] (1959) Washington, December 1st., 1959

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsiafaki D, Michailidou N (2015) Benefits and problems through the application of 3D technologies in archaeology: recording, visualization, representation and reconstruction. Sci Cult 1(3):37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf E (1982) Europe and the people without History. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarankin A, Senatore X (2007) Histórias de um passado em branco: arqueología historica Antártica [Histories of a White past: Antarctica historical archaeology]. Argumentum, Belo Horizonte, p 2007

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarankin A, Hissa S, Salermo et al (2011) Paisagens em branco: arqueologia e antropologia antárticas – avanços e desafios [Blank landscpaes: Antarctica archaeology and anthropology – advances and challenges. Vestígios. Revista Latino-Americana de Arqueologia Histórica 5(2):9–52

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Itinerante Ponto Museum of UFMG for the partnership signed and actions developed, Matheus Motta for the help in the application of new technologies in the project and Prof. Fabiana Lopes da Cunha and Prof. Jorge Rabassa for the invitation to participate in this volume.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrés Zarankin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zarankin, A., Soares, F.C. (2021). “Invisible Heritage”: New Technologies and the History of Antarctica’s Sealers Groups. In: Lopes da Cunha, F., Rabassa, J. (eds) Festivals and Heritage in Latin America. The Latin American Studies Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67985-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics